Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: A cephalometric investigation

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 23-27

  Weschler, Dominique ^a   Pancherz, Hans ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anchorage loss; Banded anchorage; Cast splint anchorage

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILM; HEAD; HUMAN; INCISOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL RECORD; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SCHOOL CHILD; SCREENING; SPLINT;

EID: 13244252385     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fletcher GGT. The retroclined upper incisors. Br J Orthod. 1975; 2:207-216.
2. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. Swed Dental J. Suppl. 1982;15:189-196.
3. Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles in 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adult-hood: a long term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:657-668.
4. Simons ME, Joondeph DR. Change in overbite: a ten-year post-retention study. Am J Orthod. 1973;64:349-367.
5. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusion with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dention. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:1-13.
6. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:149-164.
7. Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusion by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:423-442.
8. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-113.
9. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:215-228.
10. Lagerström L. Tiefbißkorrektur in Angle Klasse II,2 Okklusionsanomalien. In: Kieferorthopädie, Konzepte und Perspektiven. München: ZMS-Verlag; 1980:129-136.
11. Pancherz H, Obijou C. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:287-291.
12. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:273-287.
13. Hansen K, Koutsonas T, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the incisor segment: a cephalometric and biometric investigation. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:92-103.
14. Litowitz RA. Study of movements of certain teeth during and following orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1948;18:113-132.
15. Mills JRE. The long-term results of the proclination of lower incisors. Br Dent J. 1966;120:355-363.
16. Mills JRE. The stability of lower labial segment. Trans Br Soc Orthod. 1967;54:11-24.
17. Fuhrmann R. Kieferorthopädische Behandlung der Klasse II:2 Malokklusion. Nachuntersuchung von 17 Patienten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Unterlippenhöhe und der Bisshebung [medical dissertation]. Homburg, Saar, Germany; 1989.
18. Luffingham JK. The lower lip and the maxillary central incisors. Eur J Orthod. 1982;4:263-268.
19. Mills JRE. The problem of overbite in Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Br J Ortod. 1973;1:34-48.
20. Nicol WA. The lower lip and the upper incisor teeth in Angle's Class II, division 2 malocclusion. Dent Pract. 1963;14:179-182.
21. Posen AL. The influence of maximum perioral and tongue force on the incisor teeth. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:285-309.
22. Schweitzer M, Pancherz H. The incisor-lip relationship in Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:358-363.