Comparing aerosol and low-level moisture influences on supercell tornadogenesis: Three-dimensional idealized simulations

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 969-987

  Lerach, David G ^a   Cotton, William R ^a  

^a Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerosols; Supercells; Tornadogenesis

Indexed keywords

AEROSOL EFFECT; CLOUD CONDENSATION NUCLEI; COLD POOL; CONVECTIVE AVAILABLE POTENTIAL ENERGIES; EVAPORATIVE COOLING; HORIZONTAL GRID SPACING; MODELING SYSTEMS; MOISTURE INFLUENCE; REAR-FLANK; SUPER CELL; SUPERCELL STORMS; SUPERCELLS; TORNADO-LIKE VORTEX; TORNADOGENESIS; WATER VAPOR MIXING RATIO;

AEROSOLS; ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS; COOLING; EVAPORATION; EVAPORATIVE COOLING SYSTEMS; LAKES; MOISTURE; STORMS; VORTEX FLOW;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

AEROSOL; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; CLOUD CONDENSATION NUCLEUS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUPERCELL; TORNADO;

EID: 84858189621     PISSN: 00224928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-11-043.1     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arakawa, A., and V. Lamb, 1981: A potential enstrophy and energy conserving scheme for the shallow water equations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 18-36.
2. Bowen, E. G., 1950: The formation of rain by coalescence. Aust. J. Sci. Res., 3A, 193-213.
3. Braham, R. R., Jr., R. G. Semonin, A. H. Auer, S. A. Changnon Jr., and J. M. Hales, 1981. Summary of urban effects on clouds and rain. METROMEX: A Review and Summary, Meteor. Monogr., No. 40, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 141-152.
4. Brandes, E. A., 1978: Mesocyclone evolution and tornadogenesis: Some observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106, 995-1011.
5. Brooks, H. E., C. A. Doswell III, and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1994: The role of midtropospheric winds in the evolution and maintenance of low-level mesocyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 126-136.
6. Burgess, D. W., R. A. Brown, L. R. Lemon, and C. R. Safford, 1977: Evolution of a tornadic thunderstorm. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84-89.
7. Carrió,G. G., W. R. Cotton, and W. R. Cheng, 2010: Urban growth and aerosol effects on convection over Houston. Part I: The August 2000 case. Atmos. Res., 96, 560-574.
8. Clark, T. L., and R. D. Farley, 1984: Severe downslope windstorm calculations in two and three spatial dimensions using anelastic interactive grid nesting: A possible mechanism for gustiness. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 329-350.
9. Cotton, W., and Coauthors, 2003: RAMS 2001: Current status and future directions. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 5-29.
10. Davies-Jones, R. P., 1982a: A new look at the vorticity equation with application to tornadogenesis. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 249-252.
11. Davies-Jones, R. P., 1982b: Observational and theoretical aspects of tornadogenesis. Intense Atmospheric Vortices, L. Bengtsson and J. Lighthill, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 175-189.
12. Davies-Jones, R. P., 2000: Can the hook echo instigate tornadogenesis barotropically? Preprints, 20th Conf.on Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 269-272.
13. Davies-Jones, R. P., and H. E. Brooks, 1993: Mesocyclogenesis from a theoretical perspective. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 105-114.
14. Eagan, R. C., P. V. Hobbs, and L. F. Radke, 1974: Particle emissions from a large Kraft paper mill and their effects on the microstructure of warm clouds. J. Appl.Meteor., 13, 535-552.
15. Eskridge, R. E., and P. Das, 1976: Effect of a precipitation-driven downdraft on a rotating wind field: A possible trigger mechanism for tornadoes? J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 70-84.
16. Fan, J., R. Zhang,G. Li,W.-K. Tao, andX. Li, 2007: Simulations of cumulus clouds using a spectral microphysics cloudresolving model. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D04201, doi:10.1029/2006JD007688.
17. Feingold, G., R. L. Walko, B. Stevens, and W. R. Cotton, 1998: Simulations of marine stratocumulus using a new microphysical parameterization scheme. Atmos. Res., 47-48, 505-528.
18. Foote, G. B., 1984: A study of hail growth utilizing observed storm conditions. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 23, 84-101.
19. Gaudet, B. J., and W. R. Cotton, 2006: Low-level mesocyclonic concentration by nonaxisymmetric processes. Part I: Supercell and mesocyclone evolution. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1113-1133.
20. Gaudet, B. J., and W. R. Cotton, and M. T. Montgomery, 2006: Low-level mesocyclonic concentration by nonaxisymmetric transport: II. Vorticity dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1134-1150.
21. Gilmore, M. S., J.M. Straka, andE.N.Rasmussen, 2004: Precipitation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a simplemicrophysics scheme. Mon.Wea. Rev., 132, 2610-2627.
22. Grasso, L. D., 2000: The dissipation of a left-moving cell in a severe storm environment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 2797-2815.
23. Grasso, L. D., and W. R. Cotton, 1995: Numerical simulation of a tornado vortex. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1192-1203.
24. Hill,G. E., 1974: Factors controlling the size and spacing of cumulus clouds as revealed by numerical experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 646-673.
25. Hobbs, P. V., L. F. Radke, and S. E. Shumway, 1970: Cloud condensation nuclei from industrial sources and their apparent influence on precipitation in Washington State. J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 81-89.
26. Howells, P. C., R. Rotunno, and R. K. Smith, 1988:Acomparative study of atmospheric and laboratory-analogue numerical tornado-vortex models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114, 801-822.
27. Kaufman, Y. J., and T. Nakajima, 1993: Effect of Amazon smoke on cloud microphysics and albedo-Analysis from satellite imagery. J. Appl. Meteor., 32, 729-744.
28. Klemp, J. B., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1978: The simulation of threedimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1070-1096.
