Sensitivity of real-data simulations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell and associated tornadoes to multimoment microphysics. Part I: Storm- and tornado-scale numerical forecasts

Monthly Weather Review

Volumn 143, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 2241-2265

  Dawson, Daniel T ^a   Xue, Ming ^a,b   Milbrandt, Jason A ^c   Shapiro, Alan ^b  

^a Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cloud microphysics; Cloud resolving models; Cold pools; Numerical weather prediction forecasting; Supercells; Tornadoes

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYERS; FORECASTING; STORMS; THERMODYNAMICS; TORNADOES;

CLOUD MICROPHYSICS; CLOUD RESOLVING MODEL; COLD POOL; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION/FORECASTING; SUPER CELL;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLIMATE MODELING; CLOUD MICROPHYSICS; COLD POOL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROMETEOROLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPERCELL; TORNADO; WEATHER FORECASTING;

OKLAHOMA [OKLAHOMA (STT)]; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84943424715     PISSN: 00270644     EISSN: 15200493     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00279.1     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Arakawa, A., and V. R. Lamb, 1977: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. Methods in Computational Physics, J. Chang, Ed., Vol. 17, Academic Press, 174-264.
2. Beck, J., and C. Weiss, 2013: An assessment of low-level baroclinity and vorticity within a simulated supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 649-669, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00115.1.
3. Bolton, D., 1980: The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev., 108, 1046-1053, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1046:TCOEPT>2.0.CO;2.
4. Brewster, K., M. Hu, M. Xue, and J. Gao, 2005: Efficient assimilation of radar data at high resolution for short-range numerical weather prediction. Proc. Int. Symp. on Nowcasting and Very Short Range Forecasting, Toulouse, France, WWRP, 3.06.
5. Brock, F. V., K. C. Crawford, R. L. Elliott, G. W. Cuperus, S. J. Stadler, H. L. Johnson, and M. D. Eilts, 1995: The Oklahoma Mesonet: A technical overview. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 5-19, doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0005:TOMATO>2.0.CO;2.
6. Bunkers, M. J., and J. W. Zeitler, 2000: On the nature of highly deviant supercell motion. 20th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 236-239.
7. 2 with application to climate studies. J. Climate, 3, 209-217, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1990)003<0209:PFTAOS>2.0.CO;2.
8. Chou, M.-D., 1992: A solar radiation model for use in climate studies. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 762-772, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<0762:ASRMFU>2.0.CO;2.
9. Chou, M.-D., and M. J. Suarez, 1994: An efficient thermal infrared radiation parameterization for use in general circulation models. NASA Tech. Memo. 104606, 85 pp.
10. Cohen, C., and E. W. McCaul, 2006: The sensitivity of simulated convective storms to variations in prescribed single-moment microphysics parameters that describe particle distributions, sizes, and numbers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2547-2565, doi:10.1175/MWR3195.1.
11. Dawson, D. T., II, M. Xue, J. A. Milbrandt, andM. K. Yau, 2010: Comparison of evaporation and cold pool development between single-moment and multimoment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized simulations of tornadic thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1152-1171, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2956.1.
12. Ferrier, B. S., W.-K. Tao, and J. Simpson, 1995: A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part II: Simulations of convective storms in different large-scale environments and comparisons with other bulk parameterizations. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1001-1033, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<1001:ADMMPF>2.0.CO;2.
13. Frame, J., and P. Markowski, 2010: Numerical simulations of radiative cooling beneath the anvils of supercell thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 3024-3047, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3177.1.
14. Frame, J., and P. Markowski, 2013: Dynamical influences of anvil shading on simulated supercell thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2802-2820, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00146.1.
15. Fujita, T. T., 1971: A proposed characterization of tornadoes and hurricanes by area and intensity. SMRP Res. Paper 91, Dept. of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 42 pp.
16. Gao, J.-D., M. Xue, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2004: A three-dimensional variational data analysis method with recursive filter for Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 457-469, doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0457:ATVDAM>2.0.CO;2.
17. Gilmore, M. S., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2004: Precipitation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a simple microphysics scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2610-2627, doi:10.1175/MWR2810.1.
