Expectation affects verbal judgments but not reaches to visually perceived egocentric distances

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 437-442

  Pagano, Christopher C ^a   Isenhower, Robert W ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; SOCIAL DISTANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; SOCIAL DISTANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 48049089017     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.437     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AGLIOTI, S., DESOUSA, J. F. X., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). Size contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. BRIDGEMAN, B. (1991). Complementary cognitive and motor image processing. In G. Obrecht & L. W. Stark (Eds.), Presbyopia research: From molecular biology to visual adaptation (pp. 189-198). New York: Plenum.
3. BRIDGEMAN, B., GEMMER, A., FORSMAN, T., & HUEMER, V. (2000). Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Research, 40, 3539-3552.
4. BRIDGEMAN, B., KIRCH, M., & SPERLING, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
5. CAREY, D. P., DUKERMAN, H. C., & MILNER, A. D. (1998). Perception and action in depth. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 438-453.
6. DASSONVILLE, P., BRIDGEMAN, B., BALA, K. P., THEIM, P., & SAMPANES, A. (2004). The induced Roelofs effect: Two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame? Vision Research, 44, 603-611.
7. FOLEY, J. M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception, 6, 449-460.
8. FOLEY, J. M. (1985). Binocular distance perception: Egocentric distance tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 133-149.
9. FRANZ, V. H., FAHLE, M., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & GEGENFURTNER, K. R. (2001). Effects of visual illusions on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 1124-1144.
10. GLOVER, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 27, 3-78.
11. GOGEL, W. C. (1968). The measurement of perceived size and distance. In W. D. Neff (Ed.), Contributions to sensory physiology (Vol. 3, pp. 125-148). New York: Academic Press.
12. GOGEL, W. C. (1981). The role of suggested size in distance responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 149-155.
13. GOGEL, W. C. (1993). The analysis of perceived space. In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Foundations of perceptual theory (pp. 113-182). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. GOGEL, W. C., & DA SILVA, J. A. (1987). A two-process theory of the response to size and distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 220-238.
15. HEFT, H. (1993). A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: Distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Psychology, 5, 255-271.
16. HU, Y., & GOODALE, M. A. (2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856-868.
17. JACKSON, S. R., & SHAW, A. (2000). The Ponzo illusion affects grip-force but not grip-aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 418-423.
18. LI, W., & MATIN, L. (2005). Two wrongs make a right: Linear increase of accuracy of visually-guided manual pointing, reaching, and height matching with increase in hand-to-body distance. Vision Research, 45, 533-550.
19. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. MON-WILLIAMS, M., & TRESILIAN, J. R. (1999). The size-distance paradox is a cognitive phenomenon. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 578-582.
21. PAGANO, C. C., & BINGHAM, G. P. (1998). Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1037-1051.
22. PAGANO, C. C., GRUTZMACHER, R. P., & JENKINS, J. C. (2001). Comparing verbal and reaching responses to visually perceived egocentric distances. Ecological Psychology, 13, 197-226.
23. PAVANI, F., BOSCAGLI, I., BENVENUTI, F., RABUFFETTI, M., & FARNE, A. (1999). Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Experimental Brain Research, 127, 95-101.
24. PERENIN, M. T., & ROSSETTI, Y. (1996). Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopic field. NeuroReport, 7, 793-797.
25. PHILBECK, J. W., & LOOMIS, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 72-85.
26. PREDEBON, J., & WOOLLEY, J. S. (1994). The familiar-size cue to depth under reduced-cue viewing conditions. Perception, 23, 1301-1312.
27. PROFFITT, D. R., Bhalla, M., GOSSWEILER, R., & MIDGETT, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428.
28. ROSSETTI, Y., PISELLA, L., & VIGHETTO, A. (2003). Optic ataxia revisited: Visually guided action versus immediate visiomotor control. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 171-179.
29. SMEETS, J. B. J., & BRENNER, E. (1995). Perception and action are based on the same visual information: Distinction between position and velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 19-31.
30. VISHTON, P. M., REA, J. G., CUTTING, J. E., & NUÑEZ, L. N. (1999). Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: Relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1659-1672.
31. WANG, R. F. (2004). Action, verbal response and spatial reasoning. Cognition, 94, 185-192.
32. WESTWOOD, D. A., & GOODALE, M. A. (2003). Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision, 16, 243-254.
33. WILSON, A. D., BINGHAM, G. P., & CRAIG, J. C. (2003). Proprioceptive perception of phase variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1179-1190.