Effect of Computer-Assisted Learning on Students’ Dental Anatomy Waxing Performance

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1093-1100

  Kwon, So Ran ^a   Hernández, Marcela ^a   Blanchette, Derek R ^a   Lam, Matthew T ^a   Gratton, David G ^b   Aquilino, Steven A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; computer simulation; computer assisted instruction; dental anatomy; dental education; educational technology; teaching method

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN/COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL STUDENT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SELF EVALUATION; SKILL; SOFTWARE; ADULT; ANATOMY; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PROCEDURES; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANATOMY; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, DENTAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FACULTY, DENTAL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOTOR SKILLS; SELF-EVALUATION PROGRAMS; SOFTWARE; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84945324361     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2015.79.9.tb06003.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Fasbinder D.J. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137 (Suppl 9): 22S–31S.
2. Reiss B., Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent 2000; 3: 9–23.
3. Otto T., De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 122–8.
4. Wittneben J.G., Wright R.F., Weber H.P., Gallucci G.O. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 466–71.
5. Lenherr P., Marinello C.P. PrepCheck computergestützte objektive Beurteilung von Zahnpräparationen im Simulationslabor. Swiss Dent J 2014; 124 (10): 1085–92.
6. Cardoso J.A., Barbosa C., Fernandes S. et al. Reducing subjectivity in the evaluation of preclinical dental preparations for fixed prosthodontics using the Kavo PrepAssistant. Eur J Dent Educ 2006; 10: 149–56.
7. Kournetas N., Jaeger B., Axmann D. et al. Assessing the reliability of a digital preparation assistant system used in dental education. J Dent Educ 2004; 68 (12): 1228–34.
8. Haden N.K., Hendricson W.D., Kassebaum D.K. et al. Curriculum change in dental education, 2003–09. J Dent Educ 2010; 74 (5): 539–57.
9. Lilley J.D., Bruggen Cate H.J., Holloway P.J. et al. Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry. Br Dent J 1968; 125 (5): 194–7.
10. Sharaf A.A., Abdel Aziz A.M., El Meligy O.A.S. Intra- and inter-examiner variability in evaluating preclinical pediatric dentistry operative procedures. J Dent Educ 2007; 71 (4): 540–4.
11. Satterthwaite J.D., Grey N.J.A. Peer-group assessment of preclinical operative skills in restorative dentistry and comparison with experienced assessors. Eur J Dent Educ 2008; 12: 99–102.
12. Henzi D., Davis E., Jasinevicius R., Hendricson W. In the students’ own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ 2007; 71 (5): 632–45.
13. Kwon S.R., Restrepo-Kennedy N., Dawson D.V. et al. Dental anatomy grading: comparison between conventional visual and a novel digital assessment technique. J Dent Educ 2014; 78 (12): 1655–62.
14. Renne W.G., McGill T., Mennito A.S. et al. E4D Compare software: an alternative to faculty grading in dental education. J Dent Educ 2013; 77 (2): 168–75.
15. Rosenberg H., Grad H.A., Matear D.W. The effectiveness of computer-aided, self-instructional programs in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ 2003; 67 (5): 524–32.
16. Esser C., Kerschbaum T., Winkelmann V. et al. A comparison of the visual and technical asessment of preparations made by dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2006; 10: 157–61.
17. Hamil L.M., Mennito A.S., Renne W.G., Vuthiganon J. Dental students’ opinions of preparation assessment with E4D compare software versus traditional methods. J Dent Educ 2014; 78 (10): 1424–31.
18. Welk A., Splieth Ch, Wierinck E. et al. Computer-assisted learning and simulation systems in dentistry: a challenge to society. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9 (3): 253–65.