29. Koehler, K. A., S. M. Kreidenweiss, P. J. DeMott, M. D. Petters, A. J. Prenni, and C. M. Carrico, 2009: Hygroscopicity and cloud droplet activation of mineral dust aerosol. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L08805, doi:10.1029/2009GL037348.
30. Lemon, L. R., 1974: Interaction of two convective scales within a severe thunderstorm: A case study. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL NSSL-71, 43 pp.
31. Lerach, D. G., B. J. Gaudet, and W. R. Cotton, 2008: Idealized simulations of aerosol influences on tornadogenesis. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L23806, doi:10.1029/2008GL035617.
32. Leslie, L. M., and R. K. Smith, 1978: The effect of vertical stability on tornadogenesis. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1281-1288.
33. Li, G., Y. Wang, and R. Zhang, 2008: Implementation of a twomoment bulk microphysics scheme to the WRF model to investigate aerosol-cloud interaction. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15211, doi:10.1029/2007JD009361.
34. Lilly, D. K., 1962: On the numerical simulation of buoyant convection. Tellus, 14, 148-172.
35. Lim, K.-S. S., and S.-Y. Hong, 2010: Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1587-1612.
36. Ludlam, F. H., 1963: Severe local storms: A review. Severe Local Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 27, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1-30.
37. Markowski, P. M., 2002: Hook echoes and rear-flank downdrafts: A review. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 852-876.
38. Markowski, P. M., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2002: Direct surface thermodynamic observations within the rear-flank downdrafts of nontornadic and tornadic supercells. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1692-1721.
39. Markowski, P. M., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2003: Tornadogenesis resulting from the transport of circulation by a downdraft: Idealized numerical simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 795-823.
40. Meyers, M. P., R. L. Walko, J. Y. Harrington, and W. R. Cotton, 1997: New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization. Part II: The two-moment scheme. Atmos. Res., 45, 3-39.
41. Nelson, S. P., 1977: Rear flank downdraft: A hailstorm intensification mechanism. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 521-525.
42. Nolan, D. S., and B. F. Farrell, 1999: The structure and dynamics of tornado-like vortices. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2908-2936.
43. Pielke, R. A., and Coauthors, 1992: A comprehensive meteorological modeling system-RAMS.Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 49, 69-91.
44. Rosenfeld, D., 1999: TRMM observed first direct evidence of smoke from forest fires inhibiting rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3105-3108.
45. Rosenfeld, D., 2000: Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air pollution. Science, 287, 1793-1796.
46. Rotunno, R., 1979: A study in tornado-like vortex dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 140-155.
47. Rotunno, R., and J. B. Klemp, 1982: The influence of the shear-induced pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 136-151.
48. Saleeby, S. M., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: A large droplet mode and prognostic number concentration of cloud droplets in the Colorado State University Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). Part I: Module descriptions and supercell test simulations. J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 182-195.
49. Seifert, A., and K. D. Beheng, 2006: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part II: Maritime vs. continental deep convective storms. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 92, 67-82.
50. Smagorinsky, J., 1963: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 91, 99-164.
51. Snook, N., and M. Xue, 2008: Effects of microphysical drop size distribution on tornadogenesis in supercell thunderstorms. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L24803, doi:10.1029/2008GL035866.
52. Storer, R. L., S. van den Heever, and G. L. Stephens, 2010: Modeling aerosol impacts on convective storms in different environments. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3904-3915.
53. Tao, W.-K., X. Li, A. Khain, T. Matsui, S. Lang, and J. Simpson, 2007: Role of atmospheric aerosol concentration on deep convective precipitation: Cloud-resolving model simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S18, doi:10.1029/2007JD008728.
54. Trapp, R. J., 2000: A clarification of vortex breakdown and tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 888-895.
55. Trapp, R. J., and B. F. Fiedler, 1995: Tornado-like vortex genesis in a simplified numerical model. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3757-3778.
56. Tripoli, G. J., and W. R. Cotton, 1980:Anumerical investigation of several factors leading to the observed variable intensity of deep convection over south Florida. J. Appl. Meteor., 19, 1037-1063.
57. Tripoli, G. J., and W. R. Cotton, 1986: An intense, quasi-steady thunderstorm over mountainous terrain. Part IV: Three-dimensional numerical simulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 894-912.
58. van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596-1609.
59. van den Heever, S. C., G. G. Carrió, W. R. Cotton, P. J. DeMott, and A. J. Prenni, 2006: Impacts of nucleating aerosol on Florida storms. Part I: Mesoscale simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1752-1775.
60. Walko, R. L., 1993: Tornado spin-up beneath a convective cell: Required basic structure of the near-field boundary layerwinds. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, andHazards, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 89-95.
61. Wang, C., 2005:Amodeling study of the response of tropical deep convection to the increase of cloud condensation nuclei concentration: 1. Dynamics and microphysics. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21211, doi:10.1029/2004JD005720.
62. Wicker, L. J., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1993: Numerical simulation of tornadogenesis within a supercell thunderstorm. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 75-88.
63. Wicker, L. J., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1995: Simulation and analysis of tornado development and decay within a three-dimensional supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2675-2703.