Applying the ARRIVE Guidelines to an In Vivo Database

PLoS Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Karp, Natasha A ^a   Meehan, Terry F ^b   Morgan, Hugh ^c   Mason, Jeremy C ^b   Blake, Andrew ^c   Kurbatova, Natalja ^b   Smedley, Damian ^a   Jacobsen, Julius ^a   Mott, Richard F ^d   Iyer, Vivek ^a   Matthews, Peter ^a   Melvin, David G ^a   Wells, Sara ^c   Flenniken, Ann M ^e   Masuya, Hiroshi ^f   Wakana, Shigeharu ^f   White, Jacqueline K ^a   Lloyd, K C Kent ^g   Reynolds, Corey L ^h   Paylor, Richard ^h   West, David B ⁱ   Svenson, Karen L ^j   Chesler, Elissa J ^j   de Angelis, Martin Hrabě ^k,l   Tocchini Valentini, Glauco P ^m   Sorg, Tania ^n,o,p   Herault, Yann ^n,o,p   Parkinson, Helen ^b   Mallon, Ann Marie ^c   Brown, Steve D M ^c   more..

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c MRC MAMMALIAN GENETICS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^f RIKEN   (Japan)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OAKLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^j JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^k INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^l TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^m CNR Institute of Cellular Biology and Neurobiology   (Italy)

ⁿ CNRS   (France)

^o INSTITUT CLINIQUE DE LA SOURIS   (France)

^p INSTITUT DE GÉNÉTIQUE ET DE BIOLOGIE MOLÉCULAIRE ET CELLULAIRE   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL HOUSING; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDY DESIGN; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; MOUSE; STANDARDS;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMALS; DATABASES AS TOPIC; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; MICE; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84930656503     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002151     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG, (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8: e1000412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 20613859
2. Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MF, Cuthill IC, et al. (2009) Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS One 4: e7824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007824 19956596
3. Bebarta V, Luyten D, Heard K, (2003) Emergency medicine animal research: Does use of randomization and blinding affect the results? Academic Emergency Medicine 10: 684–687. 12782533
4. Scott S, Kranz JE, Cole J, Lincecum JM, Thompson K, et al. (2008) Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis 9: 4–15. doi: 10.1080/17482960701856300 18273714
5. Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, Austin CP, Blumenstein R, et al. (2012) A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature 490: 187–191. doi: 10.1038/nature11556 23060188
6. Brown SD, Moore MW, (2012) Towards an encyclopaedia of mammalian gene function: the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Dis Model Mech 5: 289–292. doi: 10.1242/dmm.009878 22566555
7. Hooijmans CR, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, (2010) A Gold Standard Publication Checklist to Improve the Quality of Animal Studies, to Fully Integrate the Three Rs, and to Make Systematic Reviews More Feasible. Atla-Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 38: 167–182. 20507187
8. group Rw (2010) GA Passports: The key to consistent animal care. Horsham: Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA). RSPCA. 12 p.
9. Baker D, Lidster K, Sottomayor A, Amor S, (2014) Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies. PLoS Biol 12: e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756 24409096
10. Karp NA, Baker LA, Gerdin AKB, Adams NC, Ramirez-Solis R, et al. (2010) Optimising experimental design for high-throughput phenotyping in mice: a case study. Mammalian Genome 21: 467–476. doi: 10.1007/s00335-010-9279-1 20799038
11. Karp NA, Melvin D, Mott RF, Sanger Mouse Genetics P, (2012) Robust and sensitive analysis of mouse knockout phenotypes. PLoS One 7: e52410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052410 23300663
12. Kim AM, Tingen CM, Woodruff TK, (2010) Sex bias in trials and treatment must end. Nature 465: 688–689. doi: 10.1038/465688a 20535184
13. Flanagan KL, (2014) Sexual dimorphism in biomedical research: a call to analyse by sex. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 108: 385–387. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru079 24934286
14. Woodruff TK, (2014) Sex, equity, and science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 5063–5064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404203111 24715722
15. Clayton JA, Collins FS, (2014) Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature 509: 282–283. 24834516
16. Blair DR, Lyttle CS, Mortensen JM, Bearden CF, Jensen AB, et al. (2013) A nondegenerate code of deleterious variants in Mendelian loci contributes to complex disease risk. Cell 155: 70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.030 24074861
17. Smedley D, Oellrich A, Kohler S, Ruef B, Sanger Mouse Genetics P, et al. (2013) PhenoDigm: analyzing curated annotations to associate animal models with human diseases. Database (Oxford) 2013: bat025.