Trust in deliberation: The consequences of deliberative decision strategies for medical decisions

Health Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1090-1099

  Scherer, Laura D ^a   de Vries, Marieke ^b   Zikmund Fisher, Brian J ^c   Witteman, Holly O ^d   Fagerlin, Angela ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Intuition and deliberation; Patient decision aids; Values clarification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONFIRMATION BIAS; DELIBERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTUITION; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NORMAL HUMAN; SELF CONCEPT; THINKING; TRUST; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 84945470313     PISSN: 02786133     EISSN: 19307810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/hea0000203     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aldag, R. J., & Power, D. J. (1986). An empirical assessment of computerassisted decision analysis. Decision Sciences, 17, 572-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1986.tb00243.x
2. Amsterlaw, J., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2006). Can avoidance of complications lead to biased healthcare decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 64-75.
3. Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486
4. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal of Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.
5. Betsch, C. (2008). Chronic preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making: Lessons learned about intuition from an individual differences approach. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 231-248). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.
6. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
7. Connolly, T., & Reb, J. (2005). Regret in cancer-related decisions. Health Psychology, 24, S29-S34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S29
8. Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00203
9. Davis, E. L., McCaffery, K., Mullan, B., & Juraskova, I. (2014). An exploration of decision aid effectiveness: The impact of promoting affective vs. deliberative processing on a health-related decision. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care & Health Policy. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12248
10. de Vries, M., Fagerlin, A., Witteman, H. O., & Scherer, L. D. (2013). Combining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support. Patient Education and Counseling, 91, 154-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.016
11. Elwyn, G., & Miron-Shatz, T. (2010). Deliberation before determination: The definition and evaluation of good decision making. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care & Health Policy, 13, 139-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00572.x
12. Elwyn, G., O'Connor, A., Stacey, D., Volk, R., Edwards, A., Coulter, A.,. Whelan, T. (2006). Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aid: Online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 333, 417-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE
13. Evans, J. S. B. (2012). Dual-process theories of deductive reasoning: Facts and fallacies. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 115-133). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
15. Fagerlin, A., Abhyankar, P., Feldman-Stewart, D., Gavaruzzi, T., Kryworuchko, J., Levin, C.,. Witteman, H. O. (in press). Clarifying values: An updated review. BioMed Central. Medical Informatics and Decision Making.
16. Fagerlin, A., Pignone, M., Abhyankar, P., Col, N., Feldman-Stewart, D., Gavaruzzi, T.,. Witteman, H. O. (2013). Clarifying values: An updated review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, S8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S8
17. Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). Cure me even if it kills me: Preferences for invasive cancer treatment. Medical Decision Making, 25, 614-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05282639
18. Feldman-Stewart, D., Tong, C., Siemens, R., Alibhai, R., Pickles, T., Robinson, J., & Brundage, M. D. (2012). The impact of explicit values clarification exercises in a patient decision aid emerges after the decision is actually made: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Medical Decision Making, 32, 616-626.
19. Fraenkel, L., Street, R. L., Jr., Towle, V., O'Leary, J. R., Iannone, L., Van Ness, P. H., & Fried, T. R. (2012). A pilot randomized controlled trial of a decision support tool to improve the quality of communication and decision-making in individuals with atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60, 1434-1441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04080.x
20. Garvelink, M. M., ter Kuile, M. M., Stiggelbout, A. M., & de Vries, M. (2014). Values clarification in a decision aid about fertility preservation: Does it add to information provision? BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-68
21. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098
22. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
23. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
24. Kmett, C. M., Arkes, H. R., & Jones, S. K. (1999). The influence of decision aids on high school students' satisfaction with their college choice decision. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1293-1301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258010
25. Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., Van Boven, L., & Altermatt, T. W. (2004). The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 91-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00065-9
26. Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & Landfield, K. (2009). Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 390-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01144.x
27. Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B., & Sherman, S. J. (2013). The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: A dual-process perspective on overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 353-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033640
28. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
29. O'Connor, A. M., Bennett, C. L., Stacey, D., Barry, M., Col, N. F., Eden, K. B.,. Rovner, D. (2009). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2
30. O'Connor, A. M., Rostom, A., Fiset, V., Tetroe, J., Entwistle, V., Llewellyn-Thomas, H.,. Jones, J. (1999). Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 319, 731-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731
31. O'Connor, A. M., Wells, G. A., Tugwell, P., Laupacis, A., Elmslie, T., & Drake, E. (1999). The effects of an "explicit" values clarification exercise in a woman's decision aid regarding postmenopausal hormone therapy. Health Expectations, 2, 21-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00027.x
32. Pieterse, A. H., de Vries, M., Kunneman, M., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Feldman-Stewart, D. (2013). Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: A cognitive psychological perspective on patient healthrelated decision making. Social Science & Medicine, 77, 156-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.020
33. Pignone, M. P., Howard, K., Brenner, A. T., Crutchfield, T. M., Hawley, S. T., Lewis, C. L., & Sheridan, S. L. (2013). Comparing 3 techniques for eliciting patient values for decision making about prostate-specific antigen screening: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 173, 362-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2651
34. Redelmeier, D. A., & Shafir, E. (1995). Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 302-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520280048038
35. Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk a dual-processes approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 60-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
36. Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
37. Scherer, L., Ubel, P., & Fagerlin, A. (2014). Hypothetical cancer treatment decisions predict prostate cancer treatment preferences in real life. Manuscript in preparation.
38. Schwarz, N. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1, 289-308.
39. Senay, I., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2009). Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk. Medical Decision Making, 29, 193-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08327395
40. Sepucha, K., Ozanne, E., Silvia, K., Partridge, A., & Mulley, A. G., Jr. (2007). An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Education and Counseling, 65, 261-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.007
41. Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Col, N. F., Bennett, C. L., Barry, M. J., & Eden, K. B.,. Wu, J. H. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
42. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
43. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672
44. Ubel, P. (2013). Beyond comprehension. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 351-360). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
46. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181
47. Wong, J., D'Alimonte, L., Angus, J., Paszat, L., Metcalfe, K., Whelan, T.,. Szumacher, E. (2012). Development of patients' decision aid for older women with Stage I breast cancer considering radiotherapy after lumpectomy. International Journal of Radiation, Oncology, Biology, Physics, 84, 30-38.