18. Hu, M., M. Xue, and K. Brewster, 2006: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of Fort Worth tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud analysis and its impact. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 675-698, doi:10.1175/MWR3092.1.
19. Hu, M., M. Xue, J. Gao, and K. Brewster, 2006: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of Fort Worth tornadic thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of radial velocity analysis via 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 699-721, doi:10.1175/MWR3093.1.
20. Jung, Y., M. Xue, and G. Zhang, 2010: Simulations of polarimetric radar signatures of a supercell storm using a two-moment bulk microphysics scheme. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 146-163, doi:10.1175/2009JAMC2178.1.
21. Jung, Y., M. Xue, and M. Tong, 2012: Ensemble Kalman filter analyses of the 29-30 May 2004 Oklahoma tornadic thunderstorm using one-and two-moment bulk microphysics schemes, with verification against polarimetric radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1457-1475, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00032.1.
22. Kogan, Y. L., and A. Belochitski, 2012: Parameterization of cloud microphysics based on full integral moments. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2229-2242, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0268.1.
23. Kosiba, K., J. Wurman, Y. Richardson, P. Markowski, P. Robinson, and J. Marquis, 2013: Genesis of the Goshen County, Wyoming, tornado on 5 June 2009 during VORTEX2. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 1157-1181, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00056.1.
24. Kumjian, M. R., and A. V. Ryzhkov, 2012: The impact of size sorting on the polarimetric radar variables. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 2042-2060, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0125.1.
25. Lee, B. D., C. A. Finley, and C. D. Karstens, 2012: The Bowdle, South Dakota, cyclic tornadic supercell of 22 May 2010: Surface analysis of rear-flank downdraft evolution and multiple internal surges. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 3419-3441, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00351.1.
26. Lerach, D. G., and W. R. Cotton, 2012: Comparing aerosol and low-level moisture influences on supercell tornadogenesis: Three-dimensional idealized simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 969-987, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-043.1.
27. Lerach, D. G., B. J. Gaudet, and W. R. Cotton, 2008: Idealized simulations of aerosol influences on tornadogenesis. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L23806, doi:10.1029/2008GL035617.
28. Leslie, L. M., and R. K. Smith, 1978: The effect of vertical stability on tornadogenesis. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1281-1288, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<1281:TEOVSO>2.0.CO;2.
29. Lin, Y.-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065-1092, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1065:BPOTSF>2.0.CO;2.
30. Markowski, P. M., 2002: Mobile mesonet observations on 3 May 1999. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 430-444, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0430:MMOOM>2.0.CO;2.
31. Markowski, P. M., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2002: Direct surface thermodynamic observations within the rear-flank downdrafts of nontornadic and tornadic supercells. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1692-1721, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1692:DSTOWT>2.0.CO;2.
32. Markowski, P. M., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2003: Tornadogenesis resulting from the transport of circulation by a downdraft: Idealized numerical simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 795-823, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<0795:TRFTTO>2.0.CO;2.
33. Markowski, P. M., Y. Richardson, E. Rasmussen, J. Straka, R. Davies-Jones, and R. J. Trapp, 2008: Vortex lines within low-level mesocyclones obtained from pseudo-dual-Doppler radar observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 3513-3535, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2315.1.
34. Markowski, P. M., M. Majcen, Y. Richardson, J. Marquis, and J. Wurman, 2011: Characteristics of the wind field in a trio of nontornadic low-level mesocyclones observed by the Doppler On Wheels radars. Electron. J. Severe Storms Meteor., 6 (3). [Available online at http://www.ejssm.org/ojs/index.php/ejssm/article/viewArticle/75.].
35. Markowski, P. M., and et al., 2012: The pretornadic phase of the Goshen County, Wyoming, supercell of 5 June 2009 intercepted by VORTEX2. Part I: Evolution of kinematic and surface thermodynamic fields. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2887-2915, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00336.1.
36. Marquis, J., Y. Richardson, J. Wurman, and P. Markowski, 2008: Single-and dual-Doppler analysis of a tornadic vortex and surrounding storm-scale flow in the Crowell, Texas, supercell of 30 April 2000. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 5017-5043, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2442.1.
