A mouse informatics platform for phenotypic and translational discovery

Mammalian Genome

Volumn 26, Issue 9-10, 2015, Pages 413-421

  Ring, Natalie ^a   Meehan, Terrence F ^b   Blake, Andrew ^a   Brown, James ^a   Chen, Chao Kung ^b   Conte, Nathalie ^b   Di Fenza, Armida ^a   Fiegel, Tanja ^a   Horner, Neil ^a   Jacobsen, Julius O B ^c   Karp, Natasha ^c   Lawson, Thomas ^a   Mason, Jeremy C ^b   Matthews, Peter ^c   Morgan, Hugh ^a   Relac, Mike ^b   Santos, Luis ^a   Smedley, Damian ^c   Sneddon, Duncan ^a   Pengelly, Alice ^a   Tudose, Ilinca ^b   Warren, Jonathan W G ^b   Westerberg, Henrik ^a   Yaikhom, Gagarine ^a   Parkinson, Helen ^b   Mallon, Ann Marie ^a   more..

^a MRC MAMMALIAN GENETICS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC DISORDER; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MOUSE MODEL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; TERATOLOGY; THROMBOCYTE COUNT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; GENETICS; INBRED MOUSE STRAIN; MOUSE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENOME; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MICE, KNOCKOUT; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84943818565     PISSN: 09388990     EISSN: 14321777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00335-015-9599-2     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Allan C, Burel J-M, Moore J et al (2012) OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat Methods 9:245–253
2. Beaulieu CL, Majewski J, Schwartzentruber J et al (2014) FORGE Canada Consortium: outcomes of a 2-year national rare-disease gene-discovery project. Am J Hum Genet 94(6):809–817. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.05.003
3. Bradley A, Anastassiadis K et al (2012) The mammalian gene function resource: the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Mamm Genome 23(9–10):580–586. doi:10.1007/s00335-012-9422-2
4. Brown SDM, Moore MW (2012a) The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping. Mamm Genome 23:632–640
5. Brown SDM, Moore MW (2012b) Towards an encyclopaedia of mammalian gene function: the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Dis Models Mech 5:289–292
6. Karp NA, Meehan TF, Morgan H et al (2015) Applying the ARRIVE Guidelines to an In Vivo Database. PLoS Biol 13(5):e1002151. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002151
7. Koscielny G, Yaikhom G, Iyer V et al (2014) The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium Web Portal, a unified point of access for knockout mice and related phenotyping data. Nucl Acids Res 42:D802–D809. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt977
8. Kurbatova N, Karp N, Mason J (2015) PhenStat: statistical analysis of phenotypic data. R package version 2.2.0
9. Lloyd KC (2011) A knockout mouse resource for the biomedical research community. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1245:24–26. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06311.x
10. Mallon AM, Iyer V, Melvin D, Morgan H, Parkinson H, Brown SDM, Flicek P, Skarnes WC (2012) Accessing data from the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: state of the art and future plans. Mamm Genome 23:641–652
11. Metscher BD (2009) MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol 9:11. doi:10.1186/1472-6793-9-11
12. Morgan H, Beck T, Blake A et al (2010) EuroPhenome: a repository for high-throughput mouse phenotyping data. Nucl Acids Res 38:D577–D585
13. Ringwald M, Iyer V, Mason JC et al (2011) The IKMC web portal: a central point of entry to data and resources from the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Nucl Acids Res 39:D849–D855
14. Robinson PN, Köhler S, Oellrich A et al (2014) Improved exome prioritization of disease genes through cross-species phenotype comparison. Genome Res 24(2):340–348. doi:10.1101/gr.160325.113
15. Sharpe J, Ahlgren U, Perry P, Hill B (2002) Optical projection tomography as a tool for 3D microscopy and gene expression studies. Science 296:541–545. doi:10.1126/science.1068206
16. Smedley D, Oellrich A, Köhler S et al (2013) PhenoDigm: analyzing curated annotations to associate animal models with human diseases. Database. article ID bat025; doi:10.1093/database/bat025
17. Smith CL, Eppig JT (2009) The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology: enabling robust annotation and comparative analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev 1(3):390–399. doi:10.1002/wsbm.44
18. Smith CM, Finger JH, Hayamizu TF, McCright IJ, Xu J, Berghout J, Campbell J, Corbani LE, Forthofer KL, Frost PJ (2014) The mouse gene expression database (GXD): 2014 update. Nucl Acids Res 42(D1):D818–D824
19. Vilella AJ, Severin J, Ureta-Vidal A, Durbin L, Heng L, Birney E (2009) EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: analysis of complete, duplication-aware phylogenetics trees in vertebrates. Genome Res 19:327–335. doi:10.1101/gr.073585.107
20. Weninger WJ, Geyer SH, Martineau A et al (2014) Phenotyping structural abnormalities in mouse embryos using high-resolution episcopic microscopy. Dis Model Mech 7:1143–1152. doi:10.1242/dmm.016337
21. Wilkinson P, Sengerova J, Matteoni R et al (2010) EMMA—mouse mutant resources for the international scientific community. Nucl Acids Res 38(S1):D570–D576. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp799
22. Wong MD, Dorr AE, Walls JR et al (2012) A novel 3D mouse embryo atlas based on micro-CT. Development 139:3248–3256. doi:10.1242/dev.082016
23. Wong MD, Maezawa Y, Lerch JP, Henkelman RM (2014) Automated pipeline for anatomical phenotyping of mouse embryos using micro-CT. Development 141:1–9. doi:10.1242/dev.107722
24. Yaikhom G, Morgan H, Sneddon D et al (2015) Comparative visualisation of genotype-phenotype relationships. Nat Methods 12:698–699. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3477