Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments

Transportation

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1021-1041

  Rose, John M ^a   Bliemer, Michiel C J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

D error; D optimality; Mixed Multinomial Logit model; S error; Sample size; Simple random sampling; Stated choice experiments

Indexed keywords

D-ERROR; D-OPTIMALITY; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; S-ERROR; SAMPLE SIZES; SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING; STATED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

DESIGN;

ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; LOGIT ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHOD; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84883135627     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-013-9451-z     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S. R.: Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985).
2. Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose J. M.,: Efficiency and Sample Size Requirements for Stated Choice Studies. Working paper ITLS-WP-05-08, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney (2005).
3. Bliemer, M. C. J, Rose J. M.,: Efficiency and sample size requirements for stated choice studies. Presented at the 88th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington DC (2009).
4. Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M., Hensher, D. A.: Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models. Transp. Res. Part B 43(1), 19-35 (2009).
5. Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M., Hess, S.: Approximation of Bayesian efficiency in experimental choice designs. J. Choice Model. 1(1), 98-127 (2008).
6. Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M.: Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice. Transp. Res. Part A. 45(1), 63-79 (2011).
7. Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M.: Construction of Experimental Designs for Mixed Logit Models Allowing for Correlation Across Choice Observations. Transp. Res. Part B. 46(3), 720-734 (2010).
8. Bunch, D. S., Louviere, J. J., Anderson, D.: A Comparison of Experimental Design Strategies for Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis with Generic-Attribute Multinomial Logit Models, Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis (1996).
9. Carlsson, F., Peter Martinsson, P.: Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ. 12(4), 281-294 (2003).
10. Garrod, G. D., Scarpa, R., Willis, K. G.: Estimating the benefits of traffic calming on through routes: a choice experiment approach. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 36(2), 211-232 (2002).
11. Hensher, D. A., Prioni, P.: A service quality index for area-wide contract performance assessment. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 36(1), 93-114 (2002).
12. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., Greene, W. H.: Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
13. Huber, J., Zwerina, K.: The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Mark. Res. 33, 307-317 (1996).
14. Johnson, R., Orme, B. (2003) Getting the most from CBC, Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sawtooth Software, Sequim.
15. Kanninen, B. J.: Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. J. Mark. Res. 39, 214-217 (2002).
16. Kessels, R., Bradley, B., Goos, P., Vandebroek, M.: An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 27(2), 279-291 (2009).
17. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J. D.: Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
18. Manski, C. F., McFadden, D.: Alternative Estimators and Sample Designs for Discrete Choice Analysis. In: Manski, C. F., McFadden, D. (eds.) Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, pp. 2-50. MIT Press, Cambridge (1981).
19. McFadden, D.: Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In: Griliches, Z., Intriligator, M. D. (eds.) Handbook of econometrics II, pp. 1395-1457. Elseviere Science, Amsterdam (1984).
20. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, (ed.) Frontiers in econometrics, pp. 105-142. Academic Press, New York (1974).
21. ChoiceMetrics (2012) Ngene 1. 1. 1 User Manual & Reference Guide, Australia, www. choice-metrics. com. Accessed 14 March 2012.
22. Orme, B. (1998) Sample size issues for conjoint analysis studies, Sawtooth Software Technical Paper, Sequim.
23. Orme, B. (2010) Sample Size Issues for Conjoint Analysis Studies, Sawtooth Software Technical Paper, Sequim.
24. Quan, W., Rose, J. M., Collins, A. T., Bliemer, M. C. J.: A comparison of Algorithms for Generating Efficient Choice Experiments, Working Paper ITLS-WP-11-19. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney, Sydney (2011).
25. Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C. J.: Sample Optimality in the Design of Stated Choice Experiments, Working paper ITLS-WP-05-13. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The Univesrity of Sydney, Sydney (2005a).
26. Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C. J.: Constructing Efficient Choice Experiments, Working Paper, ITLS-WP-05-07. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney, Sydney (2005b).
27. Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C. J., Hensher, D. A., Collins, A. T.: Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transp. Res. Part B 42(4), 396-406 (2008).
28. Sándor, Z., Wedel, M.: Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs. J. Mark. Res. 38, 430-444 (2001).
29. Sándor, Z., Wedel, M.: Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Science 21(4), 455-476 (2002).
30. Yu, J., Goos, P. P., Vandebroek, M.: Efficient conjoint choice designs in the presence of respondent heterogeneity. Marketing Science 28, 122-135 (2009).