How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 469-486

  Vigneau, Laurence ^a   Humphreys, Michael ^b   Moon, Jeremy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

Compliance; Corporate social responsibility; Global Reporting Initiative; Qualitative case study; Standardization; Translation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945441803     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,17(5), 731–757.
2. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum,32(4), 288–302.
3. Adams, C., & McNicholas, P. (2007). Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,20(3), 382–402.
4. Aravind, D., & Christmann, P. (2011). Decoupling of standard implementation from certification: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental performance? Business Ethics Quarterly,21(1), 73–102.
5. Arevalo, J. A., Aravind, D., Ayuso, S., & Roca, M. (2013). The Global Compact: An analysis of the motivations of adoption in the Spanish context. Business Ethics: A European Review,22(1), 1–15.
6. Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics,96(3), 339–354.
7. Banerjee, B. S. (2010). Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly,20(2), 265–274.
8. Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology,113(2), 297–351.
9. Behnam, M., & MacLean, T. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards?: A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly,21(1), 45–72.
10. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor.
11. Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science,18(1), 127–146.
12. Boiral, O. (2012). ISO certificates as organizational degrees? Beyond the rational myths of the certification process. Organization Studies,33(5–6), 633–654.
13. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics,111(2), 281–299.
14. Boxenbaum, E. (2006a). Corporate social responsibility as institutional hybrids. Journal of Business Strategies,23(1), 45–63.
15. Boxenbaum, E. (2006b). Lost in translation. American Behavioral Scientist,49(7), 939–948.
16. Boxenbaum, E., & Strandgaard Pedersen, J. (2009). Scandinavian institutionalism: A case of institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organization (pp. 178–204). Cambridge, MA: University of Cambridge Press.
17. Braithwaite, J. (2011). The essence of responsive regulation. UBC Law Review,44(3), 475–520.
18. Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Lessidrenska, T. (2009a). The rise of Global Reporting Initiative as a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics,18(2), 182–200.
19. Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009b). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production,17(6), 571–580.
20. Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies,33(5–6), 613–632.
21. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies,37(6), 863–878.
22. Clapp, J. (2005). Global environmental governance for corporate responsibility and accountability. Global Environmental Politics,5(3), 23–34.
23. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly,49(2), 173–208.
24. Coupland, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as argument on the web. Journal of Business Ethics,62(4), 355–366.
25. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26. Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
27. Delmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2011). An institutional perspective of the diffusion of international management system standards: The case of the environmental management standard 14001. Business Ethics Quarterly,21(1), 103–132.
28. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal,29(10), 1027–1055.
29. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review,48(2), 147–160.
30. Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Introduction: A world of governance: The rise of transnational regulation. In M.-L. Djelic & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 1–28). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Edelman, L. B. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology,95(6), 1401–1440.
33. Edelman, L. B. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology,97(6), 1531–1576.
34. Edelman, L. B., & Talesh, S. A. (2011). To comply or not to comply—That isn’t the question: How organizations construct the meaning of compliance. In C. Parker & V. L. Nielsen (Eds.), Explaining compliance: Business responses to regulation (pp. 103–122). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
35. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science,21(5), 1092–1107.
36. Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal,49(6), 1173–1193.
37. Fortanier, F., Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2011). Harmonization in CSR reporting. Management International Review,51(5), 665–696.
38. Frenkel, M. (2005). The politics of translation: How state-level political relations affect the cross-national travel of management ideas. Organization,12(2), 275–301.
39. Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly,21(1), 23–44.
40. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods,16(1), 15–31.
41. Gond, J.-P., & Herrbach, O. (2006). Social reporting as an organisational learning tool? A theoretical framework. Journal of Business Ethics,65(4), 359–371.
42. GRI. (2011a). About GRI.https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx.
43. GRI. (2011b). Application level information.https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/reporting-framework-overview/application-level-information/Pages/default.aspx.
44. GRI. (2011c). Sustainability reporting guidelines G3.1. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3.1-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf.
45. GRI. (2013). Sustainability reporting guidelines—G4. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf.
46. Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies,33(5–6), 815–845.
