Game theory paradigm: A new tool for investigating social dysfunction in major depressive disorders

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Volumn 6, Issue SEP, 2015, Pages

  Wang, Yun ^a,b   Yang, Liu Qing ^a,b   Li, Shu ^a   Zhou, Yuan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Game theory; Major depressive disorder; Social dysfunction; Social interaction; Ultimatum game

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN RECEPTOR; SEROTONIN;

ALTRUISM; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ANTERIOR INSULA; ANXIETY DISORDER; COGNITION; COOPERATION; CORPUS STRIATUM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DICTATOR GAME; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; DORSAL RAPHE NUCLEUS; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; DORSOMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GAIN LOSS CONTEXT; GAIN LOSS FRAME; GAME; GENETIC REASSORTMENT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GROUP OPINION; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; HYPERSCANNING; HYPOTHESIS; INCOME; INFERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; LATERAL ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; LEARNING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MEDIAL ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MIDDLE FRONTAL GYRUS; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROIMAGING; OXTR GENE; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PRECUNEUS; PRISONER DILEMMA GAME; RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SELF PROFIT; SEROTONIN UPTAKE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DISABILITY; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL NAVIGATION HYPOTHESIS; SOCIAL NORM; SOCIAL STATUS; STAKE SIZE; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TRUST; TRUST GAME; ULTIMATUM GAME; VENTROLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; VENTROMEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX;

EID: 84944723735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16640640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00128     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. American Psychiatric Association. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM 5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (2013).
2. Hirschfeld R, Montgomery SA, Keller MB, Kasper S, Schatzberg AF, M�ller HJ, et al. Social functioning in depression: a review. J Clin Psychiatry (2000) 61(4):268-75. doi:10.4088/JCP.v61n0405
3. Cusi AM, Nazarov A, Holshausen K, MacQueen GM, McKinnon MC. Systematic review of the neural basis of social cognition in patients with mood disorders. J Psychiatry Neurosci (2012) 37(3):154. doi:10.1503/jpn.100179
4. Ladegaard N, Larsen ER, Videbech P, Lysaker PH. Higher-order social cognition in first-episode major depression. Psychiatry Res (2014) 216(1):37-43. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.010
5. Weightman MJ, Air TM, Baune BT. A review of the role of social cognition in major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry (2014) 5:179. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00179
6. Sharp C, Monterosso J, Montague PR. Neuroeconomics: a bridge for translational research. Biol Psychiatry (2012) 72(2):87-92. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.02.029
7. Meyer-Lindenberg A. Trust me on this. Science (2008) 321(5890):778-80. doi:10.1126/science.1162908
8. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition). Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press (2007).
9. Kishida KT, King-Casas B, Montague PR. Neuroeconomic approaches to mental disorders. Neuron (2010) 67(4):543-54. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.021
10. Camerer C. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2003).
11. G�th W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ (1982) 3(4):367-88. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
