Implant Stability and Bone Remodeling after 3 and 13 Days of Implantation with an Initial Static Strain

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 383-393

  Halldin, Anders ^a,b   Jimbo, Ryo ^a   Johansson, Carina B ^c   Wennerberg, Ann ^a   Jacobsson, Magnus ^a,b   Albrektsson, Tomas ^d,e   Hansson, Stig ^b  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Astra Tech AB   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^e MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Animal model; Bone resorption; Implant stability

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

BONE REMODELING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; TOOTH IMPLANT;

BONE REMODELING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS;

EID: 84944865728     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12000     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Cullen DM, Smith RT, Akhter MP. Bone-loading response varies with strain magnitude and cycle number. J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 2001; 91:1971-1976.
2. Goodship AE, Lanyon LE, McFie H. Functional adaptation of bone to increased stress. An experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61:539-546.
3. Mosley JR, Lanyon LE. Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone 1998; 23:313-318.
4. Qin YX, Rubin CT, McLeod KJ. Nonlinear dependence of loading intensity and cycle number in the maintenance of bone mass and morphology. J Orthop Res 1998; 16:482-489.
5. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66:397-402.
6. Rubin CT, Sommerfeldt DW, Judex S, Qin Y. Inhibition of osteopenia by low magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli. Drug Discov Today 2001; 6:848-858.
7. Turner CH, Owan I, Takano Y. Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. Am J Physiol 1995; 269:E438-E442.
8. Halldin A, Jimbo R, Johansson CB, etal. The effect of static bone strain on implant stability and bone remodeling. Bone 2011; 49:783-789.
9. Lynch JA, Silva MJ. In vivo static creep loading of the rat forelimb reduces ulnar structural properties at time-zero and induces damage-dependent woven bone formation. Bone 2008; 42:942-949.
10. Perren SM, Huggler A, Russenberger M, etal. The reaction of cortical bone to compression. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1969; 125:19-29.
11. Gibson LJ. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech 1985; 18:317-328.
12. Reilly DT, Burstein AH. Review article. The mechanical properties of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56:1001-1022.
13. Currey JD. Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behaviour by mineral content. J Biomech 2004; 37:549-556.
14. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75:1193-1205.
15. McElhaney JH. Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue. J Appl Physiol 1966; 21:1231-1236.
16. Cochran DL. The evidence for immediate loading of implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2006; 6:155-163.
17. Stanford CM. Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation. Int J Mol Sci 2010; 11:354-369.
18. Bashutski JD, D'Silva NJ, Wang HL. Implant compression necrosis: current understanding and case report. J Periodontal Res 2009; 80:700-704.
19. Norton MR. The influence of insertion torque on the survival of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:1333-1343.
20. Isaksson H, Malkiewicz M, Nowak R, Helminen HJ, Jurvelin JS. Rabbit cortical bone tissue increases its elastic stiffness but becomes less viscoelastic with age. Bone 2010; 47:1030-1038.
21. Lakes RS, Katz JL, Sternstein SS. Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone - I. Torsional and biaxial studies. J Biomech 1979; 12:657-678.
22. Cordey J, Blumlein H, Ziegler W, Perren SM. Study of the behavior in the course of time of the holding power of cortical screws in vivo. Acta Orthop Belg 1976; 42(Suppl 1):75-87.
23. Johansson CB, Jimbo R, Stefenson P. Ex vivo and in vivo biomechanical test of implant attachment to various materials: introduction of a new user-friendly removal torque equipment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 14:603-611.
24. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11:318-326.
25. Johansson CB, Morberg P. Importance of ground section thickness for reliable histomorphometrical results. Biomaterials 1995; 16:91-95.
26. Zioupos P, Hansen U, Currey JD. Microcracking damage and the fracture process in relation to strain rate in human cortical bone tensile failure. J Biomech 2008; 41:2932-2939.
27. Bentolila V, Boyce TM, Fyhrie DP, Drumb R, Skerry TM, Schaffler MB. Intracortical remodeling in adult rat long bones after fatigue loading. Bone 1998; 23:275-281.
28. Burr DB, Martin RB, Schaffler MB, Radin EL. Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech 1985; 18:189-200.
29. Mori S, Burr DB. Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage. Bone 1993; 14:103-109.
30. Frost HM. From Wolff's law to the Utah paradigm: insights about bone physiology and its clinical applications. Anat Rec 2001; 262:398-419.
31. Parfitt AM. Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling: the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem 1994; 55:273-286.
32. Slaets E, Carmeliet G, Naert I, Duyck J. Early cellular responses in cortical bone healing around unloaded titanium implants: an animal study. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1015-1024.
33. Albrektsson T. Repair of bone grafts. A vital microscopic and histological investigation in the rabbit. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 14:1-12.
34. Garetto LP, Chen J, Parr JA, Roberts WE. Remodeling dynamics of bone supporting rigidly fixed titanium implants: a histomorphometric comparison in four species including humans. Implant Dent 1995; 4:235-243.
35. Roberts WE, Turley PK, Brezniak N, Fielder PJ. Implants: bone physiology and metabolism. J Calif Dent Assoc 1987; 15:54-61.
36. Roberts WE, Huja S, Roberts J. Bone modeling: biomechanics, molecular mechanisms, and clinical perspectives. Semin Orthod 2004; 10:123-161.
37. Schulte FA, Lambers FM, Kuhn G, Muller R. In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging. Bone 2011; 48:433-442.
38. Martin MJ, Buckland-Wright JC. Sensitivity analysis of a novel mathematical model identifies factors determining bone resorption rates. Bone 2004; 35:918-928.
39. Shimizu H, Sakamoto M, Sakamoto S. Bone resorption by isolated osteoclasts in living versus devitalized bone: differences in mode and extent and the effects of human recombinant tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases. J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5:411-418.
40. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO. The four biomechanical stages of fracture repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59:188-192.