Adding semantics to data-driven paraphrasing

ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2015, Pages 1512-1522

  Pavlick, Ellie ^a   Bos, Johan ^b   Nissim, Malvina ^b   Beller, Charley ^c   Durme, Benjamin Van ^d   Callison Burch, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^d IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

DATA DRIVEN; HIGH-ACCURACY; INFERENCE RULES; SEMANTIC ENTAILMENT; SEMANTIC TAXONOMIES; WORDNET;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84943798219     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-1146     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Ion Androutsopoulos and Prodromos Malakasiotis. 2010. A survey of paraphrasing and textual entailment methods. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 38.
2. Colin Bannard and Chris Callison-Burch. 2005. Paraphrasing with bilingual parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 597-604.
3. Regina Barzilay. 2003. Information fusion for multidocument summarization: paraphrasing and generation. Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University.
4. Islam Beltagy, Stephen Roller, Gemma Boleda, Katrin Erk, and Raymond J Mooney. 2014. UTexas: Natural language semantics using distributional semantics and probabilistic logic. SemEval 2014, page 796.
5. Jonathan Berant, Ido Dagan, and Jacob Goldberger. 2011. Global learning of typed entailment rules. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies -Volume 1, HLT 11, pages 610-619.
6. Rahul Bhagat and Eduard Hovy. 2013. What is a paraphrase? Computational Linguistics, 39.
7. Rahul Bhagat, Patrick Pantel, Eduard H Hovy, and Marina Rey. 2007. Ledir: An unsupervised algorithm for learning directionality of inference rules. In EMNLP-CoNLL, pages 161-170. Citeseer.
8. Johannes Bjerva, Johan Bos, Rob van der Goot, and Malvina Nissim. 2014. The meaning factory: Formal semantics for recognizing textual entailment and determining semantic similarity. SemEval 2014, page 642.
9. Johan Bos. 2008. Wide-coverage semantic analysis with boxer. In Johan Bos and Rodolfo Delmonte, editors, Semantics in Text Processing. STEP 2008 Conference Proceedings, Research in Computational Semantics, pages 277-286. College Publications.
10. Christopher John Brockett, Stanley Kok, and Dengyong Zhou. 2013. Locating paraphrases through utilization of a multipartite graph, July 9. US Patent 8, 484, 016.
11. Chris Callison-Burch. 2007. Paraphrasing and Translation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
12. Timothy Chklovski and Patrick Pantel. 2004. VerbOcean: Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. In EMNLP, volume 2004, pages 33-40.
13. Peter Clark, William R. Murray, John Thompson, Phil Harrison, Jerry Hobbs, and Christiane Fellbaum. 2007. On the role of lexical and world knowledge in rte3. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, RTE 07, pages 54-59.
14. Peter Clark, Myroslava O Dzikovska, Rodney D Nielsen, Chris Brew, Claudia Leacock, Danilo Giampiccolo, Luisa Bentivogli, Ido Dagan, and Hoa T Dang. 2013. Semeval-2013 task 7: The joint student response analysis and 8th recognizing textual entailment challenge.
15. Daoud Clarke. 2009. Context-Theoretic semantics for natural language: an overview. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, pages 112-119.
16. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2006. The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge. In Machine Learning Challenges. Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognising Tectual Entailment, pages 177-190. Springer.
17. Bill Dolan, Chris Quirk, and Chris Brockett. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics, page 350.
18. Juri Ganitkevitch and Chris Callison-Burch. 2014. The multilingual paraphrase database. In The 9th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, May. European Language Resources Association.
19. Juri Ganitkevitch, Benjamin Van Durme, and Chris Callison-Burch. 2013. PPDB: The paraphrase database. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 758-764, Atlanta, Georgia, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Danilo Giampiccolo, Bernardo Magnini, Ido Dagan, and Bill Dolan. 2007. The third PASCAL recognizing textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL workshop on textual entailment and paraphrasing, pages 1-9.
21. Chikara Hashimoto, Kentaro Torisawa, Kow Kuroda, Stijn De Saeger, Masaki Murata, and Junichi Kazama. 2009. Large-scale verb entailment acquisition from the web. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 3-Volume 3, pages 1172-1181. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Marti A. Hearst. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics -Volume 2, COLING 92, pages 539-545.
23. Aaron N Kaplan and Lenhart K Schubert. 2001. Measuring and improving the quality of world knowledge extracted from wordnet. University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
24. Lili Kotlerman, Ido Dagan, Idan Szpektor, and Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet. 2010. Directional distributional similarity for lexical inference. Natural Language Engineering, 16(4):359-389.
25. Alice Lai and Julia Hockenmaier. 2014. Illinois-LH: A denotational and distributional approach to semantics. SemEval 2014, page 329.
26. J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, pages 159-174.
27. Dekang Lin and Patrick Pantel. 2001. DIRT -Discovery of Inference Rules from Text. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 323-328. ACM.
28. Dekang Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2, pages 768-774.
29. Bill MacCartney and Christopher D. Manning. 2007. Natural logic for textual inference. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, RTE 07, pages 193-200.
30. Bill MacCartney. 2009. Natural language inference. Ph.D. Thesis, Citeseer.
31. Nitin Madnani and Bonnie J. Dorr. 2010. Generating phrasal and sentential paraphrases: A survey of datadriven methods. Computational Linguistics, 36.
32. Marco Marelli, Luisa Bentivogli, Marco Baroni, Raffaella Bernardi, Stefano Menini, and Roberto Zamparelli. 2014. Semeval-2014 task 1: Evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models on full sentences through semantic relatedness and textual entailment. SemEval-2014.
33. Courtney Napoles, Matthew Gormley, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2012. Annotated gigaword. In Proceedings of the JointWorkshop on Automatic Knowledge Base Construction and Web-scale Knowledge Extraction, pages 95-100.
34. Maria Pontiki, Haris Papageorgiou, Dimitrios Galanis, Ion Androutsopoulos, John Pavlopoulos, and Suresh Manandhar. 2014. Semeval-2014 task 4: Aspect based sentiment analysis. Proceedings of SemEval, Dublin, Ireland.
35. Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y Ng. 2004. Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery. In NIPS, volume 17, pages 1297-1304.
36. Rion Snow, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2006. Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pages 801-808.
37. Idan Szpektor and Ido Dagan. 2008. Learning entailment rules for unary templates. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics -Volume 1, COLING 08, pages 849-856.
38. Idan Szpektor, Hristo Tanev, Dr Dagan, Bonaventura Coppola, et al. 2004. Scaling web-based acquisition of entailment relations.
39. Julie Weeds, David Weir, and Diana McCarthy. 2004. Characterising measures of lexical distributional similarity. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 04.
40. Wei Xu, Alan Ritter, Chris Callison-Burch, William B. Dolan, and Yangfeng Ji. 2014. Extracting lexically divergent paraphrases from Twitter. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2.
41. Jiang Zhao, Tian Tian Zhu, and Man Lan. 2014. Ecnu: One stone two birds: Ensemble of heterogenous measures for semantic relatedness and textual entailment. SemEval 2014, page 271.