Matching and Reaching Depth Judgments with Real and Augmented Reality Targets

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1289-1298

  Swan, J Edward ^a   Singh, Gurjot ^b   Ellis, Stephen R ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

accommodation; augmented reality; blind reaching; Depth judgment; perceptual matching; vergence

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

ACCOMMODATION; BLIND REACHING; DEPTH JUDGMENT; PERCEPTUAL MATCHING; VERGENCES;

AUGMENTED REALITY;

EID: 84943803153     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2459895     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. B. M. Altenhoff, P. E. Napieralski, L. O. Long, J. W. Bertrand, C. C. Pagano, S. V. Babu, and T. A. Davis. Effects of calibration to visual and haptic feedback on near-field depth perception in an immersive virtual environment. In Proc. of the ACM Symp. on Applied Perception (SAP), pages 71-78, July 2012.
2. N. H. Anderson. Foundations of Information Integration Theory. Academic Press, 1981.
3. G. P. Bingham, A. Bradley, M. Bailey, and R. Vinner. Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. J. of Exp. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(6):1314-1334, 2001.
4. G. P. Bingham and C. C. Pagano. The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. J. of Exp. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1):145-168, 1998.
5. G. P. Bingham, F. Zaal, D. Robin, and J. A. Shull. Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. J. of Exp. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(4):1436-1460, 2000.
6. J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3rd edition, 2003.
7. D. Curtis, D. Mizell, P. Gruenbaum, and A. Janin. Several devils in the details: Making an AR application work in the airplane factory. In Proc. of Intern. Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR), pages 47-60, 1998.
8. J. E. Cutting and P. M. Vishton. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein and S. Rogers, editors, Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Perception of Space and Motion, volume 5, pages 69-117. Academic Press, 1995.
9. P. J. Edwards, A. P. King, C. R. Maurer Jr., D. A. de Cunha, D. J. Hawkes, D. L. G. Hill, R. P. Gaston, M. R. Fenlon, A. Jusczyzck, A. J. Strong, C. L. Chandler, and M. J. Gleeson. Design and evaluation of a system for microscope-assisted guided interventions (MAGI). IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 19(11):1082-1093, 2000.
10. S. R. Ellis and B. M. Menges. Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field. Human Factors, 40(3):415-431, 1998.
11. J. M. Foley. Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception, 6:449-460, 1977.
12. S. J. Henderson and S. Feiner. Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret. In Intern. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 135-144, 2009.
13. M. Kersten-Oertel, P. Jannin, and D. L. Collins. The state of the art of visualization in mixed reality image guided surgery. Comput. Medical Imaging and Graphics, 37(2):98-112, 2013.
14. W. S. Levine. The Control Handbook. CRC-Press, 1st edition, 1996.
15. J.W. McCandless, S. R. Ellis, and B. D. Adelstein. Localization of a timedelayed, monocular virtual object superimposed on a real environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(1):15-24, 2000.
16. M. Mon-Williams and J. R. Tresilian. Some recent studies on the extraretinal contribution to distance perception. Perception, pages 167-181, 1999.
17. M. Mon-Williams and J. R. Tresilian. Ordinal depth information from accommodation? Ergonomics, 43(3):391-404, 2000.
18. M. Mon-Williams, J. P. Wann, M. Jenkinson, and K. Rushton. Synaesthesia in the normal limb. Proc. of the Royal Society, Series B, 264:1007-1010, Jul 1997.
19. A. Naceri, R. Chellali, and T. Hoinville. Depth perception within peripersonal space using head mounted display. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20(3):254-272, 2011.
20. P. E. Napieralski, B. M. Altenhoff, J.W. Bertrand, L. O. Long, S. V. Babu, C. C. Pagano, J. Kern, and T. A. Davis. Near-field distance perception in real and virtual environments using both verbal and action responses. ACM Trans. on Applied Perception, 8(3):1-19, 2011.
21. C. C. Pagano and R. W. Isenhower. Expectation affects verbal judgments but not reaches to visually perceived egocentric distances. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2):437-442, 2008.
22. J. Paillard and M. Brouchon. Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In S. J. Freedman, editor, The Neuropsychology of Spatially Oriented Behavior, pages 37-55. Dorsey Press, 1968.
23. E. J. Pedhazur. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 2nd edition, 1982.
24. C. Prablanc, J. F. Echallier, E. Komilis, and M. Jeannerod. Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. Biological Cybernetics, 35(2):113-124, 1979.
25. J. P. Rolland, W. Gibson, and D. Ariely. Towards quantifying depth and size perception in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(3):24-49, 1995.
26. J. P. Rolland, C. Meyer, K. Arthur, and E. Rinalducci. Method of adjustment versus method of constant stimuli in the quantification of accuracy and precision of rendered depth in helmet-mounted displays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(6):610-625, 2002.
27. G. Singh. Near-Field Depth Perception in Optical See-Through Augmented Reality. PhD thesis, Mississippi State University, Aug. 2013.
28. G. Singh, J. E. Swan II, J. A. Jones, and S. R. Ellis. Depth judgment measures and occluding surfaces in near-field augmented reality. In ACM Symp. on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV), pages 149-156, 2010.
29. G. Singh, J. E. Swan II, J. A. Jones, and S. R. Ellis. Depth judgment tasks and environments in near-field augmented reality. In Proc. of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pages 241-242, March 2011.
30. G. Singh, J. E. Swan II, J. A. Jones, and S. R. Ellis. Depth judgments by reaching and matching in near-field augmented reality. In Proc. of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pages 165-166, March 2012.
31. R. J. van Beers, A. C. Sittig, and J. J. Denier van der Gon. How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Experimental Brain Research, 111(2):253-61, 1996.
32. J. P. Wann. The integrity of visual-proprioceptive mapping in cerebral palsy. Neuropsychologia, 29:1095-1106, 1991.
33. J. P. Wann, S. Rushton, and M. Mon-Williams. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35(19):2731-2736, 1995.