37. Marquis, J., Y. Richardson, P. Markowski, D. Dowell, J. Wurman, K. Kosiba, P. Robinson, and G. Romine, 2014: An investigation of the Goshen County, Wyoming, tornadic supercell of 5 June 2009 using EnKF assimilation of mobile mesonet and radar observations collected during VORTEX2. Part I: Experiment design and verification of the EnKF analyses. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 530-554, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-00007.1.
38. Marshall, J. S., and W. M. Palmer, 1948: The distribution of raindrops with size. J. Meteor., 5, 165-166, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1948)005<0165:TDORWS>2.0.CO;2.
39. Mashiko, W., H. Niino, and K. Teruyuki, 2009: Numerical simulations of tornadogenesis in an outer-rainband minisupercell of Typhoon Shanshan on 17 September 2006. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 4238-4260, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2959.1.
40. McCumber, M., W.-K. Tao, and J. Simpson, 1991: Comparison of ice-phase microphysical parameterization schemes using numerical simulations of tropical convection. J. Appl. Meteor., 30, 985-1004, doi:10.1175/1520-0450-30.7.985.
41. Mesinger, F., and et al., 2006: North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 343-360, doi:10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343.
42. Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3051-3064, doi:10.1175/JAS3534.1.
43. Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2005: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3065-3081, doi:10.1175/JAS3535.1.
44. Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2006: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part III: Control simulation of a hailstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3114-3136, doi:10.1175/JAS3816.1.
45. Milbrandt, J. A., and M. K. Yau, 2006: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part IV: Sensitivity experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 3137-3159, doi:10.1175/JAS3817.1.
46. Milbrandt, J. A., and R. McTaggart-Cowan, 2010: Sedimentation-induced errors in bulk microphysics schemes. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3931-3948, doi:10.1175/2010JAS3541.1.
47. Morrison, H., and J. Milbrandt, 2011: Comparison of two-moment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized supercell thunderstorm simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1103-1130, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3433.1.
48. Morrison, H., G. Thompson, and V. Tatarskii, 2009: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one-and two-moment schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991-1007, doi:10.1175/2008MWR2556.1.
49. Morrison, H., S. A. Tessendorf, K. Ikeda, and G. Thompson, 2012: Sensitivity of a simulated midlatitude squall line to parameterization of raindrop breakup. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2437-2460, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00283.1.
50. Roebber, P. J., D. M. Schultz, and R. Romero, 2002: Synoptic regulation of the 3 May 1999 tornado outbreak. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 399-429, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0399:SROTMT>2.0.CO;2.
51. Schenkman, A. D., M. Xue, A. Shapiro, K. Brewster, and J. Gao, 2011: Impact of CASA radar and Oklahoma Mesonet data assimilation on the analysis and prediction of tornadic mesovortices in an MCS. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3422-3445, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-10-05051.1.
52. Schenkman, A. D., M. Xue, and A. Shapiro, 2012: Tornadogenesis in a simulated mesovortex within a mesoscale convective system. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3372-3390, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-038.1.
53. Schenkman, A. D., M. Xue, and M. Hu, 2014: Tornadogenesis in a high-resolution simulation of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City supercell. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 130-154, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-073.1.
54. Shabbott, C. J., and P. M. Markowski, 2006: Surface in situ observations within the outflow of forward-flank downdrafts of supercell thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1422-1441, doi:10.1175/MWR3131.1.
55. Skinner, P. S., C. C. Weiss, M. M. French, H. B. Bluestein, P. M. Markowski, and Y. P. Richardson, 2014: VORTEX2 observations of a low-level mesocyclone with multiple internal rearflank downdraft momentum surges in the 18 May 2010 Dumas, Texas, supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 2935-2960, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-00240.1.
56. Smith, P. L., Jr., C. G. Myers, and H. D. Orville, 1975: Radar reflectivity factor calculations in numerical cloud models using bulk parameterization of precipitation processes. J. Appl. Meteor., 14, 1156-1165, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1975)014<1156:RRFCIN>2.0.CO;2.
57. Snook, N., and M. Xue, 2008: Effects of microphysical drop size distribution on tornadogenesis in supercell thunderstorms. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L24803, doi:10.1029/2008GL035866.
58. Speheger, D. A., C. A. Doswell III, and G. J. Stumpf, 2002: The tornadoes of 3 May 1999: Event verification in central Oklahoma and related issues. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 362-381, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0362:TTOMEV>2.0.CO;2.