12. Glimcher PW, Fehr E. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. London: Academic Press (2013).
13. Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science (2003) 300(5626):1755-8. doi:10.1126/science.1082976
14. Tabibnia G, Satpute AB, Lieberman MD. The sunny side of fairness preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychol Sci (2008) 19(4):339-47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02091.x
15. Wright ND, Symmonds M, Fleming SM, Dolan RJ. Neural segregation of objective and contextual aspects of fairness. J Neurosci (2011) 31(14):5244-52. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3138-10.2011
16. Gabay AS, Radua J, Kempton MJ, Mehta MA. The ultimatum game and the brain: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2014) 47:549-58. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.014
17. Feng C, Luo YJ, Krueger F. Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimate game: a coordinate-based meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp (2015) 36(2):591-602. doi:10.1002/hbm.22649
18. Cason TN, Mui V-L. Social influence in the sequential dictator game. J Math Psychol (1998) 42(2):248-65. doi:10.1006/jmps.1998.1213
19. Weiland S, Hewig J, Hecht H, Mussel P, Miltner WH. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining. Soc Neurosci (2012) 7(5):537-51. doi:10.1080/17470919.2012.674056
20. Zheng H, Zhu L. Neural mechanism of proposer's decision-making in the ultimatum and dictator games. Neural Regen Res (2013) 8(4):357. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.04.008
21. Ruff CC, Ugazio G, Fehr E. Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation. Science (2013) 342(6157):482-4. doi:10.1126/science.1241399
22. Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ Behav (1995) 10(1):122-42. doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027
23. Krueger F, Grafman J, McCabe K. Neural correlates of economic game playing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2008) 363(1511):3859-74. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0165
24. Krueger F, McCabe K, Moll J, Kriegeskorte N, Zahn R, Strenziok M, et al. Neural correlates of trust. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 104(50):20084-9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710103104
25. McCabe K, Houser D, Ryan L, Smith V, Trouard T. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2001) 98(20):11832-5. doi:10.1073/pnas.211415698
26. Tzieropoulos H. The trust game in neuroscience: a short review. Soc Neurosci (2013) 8(5):407-16. doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.832375
27. van den Bos W, van Dijk E, Westenberg M, Rombouts SA, Crone EA. What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the trust game. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2009) 4(3):294-304. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp009
28. Sally D. Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas a meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Ration Soc (1995) 7(1):58-92. doi:10.1177/1043463195007001004
29. Rilling JK, Gutman DA, Zeh TR, Pagnoni G, Berns GS, Kilts CD. A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron (2002) 35(2):395-405. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00755-9
30. Rilling JK, Sanfey AG, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD. The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. Neuroimage (2004) 22(4):1694-703. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.015
31. Rilling JK, Goldsmith DR, Glenn AL, Jairam MR, Elfenbein HA, Dagenais JE, et al. The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation. Neuropsychologia (2008) 46(5):1256-66. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.033
32. Bechler, C. (2013). Choices in Two-Person Interactions: The Effect of Amount and Social Distance on Offers in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games. Undergraduate Honors thesis, Washington University, St. Louis.
33. Cameron LA. Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: experimental evidence from Indonesia. Econ Inq (1999) 37(1):47-59. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01415.x
34. Hoffman E, McCabe KA, Smith VL. On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. Int J Game Theor (1996) 25(3):289-301. doi:10.1007/BF02425259
35. Munier B, Zaharia C. High stakes and acceptance behavior in ultimatum bargaining. Theory Decis (2002) 53(3):187-207. doi:10.1023/A:1022815832351
36. Slonim R, Roth AE. Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: an experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica (1998) 66:569-96. doi:10.2307/2998575
37. Straub PG, Murnighan JK. An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. J Econ Behav Organ (1995) 27(3):345-64. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)00072-M
38. Zhou Y, Wang Y, Rao L-L, Yang L-Q, Li S. Money talks: neural substrate of modulation of fairness by monetary incentives. Front Behav Neurosci (2014) 8:150. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00150
39. Falk A, Fehr E, Fischbacher U. On the nature of fair behavior. Econ Inq (2003) 41(1):20-6. doi:10.1093/ei/41.1.20
40. Buchan N, Croson R, Johnson E, Wu G. Gain and loss ultimatums. Adv Appl Microecon (2005) 13:1-23. doi:10.1016/S0278-0984(05)13001-6
41. Zhou X, Wu Y. Sharing losses and sharing gains: increased demand for fairness under adversity. J Exp Soc Psychol (2011) 47(3):582-8. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.017
42. Guo X, Zheng L, Zhu L, Li J, Wang Q, Dienes Z, et al. Increased neural responses to unfairness in a loss context. Neuroimage (2013) 77:246-53. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.048
