ConStrains identifies microbial strains in metagenomic datasets

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1045-1052

  Luo, Chengwei ^a,b   Knight, Rob ^c,d,i   Siljander, Heli ^e   Knip, Mikael ^e,f,g   Xavier, Ramnik J ^a,b,h,j   Gevers, Dirk ^a,i  

^a BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^f FOLKHÄLSAN RESEARCH CENTER   (Finland)

^g TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^h Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Belgium)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; BIOLOGY;

BACTERIAL STRAINS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIAL STRAIN; SINGLE-NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS; STRAIN IDENTIFICATION; STRAIN LEVELS;

MICROORGANISMS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; GENOTYPE; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIUM; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MICROFLORA; PROCEDURES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ALGORITHMS; BACTERIA; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DATABASES, GENETIC; DATASETS AS TOPIC; GENOME, BACTERIAL; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOTA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84943606160     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3319     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nat. Methods 9, 811-814 (2012).
2. Sunagawa, S. et al. Metagenomic species profiling using universal phylogenetic marker genes. Nat. Methods 10, 1196-1199 (2013).
3. Darling, A.E. et al. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ 2, e243 (2014).
4. Sharon, I. et al. Time series community genomics analysis reveals rapid shifts in bacterial species, strains, and phage during infant gut colonization. Genome Res. 23, 111-120 (2013).
5. Nielsen, H.B. et al. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 822-828 (2014).
6. Imelfort, M. et al. GroopM: an automated tool for the recovery of population genomes from related metagenomes. PeerJ 2, e603 (2014).
7. Luo, C. et al. Genome sequencing of environmental Escherichia coli expands understanding of the ecology and speciation of the model bacterial species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7200-7205 (2011).
8. Kashtan, N. et al. Single-cell genomics reveals hundreds of coexisting subpopulations in wild Prochlorococcus. Science 344, 416-420 (2014).
9. Faith, J.J. et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science 341, 1237439 (2013).
10. Maslunka, C., Gifford, B., Tucci, J., Gurtler, V. and Seviour, R.J. Insertions or deletions (Indels) in the rrn 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) compromise the typing and identification of strains within the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii (Acb) complex and closely related members. PLoS ONE 9, e105390 (2014).
11. Han, D. et al. Population structure of clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus from 17 coastal countries, determined through multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e107371 (2014).
12. Schloissnig, S. et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493, 45-50 (2013).
13. Beitel, C.W. et al. Strain- and plasmid-level deconvolution of a synthetic metagenome by sequencing proximity ligation products. PeerJ 2, e415 (2014).
14. Greenblum, S., Carr, R. and Borenstein, E. Extensive strain-level copy-number variation across human gut microbiome species. Cell 160, 583-594 (2015).
15. Karlsson, E. et al. Eight new genomes and synthetic controls increase the accessibility of rapid melt-MAMA SNP typing of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS ONE 9, e85417 (2014).
16. Hong, C. et al. PathoScope 2.0: a complete computational framework for strain identification in environmental or clinical sequencing samples. Microbiome 2, 33 (2014).
17. Ahn, T.H., Chai, J. and Pan, C. Sigma: strain-level inference of genomes from metagenomic analysis for biosurveillance. Bioinformatics 31, 170-177 (2015).
18. Miller, J.R., Koren, S. and Sutton, G. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics 95, 315-327 (2010).
19. Luo, C., Tsementzi, D., Kyrpides, N.C. and Konstantinidis, K.T. Individual genome assembly from complex community short-read metagenomic datasets. ISME J. 6, 898-901 (2012).
20. Nijkamp, J.F., Pop, M., Reinders, M.J. and de Ridder, D. Exploring variation-aware contig graphs for (comparative) metagenomics using MaryGold. Bioinformatics 29, 2826-2834 (2013).
21. Lasken, R.S. and McLean, J.S. Recent advances in genomic DNA sequencing of microbial species from single cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 577-584 (2014).
22. Ivanova, N. et al. Genome sequence of Bacillus cereus and comparative analysis with Bacillus anthracis. Nature 423, 87-91 (2003).
23. Segata, N., Bornigen, D., Morgan, X.C. and Huttenhower, C. PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2304 (2013).
24. Langmead, B. and Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
25. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
26. Eren, A.M. et al. Oligotyping: Differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1111-1119 (2013).
27. Eren, A.M. et al. Minimum entropy decomposition: unsupervised oligotyping for sensitive partitioning of high-throughput marker gene sequences. ISME J. 9, 968-979 (2014).
28. Nandi, T. et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei sequencing identifies genomic clades with distinct recombination, accessory, and epigenetic profiles. Genome Res. 25, 129-141 (2015).
29. David, L.A. et al. Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales. Genome Biol. 15, R89 (2014).
30. Lieberman, T.D. et al. Genetic variation of a bacterial pathogen within individuals with cystic fibrosis provides a record of selective pressures. Nat. Genet. 46, 82-87 (2014).
31. Sokol, H. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16731-16736 (2008).
32. Crost, E.H. et al. Utilisation of mucin glycans by the human gut symbiont Ruminococcus gnavus is strain-dependent. PLoS ONE 8, e76341 (2013).
33. Di Gioia, D., Aloisio, I., Mazzola, G. and Biavati, B. Bifidobacteria: their impact on gut microbiota composition and their applications as probiotics in infants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 563-577 (2014).
34. Lee, S.M. et al. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nature 501, 426-429 (2013).
35. Schell, M.A. et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14422-14427 (2002).
36. Sela, D.A. et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18964-18969 (2008).