Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: A systematic review

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 598-606

  Turchetti, Giuseppe ^a   Palla, Ilaria ^a   Pierotti, Francesca ^a   Cuschieri, Alfred ^a  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

da Vinci; Direct manual laparoscopic surgery; Health economic evaluation

Indexed keywords

ADRENALECTOMY; BODY MASS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COLON RESECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DA VINCI ASSISTED ROBOTIC SURGERY; DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOPEXY; PROSTATECTOMY; PUBLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84857044875     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Institute of Medicine (1985) Assessing medical technologies. National Academy Press, Washington
2. Banta HD, Luce BR (1993) Health care technology and its assessment: an international perspective. Oxford University Press, New York
3. Goodman CS (2004) Introduction to health technology assessment. The Lewin Group, Falls Church
4. G Turchetti E Spadoni E Geisler 2010 Health technology assessment: evaluation of biomedical innovative technologies IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 29 70 76 20659860 10.1109/MEMB.2010.936553
5. Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1998) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. GI Barbash SA Glied 2010 New technology and health care costs: the case of robot-assisted surgery New Engl J Med 363 701 704 20818872 10.1056/NEJMp1006602 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVCrsbvJ
7. Centre For Reviews Dissemination (2008) CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, York
8. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
9. S Evers M Goossens H De Vet M Van Tulder A Ament 2005 Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: consensus on health economic criteria Int J Tech Assess Health Care 21 240 245 (Pubitemid 40656554)
10. Y Lotan JA Cadeddu MT Gettman 2004 The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques J Urol 172 1431 1435 15371862 10.1097/01.ju.0000139714.09832.47 (Pubitemid 39249737)
11. M Morino G Beninca G Giraudo GM Del Genio F Rebecchi C Garrone 2004 Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy Surg Endosc 18 1742 1746 15809781 10.1007/s00464-004-9046-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7nslamsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40576304)
12. J Heemskerk R van Dam WG van Gemert GL Beets JWM Greve MJHM Jacobs ND Bouvy 2006 First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci surgical system in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy Dig Surg 22 426 431 10.1159/000091445
13. M Morino L Pellegrino C Giaccone C Garrone F Rebecchi 2006 Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication Br J Surg 93 553 558 16552744 10.1002/bjs.5325 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283gvFChtA%3D%3D
14. I El Nakadi C Mélot J Closset V De Moor K Bétroune P Feron P Lingier M Gelin 2006 Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication: clinical results and cost minimization World J Surg 30 1050 1054 10.1007/s00268-005-7950- 6 (Pubitemid 43824418)
15. AL Rawlings JH Woodland RK Vegunta DL Crawford 2007 Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy Surg Endosc 21 1701 1708 17353988 10.1007/s00464-007- 9231-y 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srjsVCquw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47404103)
16. J Heemskerk DENM de Hoog WG van Gemert CGMI Baeten JWM Greve ND Bouvy 2007 Robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time Dis Colon Rectum 50 1825 1830 17690936 10.1007/s10350-007-9017-2 (Pubitemid 350077096)
17. S Breitenstein A Nocito M Puhan U Held M Weber PA Clavien 2008 Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study Ann Surg 247 987 993 18520226 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318172501f (Pubitemid 351770419)
18. BJ Park RM Flores 2008 Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy Thorac Surg Clin 18 297 300 18831506 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.05.003
19. D Sarlos L Kots N Stevanovic G Schaer 2010 Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150 92 96 20207063 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012
20. C Bolenz A Gupta T Hotze R Ho JA Cadeddu CG Roehrborn Y Lotan 2010 Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Eur Eurol 57 453 458
21. AL de Souza LM Prasad SJ Marecik J Blumetti JJ Park A Zimmern H Abcarian 2010 Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance Dis Colon Rectum 53 1611 1617 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f22f1f
22. Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, Zhang X, Wang Z, Ren S, Chen XF (2011) Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot. doi: 10.1002/rcs.380. Epub ahead of print PubMed PMID: 21412963
23. D'Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Mazzocchi P, Lucandri G, Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Sovernigo G (2011) Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res 166:e113-e120. Epub 13 Dec 2010. PubMed PMID: 21227455
24. A Horiguchi I Uyama S Miyakawa 2011 Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18 287 291 20811915 10.1007/s00534-010-0325-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M3nvFOhsg%3D%3D
25. H Hur JY Kim YK Cho SU Han 2010 Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20 693 697 20809816 10.1089/lap.2010.0246
26. P Erdeljan Y Caumartin J Warren C Nguan L Nott PP Luke SE Pautler 2010 Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: follow-up of first Canadian experience with comparison of outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons J Endourol 24 1447 1450 20677915 10.1089/end.2009.0617
27. P Stádler L Dvoracek P Vitasek P Matous 2010 Robotic vascular surgery: 150 cases Int J Med Robot 6 394 398 20652874 10.1002/rcs.344
28. P Stádler 2009 Role of the robot in totally laparoscopic aortic repair for occlusive and aneurysmal disease Acta Chir Belg 109 300 305 19943583
29. F Huettner D Dynda M Ryan J Doubet DL Crawford 2010 Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a useful tool in resident training: the Peoria experience, 2002-2009 Int J Med Robot 6 386 393 20687050 10.1002/rcs.342