43. Wu Y, Yu H, Shen B, Yu R, Zhou Z, Zhang G, et al. Neural basis of increased costly norm enforcement under adversity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2014) 9(12):1862-71. doi:10.1093/scan/nst187
44. De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science (2006) 313(5787):684-7. doi:10.1126/science.1128356
45. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263-91. doi:10.2307/1914185
46. Leliveld MC, van Dijk E, van Beest I. Initial ownership in bargaining: introducing the giving, splitting, and taking ultimatum bargaining game. Pers Soc Psychol Bull (2008) 34(9):1214-25. doi:10.1177/0146167208318600
47. Sarlo M, Lotto L, Palomba D, Scozzari S, Rumiati R. Framing the ultimatum game: gender differences and autonomic responses. Int J Psychol (2013) 48(3):263-71. doi:10.1080/00207594.2012.656127
48. Wu Y, Hu J, van Dijk E, Leliveld MC, Zhou X. Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: does the initial ownership play a role? PLoS One (2012) 7(6):e39627. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039627
49. Tomasino B, Lotto L, Sarlo M, Civai C, Rumiati R, Rumiati RI. Framing the ultimatum game: the contribution of simulation. Front Hum Neurosci (2013) 7:337. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00337
50. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu Rev Psychol (2004) 55:591-621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
51. Turner JC. Social Influence. Buckingham: Open University Press (1991).
52. Grosskopf B. Reinforcement and directional learning in the ultimatum game with responder competition. Exp Econ (2003) 6(2):141-58. doi:10.1023/A:1025305020751
53. Wei Z, Zhao Z, Zheng Y. Neural mechanisms underlying social conformity in an ultimatum game. Front Hum Neurosci (2013) 7:896. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00896
54. Zink CF, Tong Y, Chen Q, Bassett DS, Stein JL, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron (2008) 58(2):273-83. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.025
55. Chiao JY. Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2010) 20(6):803-9. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.006
56. Chiao JY, Bordeaux AR, Ambady N. Mental representations of social status. Cognition (2004) 93(2):B49-57. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.07.008
57. Hu J, Cao Y, Blue PR, Zhou X. Low social status decreases the neural salience of unfairness. Front Behav Neurosci (2014) 8:402. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00402
58. Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK. Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process (1996) 68(3):208-24. doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.586902
59. Harl� KM, Sanfey AG. Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the ultimatum game. Emotion (2007) 7(4):876. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.876
60. Harl� K. How Does Sad Mood Affect Responses to Unfairness in Social Economic Decisions? A Neurophysiological Investigation. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona (2011).
61. van't Wout M, Chang LJ, Sanfey AG. The influence of emotion regulation on social interactive decision-making. Emotion (2010) 10(6):815. doi:10.1037/a0020069
62. Xiao E, Houser D. Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2005) 102(20):7398-401. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502399102
63. Grecucci A, Giorgetta C, van't Wout M, Bonini N, Sanfey A. Reappraising the ultimatum: an fMRI study of emotion regulation and decision making. Cereb Cortex (2013) 23(2):399-410. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs028
64. Chen J, Zhong J, Zhang Y, Li P, Zhang A, Tan Q, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior. Neurosci Lett (2012) 517(2):65-70. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.082
65. Tortosa MI, Lupi��ez J, Ruz M. Race, emotion and trust: an ERP study. Brain Res (2013) 1494:44-55. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.11.037
66. Anderhub V, Engelmann D, G�th W. An experimental study of the repeated trust game with incomplete information. J Econ Behav Organ (2002) 48(2):197-216. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00216-5
67. Klackl J, Pfundmair M, Agroskin D, Jonas E. Who is to blame? Oxytocin promotes nonpersonalistic attributions in response to a trust betrayal. Biol Psychol (2013) 92(2):387-94. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.010
68. Mikolajczak M, Gross JJ, Lane A, Corneille O, de Timary P, Luminet O. Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psychol Sci (2010) 21(8):1072-4. doi:10.1177/0956797610377343
69. Zak PJ, Kurzban R, Matzner WT. Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Horm Behav (2005) 48(5):522-7. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.009
70. Krueger F, Parasuraman R, Iyengar V, Thornburg M, Weel J, Lin M, et al. Oxytocin receptor genetic variation promotes human trust behavior. Front Hum Neurosci (2012) 6:4. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00004
71. Bartz JA, Zaki J, Bolger N, Ochsner KN. Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn Sci (2011) 15(7):301-9. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002
72. Alesina A, La Ferrara E. Who trusts others? J Public Econ (2002) 85(2):207-34. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6
73. Tzieropoulos H, De Peralta RG, Bossaerts P, Andino SLG. The impact of disappointment in decision making: inter-individual differences and electrical neuroimaging. Front Hum Neurosci (2010) 4:235. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00235