47. Hedberg, C.-J., & von Malmborg, F. (2003). The Global Reporting Initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,10(3), 153–164.
48. Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Boiral, O. (2013). ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a research agenda on management system standards*. International Journal of Management Reviews,15(1), 47–65.
49. Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly,17(3), 453–476.
50. Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. (2008). An analysis of corporate social responsibility at credit line: A narrative approach. Journal of Business Ethics,80(3), 403–418.
51. Jacobsson, B., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Dynamics of soft regulations. In M.-L. Djelic & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 247–265). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
52. Kobrin, S. J. (2008). Globalization, transnational corporations and the future of global governance. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 249–272). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
53. Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment,17(1), 1–15.
54. KPMG. (2011). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. http://www.kpmg.com/Ca/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/CSR%20Survey%202011.pdf.
55. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review,24(4), 691–710.
56. Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In D. D. Bergh & D. J. Ketchen (Eds.), Building methodological bridges. Research methodology in strategy and management (pp. 201–235). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
57. Levi-Faur, D., & Jordana, J. (2005). Regulatory capitalism: Policy irritant and convergent divergence. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,598, 191–199.
58. Levy, D. L., Brown, H. S., & de Jong, M. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance. Business and Society,49(1), 88–115.
59. Levy, D. L., & Kaplan, R. (2007). CSR and theories of global governance: Strategic contestation in global issue arenas. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of CSR (pp. 432–451). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. MacLean, R., & Rebernak, K. (2007). Closing the credibility gap: The challenges of corporate responsibility reporting. Environmental Quality Management,16(4), 1–6.
61. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies,33(3), 497–514.
62. Matten, D. & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for acomparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of ManagementReview,33(2), 404–424.
63. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
64. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology,83(2), 340–363.
65. Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum,30(2), 121–137.
66. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2011). Corporations and citizenship in new institutions of global governance. In C. Crouch & C. Maclean (Eds.), The responsible corporation in a global economy (pp. 203–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67. Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,39(1), 136–157.
68. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics,66(1), 71–88.
69. Parker, C., & Nielsen, V. L. (2011). Explaining compliance: Business responses to regulation. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
70. Perez-Batres, L., Doh, J., Miller, V., & Pisani, M. (2012). Stakeholder pressures as determinants of CSR strategic choice: Why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct? Journal of Business Ethics,110(2), 157–172.
71. Rasche, A. (2009). Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards: The case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,16(4), 192–205.
72. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies,33(5–6), 791–814.
73. Rhodes, C., & Brown, A. D. (2005). Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews,7(3), 167–188.
74. Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–224). London: Sage Publications.
75. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies,48(4), 899–931.
76. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly,16(4), 505–532.
77. Silverman, D. (2002). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
78. Simpson, D., Power, D., & Klassen, R. (2012). When one size does not fit all: A problem of fit rather than failure for voluntary management standards. Journal of Business Ethics,110(1), 85–95.
79. Slager, R., Gond, J.-P., & Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies,33(5–6), 763–790.
80. Sotorrío, L. L., & Sánchez, J. L. F. (2010). Corporate social reporting for different audiences: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,17(5), 272–283.
81. Toppinen, A., & Korhonen-Kurki, K. (2013). Global Reporting Initiative and social impact in managing corporate responsibility: A case study of three multinationals in the forest industry. Business Ethics: A European Review,22(2), 202–217.
82. van Oosterhout, J. (2010). The role of corporations in shaping the global rules of the game. In search of new foundations. Business Ethics Quarterly,20(2), 253–264.
83. Vogel, D. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business and Society,49(1), 68–87.
84. Waddock, S. (2007). On CERES, the GRI and Corporation 20/20. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship,26, 38–42.
85. Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives,22(3), 87–108.
86. Willis, A. (2003). The role of the Global Reporting Initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics,43(3), 233–237.
87. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
88. Zambon, S., & Del Bello, A. (2005). Towards a stakeholder responsible approach: The constructive role of reporting. Corporate Governance,5(2), 130–141.
89. Zilber, T. B. (2006). The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high tech. Academy of Management Journal,49(2), 281–303.