Method of adjustments versus method of constant stimuli in the quantification of accuracy and precision of rendered depth in head-mounted displays

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 610-625

  Rolland, J P ^a   Meyer, C ^a   Arthur, K ^b   Rinalducci, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAYS;

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; GRAPHIC METHODS; IMAGE ANALYSIS;

HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS;

EID: 0036957297     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105474602321050730     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Biocca, F., & Rolland J. P. (1998). Virtual eyes can rearrange your body: Adaptation to virtual eye location in see-thru head-mounted displays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 262-277.
2. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein and S. Rogers (Eds.), The perception of space and motion, (pp. 69-117). San Diego: Academic Press.
3. Ellis, S. R., & Bucher, U. J. (1994). Distance perception of stereoscopically presented virtual objects superimposed by a head mounted see through display. Proceedings, 38th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1300-1305.
4. Ellis, Stephen R, Bucher, Urs J., & Menges, Brian. (1995). The relationship of binocular convergence and errors in judged distance to virtual objects. Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control '95, 297-301.
5. Ellis, S. R., & Menges, B. M. (1997). Judged distance to virtual objects in the near visual field. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 452-460.
6. rd ed. New York: Holt, Reinhert & Winston.
7. Gescheider, G. A. (1976). Psychophysics: Method and theory. New York: Wiley.
8. nd ed. New York. McGraw-Hill.
9. Howard, H. J. (1919). A test for the judgment of distance. American Journal of ophthalmology, 2, 656-675.
10. Hua, H., Girardot, A., Gao, C., & Rolland, J. P. (2000). Engineering of head-mounted projective displays. Applied Optics, 39(22), 3814-3824.
11. Lit, A., & Finn, J. P. (1976). Variablity of depth-discrimination thresholds as a function of observation distance. J. Opt. Soc. of Am. A., 66(7), 740-742.
12. Marran, L., & Schor, C. (1997). Multiaccommodative stimuli in VR systems: Problems and solutions. Human Factors, 37, 382-388.
13. Palmer, E., & Cronn, F. W. (1973). Touchdown performance with computer graphics night visual attachment. Proceedings of the AIAA Visual and Motion Simulation Conference, 1-6.
14. Randle, R. J., Roscoe, S. N., & Petitt, J. (1980). Effects of accommodation and magnification on aimpoint estimation in a simulated landing task (Tech Paper NASA-TP-1635). Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
15. Reading, R. W. (1983). Binocular vision: Foundations and applications. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
16. Robinett, W., & Rolland, J. P. (1992). A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 45-62.
17. Rolland, J. P., Ariely, D. & Gibson, W. (1995). Towards quantifying depth and size perception in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(1), 24-49.
18. Rolland, J. P., & Fuchs, H. (2000). Optical versus video seethrough head-mounted displays in medical visualization. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(3), 287-309.
19. Rolland, J. P., & Hopkins, T. (1993). A method of computational correction for optical distortion in head-mounted displays (Tech. Rep. TR-93-045). Dept. of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
20. Rolland, J. P., Krueger, M. & Goon, A. (2000). Multi-focal planes in head-mounted displays. Applied Optics, 39(19), 3209-3215.
21. Roscoe, S. N., Olzak, L. A., & Randle, R. J. (1976). Ground-referenced visual orientation with imaging displays: Monocular versus binocular accommodation and judgments of relative size. Proc. of the AGARD Conf. on Visual Presentation of Cockpit Information Including Special Devices for Particular Conditions of Flying, A5.1-A5.9.
22. State, A., Livingston, M. A., Garrett, W. F., Hirota, G., Whitton, M. C., Pisano, E. D., & Fuchs, H. (1996). Technologies for augmented reality systems: Realizing ultrasound-guided needle biopsies. Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, 439-446.
23. Surdick, R. T., Davis, E. T., King, R. A., Corso, G. M., Shapiro, A., Hodges, L., & Elliot, K. (1994). Relevant cues for the visual perception of depth: Is where you see it where it is? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 2, 1305-1309.
24. Sutherland, I. (1968). A head-mounted three-dimensional display. Fall Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 33, 757-764.
25. Utsumi, A., Milgram, P., Takemura, H., & Kishino, F. (1995). Effects of fuzziness in perception of stereoscopically presented virtual object location. Proc. of the SPIE: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 337-344.
26. Wann, J., Rushton, S., & Mon-Williams, M. (1995). Natural problems in the perception of virtual environments. Vision Research, 35, 2731-2736.
27. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371-394.