59. Sun, W.-Y., and C.-Z. Chang, 1986: Diffusion model for a convective layer. Part I: Numerical simulation of convective boundary layer. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25, 1445-1453, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<1445:DMFACL>2.0.CO;2.
60. Tao, W.-K., and J. Simpson, 1993: Goddard cumulus ensemble model. Part I: Model description. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 4, 35-72.
61. Testud, J., S. Oury, R. A. Black, P. Amayenc, and X. Dou, 2001: The concept of "normalized" distribution to describe raindrop spectra: A tool for cloud physics and cloud remote sensing. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 1118-1140, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1118:TCONDT>2.0.CO;2.
62. Trapp, R. J., 1999: Observations of nontornadic low-level mesocyclones and attendant tornadogenesis failure during VORTEX. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 1693-1705, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1693:OONLLM>2.0.CO;2.
63. Trapp, R. J., G. J. Stumpf, and K. L. Manross, 2005: A reassessment of the percentage of tornadic mesocyclones. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 680-687, doi:10.1175/WAF864.1.
64. Ulbrich, C. W., 1983: Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1764-1775, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1764:NVITAF>2.0.CO;2.
65. van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596-1609, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<1596:TIOHSO>2.0.CO;2.
66. Van Weverberg, K., 2013: Impact of environmental instability on convective precipitation uncertainty associated with the nature of the rimed ice species in a bulk microphysics scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2841-2849, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-00036.1.
67. Van Weverberg, K., N. P. M. van Lipzig, and L. Delobbe, 2011: The impact of size distribution assumptions in a bulk one-moment microphysics scheme on simulated surface precipitation and storm dynamics during a low-topped supercell case in Belgium. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1131-1147, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3481.1.
68. Van Weverberg, K., A.M. Vogelmann, H. Morrison, and J. A. Milbrandt, 2012: Sensitivity of idealized squall-line simulations to the level of complexity used in two-moment bulk microphysics schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1883-1907, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00120.1.
69. Van Weverberg, K., and et al., 2013: The role of cloud microphysics parameterization in the simulation of mesoscale convective system clouds and precipitation in the tropical western Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1104-1128, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-0104.1.
70. Wainwright, C. E., D. T. Dawson, M. Xue, and G. Zhang, 2014: Diagnosing the intercept parameters of the exponential drop size distributions in a single-moment microphysics scheme and impact on supercell storm simulations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 2072-2090, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0251.1.
71. WSEC, 2006:Arecommendation for an enhanced Fujita scale (EFscale). Wind Science and Engineering Center, Texas Tech University, 95 pp. [Available online at http://www.depts.ttu.edu/nwi/Pubs/FScale/EFScale.pdf.].
72. Wurman, J., Y. Richardson, C. Alexander, S. Weygandt, and P. F. Zhang, 2007: Dual-Doppler and single-Doppler analysis of a tornadic storm undergoing mergers and repeated tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 736-758, doi:10.1175/MWR3276.1.
73. Wurman, J., K. Kosiba, P. Markowski, Y. Richardson, D. Dowell, and P. Robinson, 2010: Finescale single-and dual-Doppler analysis of tornado intensification, maintenance, and dissipation in the Orleans, Nebraska, supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 4439-4455, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3330.1.
74. Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, and V. Wong, 2000: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)-A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part I: Model dynamics and verification. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 75, 161-193, doi:10.1007/s007030070003.
75. Xue, M., and et al., 2001: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)-A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 76, 143-166, doi:10.1007/s007030170027.
76. Xue, M., D.-H. Wang, J.-D. Gao, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2003: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 139-170, doi:10.1007/s00703-001-0595-6.
77. Xue, M., M. Hu, and A. D. Schenkman, 2014: Numerical prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell and embedded tornado using ARPS with the assimilation of WSR-88D data. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 39-62, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-13-00029.1.
78. Zeitler, J. W., and M. J. Bunkers, 2005: Operational forecasting of supercell motion: Review and case studies using multiple datasets. Natl. Wea. Dig., 29, 81-97.
79. Zhang, J., F. Carr, and K. Brewster, 1998: ADAS cloud analysis. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 185-188.