A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-term outcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1254-1259

  Luna, Renato A ^a,b,d   Nogueira, Daniel B ^a   Varela, Pablo S ^a   De O Rodrigues Neto, Eduardo ^a   Norton, Maria Júlia R ^a   Do Carmo B Ribeiro, Luciana ^a   Peixoto, Agatha M ^a   De Mendonça, Yara L ^a   Bendet, Isidro ^c   Fiorelli, Rossano A ^d   Dolan, James P ^b  

^a Division of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology Department of Surgery   (Brazil)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Immunology section of the Sergio Franco Laboratory   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Inflammatory response; Laparoscopy; Postoperative pain; SILS; Single incision; Single port

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; C REACTIVE PROTEIN; INTERLEUKIN 6; TRAMADOL;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE INFLAMMATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INFECTION; WOUND DRESSING;

EID: 84876283137     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2589-5     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Glaser F, Sannwald GA, Buhr HJ, Kuntz C, Mayer H, Klee F, Herfarth C (1995) General stress response to conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 221(4):372-380
2. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Moore FA, Peterson VM (1996) Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation? Ann Surg 224(5):647-664
3. Pfluke JM, Parker M, Stauffer JA, Paetau AA, Bowers SP, Asbun HJ, Smith CD (2011) Laparoscopic surgery performed through a single incision: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg 212(1):113-118
4. Spaw AT, Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1991) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(1):2-7
5. Lin E, Calvano SE, Lowry SF (2000) Inflammatory cytokines and cell response in surgery. Surgery 127(2):117-126
6. Vittimberga FJ Jr, Foley DP, Meyers WC, Callery MP (1998) Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 227(3):326-334
7. Bruce DM, Smith M, Walker CB, Heys SD, Binnie NR, Gough DB, Broom J, Eremin O (1999) Minimal access surgery for cholelithiasis induces an attenuated acute phase response. Am J Surg 178(3):232-234
8. Kristiansson M, Saraste L, Soop M, Sundqvist KG, Thörne A (1999) Diminished interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein responses to laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43(2):146-152
9. McGregor CG, Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, Wright VJ, Purkayastha S, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2011) Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15(4):614-622
10. Solomon D, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE (2010) Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve. Surg Endosc 24(12):2954-2957
11. Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201(3):369-372 discussion 372-373
12. Aprea G, Coppola Bottazzi E, Guida F, Masone S, Persico G (2011) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res 166(2):e109-e112
13. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single trans-umbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 24(8):1842-1848
14. Asakuma M, Hayashi M, Komeda K, Shimizu T, Hirokawa F, Miyamoto Y, Okuda J, Tanigawa N (2011) Impact of single-port cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg 98(7):991-995
15. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammill CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254(1):22-27
16. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, Yih PC, Chan OC, Li MK (2011) Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 202(3):254-258
17. Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, Denoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S (2011) Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z
18. Fronza JS, Linn JG, Nagle AP, Soper NJ (2010) A single institution's experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 148(4):731-734 discussion 734-736
19. Curcillo PG 2nd, Wu AS, Podolsky ER, Graybeal C, Katkhouda N, Saenz A, Dunham R, Fendley S, Neff M, Copper C, Bessler M, Gumbs AA, Norton M, Iannelli A, Mason R, Moazzez A, Cohen L, Mouhlas A, Poor A (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24(8):1854-1860
20. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0