Watching what's coming near increases tactile sensitivity: An experimental investigation

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 297, Issue , 2016, Pages 307-314

  Van der Biest, Lien ^a   Legrain, Valéry ^b   De Paepe, Annick ^a   Crombez, Geert ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attention; Crossmodal interaction; Peripersonal space

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TACTILE SENSITIVITY; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HAND; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SELF CONCEPT; VIBRATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SELF CONCEPT; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VIBRATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84945318423     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Spence C., Driver J. Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Percept. Psychophys. 1997, 59:1-22. 10.3758/bf03206843.
2. Spence C., Nicholls M.E., Gillespie N., Driver J. Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Percept. Psychophys. 1998, 60:544-557. 10.3758/bf03206045.
3. Driver J., Spence C. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1998, 2:254-262. 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01188-7.
4. Macaluso E., Driver J. Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1304-1316. 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00119-1.
5. Calvert G.A., Campbell R., Brammer M.J. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:649-657. 10.1016/s0960-9822(00) 00513-3.
6. Sathian K., Zangaladze A., Hoffman J.M., Grafton S.T. Feeling with the mind's eye. Neuroreport 1997, 8. 10.1097/00001756-199712220-00008.
7. Calvert G.A., Brammer M.J., Bullmore E.T., Campbell R., Iversen S.D., David A.S. Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding. Neuroreport 1999, 10. 10.1097/00001756-199908200-00033.
8. Sambo C.F., Forster B. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:1550-1559. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21109.
9. Haggard P., Iannetti G.D., Longo M.R. Spatial sensory organization and body representation in pain perception. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.047.
10. Legrain V., Torta D.M. Cognitive psychology and neuropsychology of nociception and pain. Pain, Emot. Cogn. A Complex Nexus 2015, 3-20. Springer. G. Pickering, S. Gibson (Eds.).
11. De Paepe A.L., Crombez G., Spence C., Legrain V. Mapping nociceptive stimuli in a peripersonal frame of reference: evidence from a temporal order judgment task. Neuropsychologia 2014, 56:219-228. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.016.
12. Graziano M.S.A., Gross C.G. The representation of extrapersonal space: a possible role for bimodal visual-tactile neurons. Cogn. Neurosci. 1995, 1021-1034.
13. Vandenbroucke S., Crombez G., Harrar V., Brusselmans G., Devulder J., Spence C., et al. Fibromyalgia patients and controls are equally accurate in detecting tactile stimuli while observing another in pain: an experimental study. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2014, 2548-2559. 10.3758/s13414-014-0729-9.
14. Vandenbroucke S., Crombez G., Loeys T., Goubert L. Observing another in pain facilitates vicarious experiences and modulates somatosensory experiences. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:1-14. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00631.
15. Press C., Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., Haggard P. Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation. Exp. Brain Res. 2004, 154:238-245. 10.1007/s00221-003-1651-x.
16. Von Korff M., Ormel J., Keefe F.J., Dworkin S.F. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992, 50:133-149. 10.1016/0304-3959(92) 90154-4.
17. Sullivan M.J.L., Bishop S.R., Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol. Assess. 1995, 7:524-532. 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524.
18. Spielberger C.D. State-trait anxiety inventory. Anxiety 1987 2009, 19.
19. Pinheiro J.C., Bates D.M. Mixed Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS 2000, SpringerVerlag, New York. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1.
20. B.T. West, K.B. Welch, A.T. Ga, H. Crc, Linear mixed models. A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. vol. 27. 2007. doi:10.1002/sim.3167.
21. Hu S. Akaike information criterion. Cent. Res. Sci. Comput. 2007, 10.2307/1268842.
22. De Ruddere L., Goubert L., Prkachin K.M., Louis Stevens M.A., Van Ryckeghem D.M.L., Crombez G. When you dislike patients, pain is taken less seriously. Pain 2011, 152:2342-2347. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.028.
23. De Ruddere L., Goubert L., Stevens M., Amanda A.C., Crombez G. Discounting pain in the absence of medical evidence is explained by negative evaluation of the patient. Pain 2013, 154:669-676. 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.018.
24. Verbruggen F., Aron A.R., Stevens M.A., Chambers C.D. Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:13966-13971. 10.1073/pnas.1001957107.
25. Làdavas E., Farnè A. Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space. J. Physiol. Paris 2004, 98:161-170. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.007.
26. Harden R.N., Bruehl S., Perez R.S.G.M., Birklein F., Marinus J., Maihofner C., et al. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "budapest criteria") for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 2010, 150:268-274. 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.030.
27. Harden R.N. Objectification of the diagnostic criteria for CRPS. Pain Med. 2010, 11:1212-1215. 10.1111/j. 1526-4637.2010.00909.x.
28. Keizer D., van Wijhe M., Post W.J., Wierda J.M.K.H. Quantifying allodynia in patients suffering from unilateral neuropathic pain using von frey monofilaments. Clin. J. Pain 2007, 23:85-90. 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210950.01503.72.
29. Driver J., Spence C. Cross-modal links in spatial attention. Philos. Trans R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1998, 353:1319-1331. 10.1098/rstb.1998.0286.
30. Làdavas E., di Pellegrino G., Farnè A., Zeloni G. Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1998, 10:581-589. 10.1162/089892998562988.
31. Ladavas Functional and dynamic properties of visual perispace. Trends Cogn. Sci. Sci. 2004, 6:17-22.
32. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V. The space around us. Science 1997, 277:190-191. 10.1126/science.277.5323.190.
33. Kandula M., Hofman D., Chris Dijkerman H. Visuo-tactile interactions are dependent on the predictive value of the visual stimulus. Neuropsychologia 2014, 1-9. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.008.
34. Spence C., Driver J. Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention 2004, Oxford University Press, New York. 1st ed.
35. Rizzolatti G., Luppino G., Matelli M. The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 106:283-296. 10.1016/s0013-4694(98) 00022-4.
36. Rizzolatti G., Scandolara C., Matelli M., Gentilucci M. Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behav. Brain Res. 1981, 2:147-163. 10.1016/0166-4328(81) 90053-x.
37. Graziano M.S.A., Gross C.G. Visual responses with and without fixation: neurons in premotor cortex encode spatial locations independently of eye position. Exp. Brain Res. 1998, 118:373-380. 10.1007/s002210050291.
38. Duhamel J.R., Colby C.L., Goldberg M.E. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 79:126-136.
39. Graziano M.S.A., Hu X.T., Gross C.G. Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77:2268-2292.
40. Murray S.O., Boyaci H., Kersten D. The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:429-434. 10.1038/nn1641.
41. Valentini E., Kock K., Aglioti S.M. Seeing one's own painful hand positioned in the contralateral space reduces subjective reports of pain and modulates laser evoked potentials. J. Pain 2015.
42. Torta D.M., Legrain V., Mouraux A. Looking at the hand modulates the brain responses to nociceptive and non-nociceptive somatosensory stimuli but does not necessarily modulate their perception. Psychophysiology 2015, 52:1010-1018.