Inside the "black Box" of a Knowledge Translation Program in Applied Health Research

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1477-1491

  Heaton, Janet ^a   Day, Jo ^a   Britten, Nicky ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

community based programs; complexity; knowledge transfer; knowledge utilization; program evaluation; qualitative analysis; research collaborative; research dissemination and utilization; research qualitative

Indexed keywords

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84945175480     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732315580104     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baulcomb J. S., (2003). Management of change through force field analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 275-280. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00401.x
2. Boyle D., Harris M., (2009,). The challenge of co-production: How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services (Discussion paper). London: Nesta.
3. Byng R., Norman I., Redfern S., (2005). Using realistic evaluation to evaluate a practice-level intervention to improve primary healthcare for patients with long-term mental illness. Evaluation, 11, 69-93. doi: 10.1177/1356389005053198
4. Byrne D., (2013). Evaluating complex social interventions in a complex world. Evaluation, 19, 217-228. doi: 10.1177/1356389013495617
5. Conklin A., Hallsworth M., Hatziandreu E., Grant J., (2008). Briefing on linkage and exchange: Facilitating diffusion of innovation in health services (Occasional Paper prepared for Lord Darzi and the UK Department of Health). Cambridge: RAND Corporation.
6. Currie G., Lockett A., Enany N. E., (2013). From what we know to what we do: Lessons learned from the translational CLAHRC initiative in England. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18 (Suppl. 3), 27-39. doi: 10.1177/1355819613500484
7. D'Andreta D., Scarbrough H., Evans S., (2013). The enactment of knowledge translation: A study of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care initiative within the English National Health Service. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18 (Suppl. 3), 40-52. doi: 10.1177/1355819613499902
8. Davies H., Nutley S., Walter I., (2008). Why "knowledge transfer" is misconceived for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13, 188-190. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008055
9. Department of Health. (2007). Report of the high level group on clinical effectiveness (Tooke J., Chair). London: Author.
10. Elliot H., Popay J., (2000). How are policy makers using evidence? Models of research utilization and local NHS policy making. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54, 461-468. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.6.4
11. Geyer R., Rihani S., (2010). Complexity and public policy: A new approach to 21st century politics, policy and society. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
12. Greenhalgh T., Humphrey C., Hughes J., MacFarlane F., Butler C., Pawson R., (2009). How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-sale transformation in London. Milbank Quarterly, 87, 391-416. doi:10.1186%2f1748-5908-6-49
13. Innvaer S., Vist G., Trommald M., Oxman A., (2002). Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7, 239-244. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432778
14. Kothari A., Birch S., Charles C., (2005). "Interaction" and research utilization in health polities and programs: Does it work? Health Policy, 71, 117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.03.010
15. Kothari A., Wathen C. N., (2013). A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy, 109, 187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.004
16. Martin G. P., Ward V., Hendy J., Rowley E., Nancarrow S., Heaton J.,. Ariss S., (2011). The challenges of evaluating large-scale, multi-partner programmes: The case of NIHR CLAHRCs. Evidence & Policy, 7, 498-509. doi: 10.1332/174426411X603470
17. Mitchell P., Pirkis J., Hall J., Haas M., (2009). Partnerships for knowledge exchange in health services research, policy and practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 14, 104-111. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008091
18. Nicholson D., (2011). Innovation, health and wealth: Accelerating adoption and diffusion in the NHS. London: Department of Health.
19. Ostrom E., (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24, 1073-1087. doi: 10.1016/0305-750x(96)00023-x
20. Pawson R., (2013). The science of evaluation: A realist manifesto. London: Sage.
21. Pawson R., Manzano-Santaella A., (2012). A realist diagnostic workshop. Evaluation, 18, 176-191. doi: 10.1177/1356389012440912
22. Pawson R., Tilley N., (2008). Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE. (Original work published 1997)
23. Plsek P., (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century (Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Academies Press.
24. Rycroft-Malone J., Wilkinson J., Burton C. R., Harvey G., McCormack B., Graham I., Staniszewska S., (2013). Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations in Applied Health Research and Care: Towards a programme theory. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18 (Suppl. 3), 13-26. doi: 10.1177/1355819613498859
25. Social Care Institute for Excellence. (2013). Co-production in social care: What it is and how to do it (Adults' Services Guide 51). London: Author.
26. Soper B., Yaqub O., Hinrichs S., Marjanovich S., Drabble S., Hanney S., Nolte E., (2013). CLAHRCs in practice: Combined knowledge transfer and exchange strategies, cultural change, and experimentation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18 (Suppl. 3), 53-64. doi: 10.1177/1355819613499903
27. Tetroe J. M., Graham I. D., Foy R., Robinson N., Eccles M.P., Wensing M.,. Grimshaw J. M., (2008). Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: An international study. The Milbank Quarterly, 86, 125-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00515.x
28. Tilley N., (2000,). Realistic evaluation: An overview. Paper presented at the Founding Conference of the Danish Evaluation Society. Retrieved from http://evidence-basedmanagement.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/nick-tilley.pdf
29. Tilley N., (2004). Applying theory-driven evaluation to the British Crime Reduction Programme: The theories of the programme and of its evaluations. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 4, 255-276. doi: 10.1177/1466802504048465
30. Treasury H. M., (2006). A review of UK health research funding: Sir David Cooksey. London: Author.
31. Walshe K., Davies H. T. O., (2013). Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: From research production to knowledge mobilization. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18 (Suppl. 3), 1-12. doi: 10.1177/1355819613502011
32. Weiss C. H., (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39, 426-431. doi: 10.2307/3109916
33. Westhorp G., Prins E., Kusters C., Hultink M., Guijt I., Brouwers J., (2011). Realist evaluation: An overview report from an expert seminar with Dr. Gill Westhorp. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Centre for Development Innovation.