Sample size and utility-difference precision in discrete-choice experiments: A meta-simulation approach

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 16, Issue , 2015, Pages 50-57

  Yang, Jui Chen ^a   Johnson, F Reed ^b   Kilambi, Vikram ^c   Mohamed, Ateesha F ^d  

^a Pacific Economic Research   (United States)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

^d Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944314471     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2015.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D.F. Alwin Margins of Error: A Study of Reliability in Survey Measurement 2007 Wiley-Interscience New York
2. T. Arentze, A. Borgers, H. Timmermans, and R. DelMistro Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 39 3 2003 229 244
3. M. Bech, T. Kjaer, and J. Lauridsen Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment Health Econ. 20 3 2011 273 286
4. J.F. Bridges, L. Dong, G. Gallego, B.M. Blauvelt, S.M. Joy, and T.M. Pawlik Prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia: a conjoint analysis BMC Health Serv. Res. 12 2012 376
5. J.F. Bridges, A.B. Hauber, D. Marshall, A. Lloyd, L.A. Prosser, D.A. Regier, and et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health - a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force Value Health 14 4 2011 403 413
6. S. Caussade, J. d Ortúzar, L.I. Rizzi, and D.A. Hensher Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 39 7 2005 565 658
7. E.W. de Bekker-Grob Sampel size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide Patient 2015 1 12
8. J.R. DeShazo, and G. Fermo Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 44 1 2002 123 143
9. D.A. Hensher How do respondents process stated choice experiments? Attribute consideration under varying information load J. Appl. Econom. 21 6 2006 861 878
10. D.A. Hensher Identifying the influence of stated choice design dimensionality on willingness to pay for travel time savings J. Transp. Econ. Policy 38 3 2004 425 446
11. D.A. Hensher Revealing differences in willingness to pay due to the dimensionality of stated choice designs: an initial assessment Environ. Resour. Econ. 34 1 2006 7 44
12. D.A. Hensher, J.M. Rose, and W.H. Greene Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
13. D.A. Hensher, P.R. Stopher, and J.J. Louviere An exploratory analysis of the effect of numbers of choice sets in designed choice experiments: an airline choice application J. Air Transp. Manag. 7 6 2001 373 379
14. J. Huber CBC design for practitioners: what matters most Sawtooth Software Conference 2012 Sawtooth Software Orlando, FL 207 221
15. L. Huicho, J. Miranda, F. Diez-Canseco, C. Lema, A. Lescano, M. Lagarde, and et al. Job preferences of nurses and midwives for taking up a rural job in Peru: a discrete choice experiment PLoS One 7 12 2012 e50315
16. F.R. Johnson, M.R. Banzhaf, and W.H. Desvousges Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach Health Econ. 9 4 2000 295 317
17. F.R. Johnson, W.H. Desvousges, M.C. Ruby, D. Stieb, and P. De Civita Eliciting stated health preferences: an application to willingness to pay for longevity Med. Decis. Mak. 18 Suppl. 2 1998 S57 S67
18. F.R. Johnson, E. Lancsar, D. Marshall, V. Kilambi, A. Mühlbacher, D.A. Regier, and et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force Value Health 16 1 2013 3 13
19. Johnson, R.M., Orme, B.K., 1996. How Many Questions Should You Ask In Choice-based DCE Studies? Advanced Research Techniques Forum of the American Marketing Association.
20. B. Kanninen Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments J. Mark. Res. 39 2 2002 214 227
21. R. Kessels, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments J. Mark. Res. 43 3 2006 409 419
22. J.J. Louviere, D.A. Hensher, and J.D. Swait Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
23. J.J. Louviere, T. Islam, N. Wasi, D. Street, and L. Burgess Designing discrete choice experiments: do optimal designs come at a price? J. Consum. Res. 35 2 2008 360 375
24. D. Marshall, J.F. Bridges, B. Hauber, R. Cameron, L. Donnalley, K. Fyie, and et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health-how are studies being designed and reported? an update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008 Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 3 4 2010 249 256
25. B.K. Orme Getting Started with DCE Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research 2nd ed. 2010 Research Publishers LLC Madison, WI
26. S. Ozdemir, A.F. Mohamed, F.R. Johnson, and A.B. Hauber Who pays attention in stated-choice surveys? Health Econ. 19 1 2010 111 118
27. J.M. Rose, and M.C. Bliemer Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments Transportation 40 5 2013 1021 1041
28. J.M. Rose, D.A. Hensher, S. Caussade, J. d Ortúzar, and R.-C. Jou Identifying differences in willingness to pay due to dimensionality in stated choice experiments: a cross country analysis J. Transp. Geogr. 17 1 2009 21 29
29. K. Sælensminde The impact of choice inconsistencies in stated choice studies Environ. Resour. Econ. 23 4 2002 403 420
30. J. Swait, and W. Adamowicz The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy switching J. Consum. Res. 28 1 2001 135 148