74. Kval�y O, Luzuriaga M. A Trust Game in Loss Domain. Norway: University of Stavanger (2014).
75. Ma Q, Meng L, Shen Q. You have my word: reciprocity expectation modulates feedback-related negativity in the trust game. PLoS One (2015) 10(2):e0119129. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119129
76. Bischoff I, Ihtiyar �. Feedback and Emotions in the Trust Game. Marburg: Philipps-Universit�t Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung) (2015).
77. Knoch D, Schneider F, Schunk D, Hohmann M, Fehr E. Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106(49):20895-9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911619106
78. Shinada M, Yamagishi T. Physical attractiveness and cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma game. Evol Hum Behav (2014) 35(6):451-5. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.06.003
79. Reed LI, Zeglen KN, Schmidt KL. Facial expressions as honest signals of cooperative intent in a one-shot anonymous prisoner's dilemma game. Evol Hum Behav (2012) 33(3):200-9. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.003
80. Normann HT, Wallace B. The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma experiment. Int J Game Theor (2012) 41(3):707-18. doi:10.1007/s00182-012-0341-y
81. Wood RM, Rilling JK, Sanfey AG, Bhagwagar Z, Rogers RD. Effects of tryptophan depletion on the performance of an iterated prisoner's dilemma game in healthy adults. Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31(5):1075-84. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300932
82. Declerck C, Boone C, Kiyonari T. The effect of oxytocin on cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma depends on the social context and a person's social value orientation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2014) 9(6):802-9. doi:10.1093/scan/nst040
83. Van Dyken JD, M�ller MJ, Mack KM, Desai MM. Spatial population expansion promotes the evolution of cooperation in an experimental prisoner's dilemma. Curr Biol (2013) 23(10):919-23. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.026
84. Gotlib IH, Krasnoperova E, Yue DN, Joormann J. Attentional biases for negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depression. J Abnorm Psychol (2004) 113(1):127. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.121
85. Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol (2005) 1:293-319. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938
86. Agay N, Kron S, Carmel Z, Mendlovic S, Levkovitz Y. Ultimatum bargaining behavior of people affected by schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res (2008) 157(1):39-46. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2006.03.026
87. Destoop M, Schrijvers D, De Grave C, Sabbe B, De Bruijn ER. Better to give than to take? Interactive social decision-making in severe major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord (2012) 137(1):98-105. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.010
88. Gradin V, P�rez A, MacFarlane J, Cavin I, Waiter G, Engelmann J, et al. Abnormal brain responses to social fairness in depression: an fMRI study using the ultimatum game. Psychol Med (2015) 45(6):1241-51. doi:10.1017/S0033291714002347
89. Harl� KM, Allen JJ, Sanfey AG. The impact of depression on social economic decision making. J Abnorm Psychol (2010) 119(2):440. doi:10.1037/a0018612
90. Scheele D, Mihov Y, Schwederski O, Maier W, Hurlemann R. A negative emotional and economic judgment bias in major depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci (2013) 263(8):675-83. doi:10.1007/s00406-013-0392-5
91. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Li S, Wang P, Wu GW, Liu ZN. Impaired social decision making in patients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry (2014) 14(1):18. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-18
92. Couture SM, Penn DL, Roberts DL. The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: a review. Schizophr Bull (2006) 32(Suppl 1):S44-63. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbl029
