Dental anatomy grading: Comparison between conventional visual and a novel digital assessment technique

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 78, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1655-1662

  Ran Kwon, So ^a   Restrepo Kennedy, Natalia ^a   Dawson, Deborah V ^a   Hernandez, Marcela ^a   Denehy, Gerald ^a   Blanchette, Derek ^a   Gratton, David G ^a   Aquilino, Steven A ^a   Armstrong, Steven R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Dental anatomy; Dental education; Educational technology

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CALIBRATION; CHECKLIST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; MICROCOMPUTER; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANATOMY; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CALIBRATION; CHECKLIST; DENTAL MODELS; EDUCATION, DENTAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LASERS; MICROCOMPUTERS; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84925222411     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lilley JD, Bruggen Cate HJ, Holloway PJ, et al. Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry. Br Dent J 1968;125(5):194-7.
2. Jenkins SM, Dummer PMH, Gilmour ASM, et al. Evaluating undergraduate preclinical operative skill: use of a glance and grade marking system. J Dent 1998;26(8): 679-84.
3. Haj-Ali R, Feil P. Rater reliability: short-and long-term effects of calibration training. J Dent Educ 2006;70(4): 428-33.
4. Sharaf AA, Abdel Aziz AM, El Meligy OAS. Intraand interexaminer variability in evaluating preclinical pediatric dentistry operative procedures. J Dent Educ 2007;71(4):540-4.
5. Licari FW, Knight GW, Guenzel PJ. Designing evaluation forms to facilitate student learning. J Dent Educ 2008;72(1):48-58.
6. Satterthwaite JD, Grey NJA. Peer-group assessment of preclinical operative skills in restorative dentistry and comparison with experienced assessors. Eur J Dent Educ 2008;12:99-102.
7. Obrez A, Briggs C, Buckman J, et al. Teaching clinically relevant dental anatomy in the dental curriculum: description and assessment of an innovative module. J Dent Educ 2011;75(6):797-804.
8. Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum? J Dent Educ 2007;71(5):632-45.
9. Renne WG, McGill T, Mennito AS, et al. E4D Compare software: an alternative to faculty grading in dental education. J Dent Educ 2013;77(2):168-75.
10. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86(2):420-8.
11. Knight GW. Toward faculty calibration. J Dent Educ 1997;61(12):941-6.
12. Haden NK, Hendricson WD, Kassebaum DK, et al. Curriculum change in dental education, 2003-09. J Dent Educ 2010;74(5):539-57.