Exploring the utility of Bayesian Networks for modelling cultural ecosystem services: A canoeing case study

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 540, Issue , 2016, Pages 71-78

  Shaw, Edward ^a   Kumar, Vikas ^b   Lange, Eckart ^a   Lerner, David N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian Networks; Canoeing; Cultural ecosystem service; Don Catchment; Recreation; Weirs

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES; WEIRS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS (BNS); CANOEING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING; KNOWLEDGE CAPTURE; NUMERICAL REPRESENTATION; PHYSICAL VARIABLES; RECREATION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BOATING; CULTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; MODELING; WEIR;

ARTICLE; BAYESIAN NETWORK; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; CULTURAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RECREATION; ROWING; BAYES THEOREM; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DON RIVER [ENGLAND]; ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

BAYES THEOREM; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY;

EID: 84945490963     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ames D.P., Neilson B.T., Stevens D.K., Lall U. Using Bayesian networks to model watershed management decisions: an East Canyon Creek case study. J. Hydroinform. 2005, 7:267-282.
2. Barton D.N., Saloranta T., Moe S.J., Eggestad H.O., Kuikka S. Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management - pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 66:91-104. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.012.
3. Borowski I., Hare M. Exploring the gap between water managers and researchers: difficulties of model-based tools to support practical water management. Water Resour. Manag. 2007, 21:1049-1074. 10.1007/s11269-006-9098-z.
4. Borsuk M.E., Stow C.A., Reckhow K.H. A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis. Ecol. Model. 2004, 173:219-239. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.08.020.
5. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 74:8-18. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
6. Church A., Fish R., Haines-Young R., Mourato S., Tratalos J., Stapleton L., Willis C., Coates P., Gibbons S., Leyshon C., Potschin M., Ravenscroft N., Sanchis-Guarner R., Winter M., Kenter J. Work package report 5: cultural ecosystem services and indicators. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on 2014, UNEP-WCMC, LWEC, UK.
7. Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., Ricketts T.H., Salzman J., Shallenberger R. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:21-28. 10.1890/080025.
8. Daly R., Shen Q., Aitken S. Learning Bayesian networks: approaches and issues. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 2011, 26:99-157. 10.1017/S0269888910000251.
9. Daniel T., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J., Chan K., Costanza R., Elmqvist T., Flint C., Gobster P., Grêt-Regamey A., Lave R., Muhar S., Penker M., Ribe R., Schauppenlehner T., Sikor T., Soloviy I., Spierenburg M., Taczanowska K., Tam J., von der Dunk A. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:8812-8819. 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
10. Das B. Generating Conditional Probabilities for Bayesian Networks: Easing the Knowledge Acquisition Problem. Information Technology Division, Electronics and Surveillance Research Laboratory. DSTO Report 1999, DSTO-TR-0918.
11. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
12. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:643-653. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
13. Gill L., Kumar V., Lange E., Lerner D., Morgan E., Romero D., Shaw E.A. An interactive visual decision support tool for sustainable urban river corridor management. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Ottawa, Canada 2010, 1438-1445.
14. Haines-Young R. Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 35:681-699. 10.1177/0309133311422977.
15. Harnad S. To cognize is to categorize: cognition is categorization. Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science 2005, Elsevier, New York.
16. Henriksen H.J., Rasmussen P., Brandt G., von Bulow D., Jensen F.V. Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22:1101-1113. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.008.
17. Holzkämper A., Kumar V., Surridge B., Paetzold A., Lerner D.N. Bringing diverse knowledge sources together - a meta-model for supporting integrated catchment management. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 116-127. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.016.
18. Jensen F.V., Nielsen T.D. Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Information Science and Statistics 2007, Springer, New York, New York, NY.
19. Kahn C.E., Roberts L.M., Shaffer K.A., Haddawy P. Construction of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 1997, 27:19-29. 10.1016/S0010-4825(96)00039-X.
20. Kumar V., Holzkaemper A., Surridge B., Rockett P., Niranjan M., Lerner D.N. Bayesian challenges in integrated catchment modelling. Presented at the International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Integrating Sciences and Information Technology for Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, Barcelona, Spain 2008.
21. Kumar V., Rouquette J.R., Lerner D.N. Integrated modelling for sustainability appraisal of urban river corridors: going beyond compartmentalised thinking. Water Res. 2013, 47:7221-7234. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.034.
22. Landuyt D., Broekx S., D'hondt R., Engelen G., Aertsens J., Goethals P.L.M. A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 46:1-11. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.011.
23. Marcot B.G., Holthausen R.S., Raphael M.G., Rowland M.M., Wisdom M.J. Using Bayesian belief networks to evaluate fish and wildlife population viability under land management alternatives from an environmental impact statement. For. Ecol. Manag. 2001, 153:29-42. 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00452-2.
24. Milcu A.I., Hanspach J., Abson D., Fischer J. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18. 10.5751/ES-05790-180344.
25. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
26. North J. A participant model for paddlesports initial technical considerations and model draft. Fusion Research 2011.
27. Norton L.R., Inwood H., Crowe A., Baker A. Trialling a method to quantify the "cultural services" of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:449-455. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.002.
28. Passuello A., Kumar V., Cadiach O., Schuhmacher M. Bayesian network application to land suitability classification in the sewage sludge amendment of agricultural soils. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2014, 20:1077-1098. 10.1080/10807039.2013.793092.
29. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Tengö M., Bennett E.M., Holland T., Benessaiah K., MacDonald G.K., Pfeifer L. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?. Bioscience 2010, 60:576-589. 10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.4.
30. Richardson M., Domingos P. Learning with knowledge from multiple experts. Presented at the ICML 2003, 624-631. AAAI Press.
31. Schaich H., Bieling C., Plieninger T. Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA 2010, 19:269-277.
32. Shaw E. Weir Management: Challenges, Analysis and Decision Support 2012, (Thesis), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
33. Varis O., Lahtela V. Integrated water resources management along the senegal river: introducing an analytical framework. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2002, 18:501-521. 10.1080/0790062022000017374.
34. Yang M.-H., Kriegman D.J., Ahuja N. Detecting faces in images: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002, 24:34-58. 10.1109/34.982883.