93. Green MF, Kern RS, Braff DL, Mintz J. Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the "right stuff"? Schizophr Bull (2000) 26(1):119. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033430
94. G�roglu B, van den Bos W, Rombouts SA, Crone EA. Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2010) 5(4):414-23. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq013
95. Elliott R, Zahn R, Deakin JW, Anderson IM. Affective cognition and its disruption in mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology (2011) 36(1):153-82. doi:10.1038/npp.2010.77
96. Zhang W, Chang S, Guo L, Zhang K, Wang J. The neural correlates of reward-related processing in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Affect Disord (2013) 151(2):531-9. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.039
97. King-Casas B, Tomlin D, Anen C, Camerer CF, Quartz SR, Montague PR. Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science (2005) 308(5718):78-83. doi:10.1126/science.1108062
98. Bjorkquist OA, Herbener ES. Social perception in schizophrenia: evidence of temporo-occipital and prefrontal dysfunction. Psychiatry Res (2013) 212(3):175-82. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.12.002
99. Crockett MJ, Clark L, Hauser MD, Robbins TW. Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 107(40):17433-8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1009396107
100. C�ceda R, Moskovciak T, Prendes-Alvarez S, Wojas J, Engel A, Wilker SH, et al. Gender-specific effects of depression and suicidal ideation in prosocial behaviors. PLoS One (2014) 9(9):e108733. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108733
101. Shao R, Zhang HJ, Lee TM. The neural basis of social risky decision making in females with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychologia (2015) 67:100-10. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.009
102. Zhang HJ, Sun D, Lee T. Impaired social decision making in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav (2012) 2(4):415-23. doi:10.1002/brb3.62
103. Hokanson JE, Sacco WP, Blumberg SR, Landrum GC. Interpersonal behavior of depressive individuals in a mixed-motive game. J Abnorm Psychol (1980) 89(3):320. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.89.3.320
104. Haley WE, Strickland BR. Interpersonal betrayal and cooperation: effects on self-evaluation in depression. J Pers Soc Psychol (1986) 50(2):386-91. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.386
105. Surbey MK. Adaptive significance of low levels of self-deception and cooperation in depression. Evol Hum Behav (2011) 32(1):29-40. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.009
106. Clark CB, Thorne CB, Hardy S, Cropsey KL. Cooperation and depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord (2013) 150(3):1184-7. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.011
107. Pulcu E, Thomas E, Trotter P, McFarquhar M, Juhasz G, Sahakian B, et al. Social-economical decision making in current and remitted major depression. Psychol Med (2015) 45(6):1301-13. doi:10.1017/S0033291714002414
108. Ruff CC, Fehr E. The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci (2014) 15(8):549-62. doi:10.1038/nrn3776
109. Andrews PW, Thomson JA Jr. The bright side of being blue: depression as an adaptation for analyzing complex problems. Psychol Rev (2009) 116(3):620. doi:10.1037/a0016242
110. Hagen EH. Evolutionary theories of depression: a critical review. Can J Psychiatry (2011) 56(12):716-26.
111. Watson PJ, Andrews PW. Toward a revised evolutionary adaptationist analysis of depression: the social navigation hypothesis. J Affect Disord (2002) 72(1):1-14. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00459-1
112. Wexelblat A. Virtual Reality: Applications and Explorations. Boston, MA: Academic Press (1993).
113. Babiloni F, Astolfi L. Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: past, present and future. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (2014) 44:76-93. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.07.006
114. Kim H, Schnall S, Yi DJ, White MP. Social distance decreases responders' sensitivity to fairness in the ultimatum game. Judgm Decis Mak (2013) 8(5):632-8.
