A comparison of the visual and technical assessment of preparations made by dental students

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 157-161

  Esser, Clemens ^a   Kerschbaum, T ^a   Winkelmann, V ^a   Krage, T ^a   Faber, F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Education; Evaluation; Preparation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL STUDENT; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TEACHING;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, DENTAL; HUMANS; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STUDENTS, DENTAL; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC;

EID: 33748114518     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00408.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rosenberg H, Grad HA, Matear DW. The effectiveness of computer-aided, self-instructional programs in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ 2003: 67: 524-532.
2. Brearley Messer L, Kan K, Cameron A, Robinson R. Teaching paediatric dentistry by multimedia: a threeyear report. Eur J Dent Educ 2002: 3: 128-138.
3. Abbey LM. Interactive multimedia patient simulations in dental and continuing dental education. Dent Clin North Am 2002: 3: 575-587.
4. Robinson PB, Lee JW. The use of real time video magnification for the pre-clinical teaching of crown preparations. Br Dent J 2001: 9: 506-510.
5. Kenneth AE. E-learning-new technologies but slow progress. Int J Comput Dent 2004: 2: 115-117.
6. Rosenberg H, Grad H, Matear DW. The effectiveness of computer-aided, self-instructional programs in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ 2003: 5: 524-532.
7. Welk A, Splieth C, Rosin M, Kordaß B, Meyer G. DentSim-a future teaching option for dentists. Int J Comput Dent 2004: 2: 123-130.
8. Quinn F, Keogh P, McDonald A, Hussey D. A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of conventional training and virtual reality simulation in the skills acquisition of junior dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2003: 7: 13-19.
9. Jasinevicius T, Landers M, Nelson S. Evaluation of two simulation systems: computer assisted vs. traditional simulator. J Dent Educ 2002: 2: 300.
10. Arnetzl G, Dornhofer R. PREPassistant: a system for evaluating tooth preparations. Int J Comput Dent 2004: 2: 187-197.
11. Buchanan JA. Use of simulation technology in dental education. J Dent Educ 2001: 65: 1225-1231.
12. Buchanan JA. Experience with virtual reality-based technology in teaching restorative dental procedures. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 1258-1265.
13. LeBlanc V, Urbankova A, Hadavi F, Lichtenthal R. A preliminary study in using virtual reality to train dental students. J Dent Educ 2004: 3: 378-383.
14. Welk A, Immenroth M, Jungholt J, Kordaß B, Meyer G. Methods for increasing the measuring accuracy of the DentSim unit. Int J Comput Dent 2000: 5: 229-230.
15. Lackey MA. One year's experience with virtual reality preclinical laboratory simulation at the University of Tennessee. Int J Comput Dent 2004: 7: 131-141.
16. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann R, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997: 11: 1799-1807.
17. Mehl A, Hickel R. A new optical 3D-scanning system for CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 1999: 2: 129- 136.
18. Asselmeyer H. Trends, current developments, and concepts in distance learning and E-learning. Int J Comput Dent 2004: 2: 145-157.
19. Höhne S, Schumann RR. Computer-assisted learning in human and dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent 2004: 2: 159-167.
20. Gaines W, Bruggers H, Rassmussen RH. Reliability of ratings in preclinical fixed prosthodontics: effect of objective scaling. J Dent Educ 1974: 38: 672.
21. Bedi R, Lo E, King N, Chan T. The effect of pictorial criteria upon the reliability of assessments of cavity preparations. J Dent 1987: 15: 222-224.
22. Fuller J. The effects of training and criterion models on inter-judge reliability. J Dent 1972: 36: 19-22.
23. Jenkins SM, Dummer PM, Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH, Hicks R, Ash P. Evaluating undergraduate preclinical operative skill; use of a glance and grade marking system. J Dent 1998: 8: 679-684.
24. Lilley J, ten Bruggen Cate H, Holloway P, Holt J, Start K. Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry. Br Dent J 1968: 125: 194-197.
25. Natkin E, Guild R. Evaluation of preclinical laboratory performance. J Dent Educ 1967: 31: 152-161.