115. Baumgartner T, Knoch D, Hotz P, Eisenegger C, Fehr E. Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice. Nat Neurosci (2011) 14(11):1468-74. doi:10.1038/nn.2933
116. Knoch D, Nitsche MA, Fischbacher U, Eisenegger C, Pascual-Leone A, Fehr E. Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation-the example of punishing unfairness. Cereb Cortex (2008) 18(9):1987-90. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm237
117. Arnone D, McIntosh A, Ebmeier K, Munafo M, Anderson I. Magnetic resonance imaging studies in unipolar depression: systematic review and meta-regression analyses. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol (2012) 22(1):1-16. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.05.003
118. Harmer CJ. Serotonin and emotional processing: does it help explain antidepressant drug action? Neuropharmacology (2008) 55(6):1023-8. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.036
119. Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB. Role of serotonin in the pathophysiology of depression: focus on the serotonin transporter. Clin Chem (1994) 40(2):288-95.
120. Crockett MJ, Clark L, Tabibnia G, Lieberman MD, Robbins TW. Serotonin modulates behavioral reactions to unfairness. Science (2008) 320(5884):1739-1739. doi:10.1126/science.1155577
121. Emanuele E, Brondino N, Bertona M, Re S, Geroldi D. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game. Neurosci Lett (2008) 437(2):158-61. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.006
122. Takahashi H, Takano H, Camerer CF, Ideno T, Okubo S, Matsui H, et al. Honesty mediates the relationship between serotonin and reaction to unfairness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 109(11):4281-4. doi:10.1073/pnas.1118687109
123. Cesarini D, Dawes CT, Johannesson M, Lichtenstein P, Wallace B. Experimental game theory and behavior genetics. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2009) 1167(1):66-75. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04505.x
124. Wallace B, Cesarini D, Lichtenstein P, Johannesson M. Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 104(40):15631-4. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706642104
125. Cesarini D, Dawes CT, Fowler JH, Johannesson M, Lichtenstein P, Wallace B. Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 105(10):3721-6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710069105
126. Levinson DF. The genetics of depression: a review. Biol Psychiatry (2006) 60(2):84-92. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.024
127. Sullivan PF, Neale MC, Kendler KS. Genetic epidemiology of major depression: review and meta-analysis. Genet Epidemiol (2000) 157(10):1552-62. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1552
128. Csukly G, Polg�r P, Tombor L, R�thelyi J, K�ri S. Are patients with schizophrenia rational maximizers? Evidence from an ultimatum game study. Psychiatry Res (2011) 187(1):11-7. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.10.005
129. van't Wout M, Sanfey AG. Interactive decision-making in people with schizotypal traits: a game theory approach. Psychiatry Res (2011) 185(1):92-6. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.013
130. Wischniewski J, Br�ne M. Moral reasoning in schizophrenia: an explorative study into economic decision making. Cogn Neuropsychiatry (2011) 16(4):348-63. doi:10.1080/13546805.2010.539919
131. Grecucci A, Giorgetta C, Brambilla P, Zuanon S, Perini L, Balestrieri M, et al. Anxious ultimatums: how anxiety disorders affect socioeconomic behaviour. Cogn Emot (2013) 27(2):230-44. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.698982
132. Wu T, Luo Y, Broster LS, Gu R, Luo YJ. The impact of anxiety on social decision-making: behavioral and electrodermal findings. Soc Neurosci (2013) 8(1):11-21. doi:10.1080/17470919.2012.694372
133. Luo Y, Wu T, Broster LS, Feng C, Zhang D Gu R, et al. The temporal course of the influence of anxiety on fairness considerations. Psychophysiology (2014) 51(9):834-42. doi:10.1111/psyp.12235
134. Duek O, Osher Y, Belmaker RH, Bersudsky Y, Kofman O. Reward sensitivity and anger in euthymic bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res (2014) 215(1):95-100. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.028