A call for evidence-based decision making when selecting outcome measurement instruments for summary of findings tables in systematic reviews: Results from an OMERACT working group

Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1954-1961

  Beaton, Dorcas E ^a,b   Terwee, Caroline B ^c,d   Singh, Jasvinder A ^e,f   Hawker, Gillian A ^b,g   Patrick, Donald L ⁱ   Burke, Laurie B ^j   Toupin April, Karine ^k   Tugwell, Peter S ^h,l,m  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e BIRMINGHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^g WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^h Institute of Population Health   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^j CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^l OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^m UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Evidence based; Health status indicators; Outcome measurement; Reproducibility of results; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSENSUS ON SELECTION OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERMITTENT AND CONSTANT OSTEOARTHRITIS PAIN; KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS SCORE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME MEASUREMENT IN RHEUMATOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; WORKSHOP;

EID: 84943329509     PISSN: 0315162X     EISSN: 14992752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141446     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, Beaton D, Gossec L, D'Agostino MA, et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:745-53.
2. Kirwan JR, Boers M, Hewlett S, Beaton D, Bingham CO III, Choy E, et al. Updating the OMERACT filter: core areas as a basis for defining core outcome sets. J Rheumatol 2014;41:994-9.
3. Tugwell P, Boers M, D'Agostino MA, Beaton D, Boonen A, Bingham CO, III, et al. Updating the OMERACT filter: implications of filter 2.0 to select outcome instruments through assessment of "truth": content, face, and construct validity. J Rheumatol 2014;41:1000-4.
4. Clarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials 2007;8:39.
5. Boers M, Idzerda L, Kirwan JR, Beaton D, Escorpizo R, Boonen A, et al. Toward a generalized framework of core measurement areas in clinical trials: a position paper for OMERACT 11. J Rheumatol 2014;41:978-85.
6. Johnston BC, Patrick DL, Thorlund K, Busse JW, da Costa BR, Schunemann HJ, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses-part 2: methods for improving interpretability for decision-makers. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:211.
7. Johnston BC, Patrick DL, Busse JW, Schunemann HJ, Agarwal A, Guyatt GH. Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses-Part 1: assessing risk of bias and combining outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:109.
8. Gabriel SE, Normand SL. Getting the methods right-the foundation of patient-centered outcomes research. N Engl J Med 2012;367:787-90.
9. Ghogomu EA, Maxwell LJ, Buchbinder R, Rader T, Pardo PJ, Johnston RV, et al. Updated method guidelines for Cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews and metaanalyses. J Rheumatol 2014;41:194-205.
10. Juni P, Reichenbach S, Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis: rational approach to treating the individual. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006;20: 721-40.
11. Juhl C, Lund H, Roos EM, Zhang W, Christensen R. A hierarchy of patient-reported outcomes for meta-analysis of knee osteoarthritis trials: empirical evidence from a survey of high impact journals. Arthritis 2012;2012:136245.
12. Davis AM, Lohmander LS, Wong R, Venkataramanan V, Hawker GA. Evaluating the responsiveness of the ICOAP following hip or knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:1043-5.
13. Risser RC, Hochberg MC, Gaynor PJ, D'Souza DN, Frakes EP. Responsiveness of the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) scale in a trial of duloxetine for treatment of osteoarthritis knee pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013;21:691-4.
14. Fava GA, Ruini C, Rafanelli C. Psychometric theory is an obstacle to the progress of clinical research. Psychother Psychosom 2004;73:145-8.
15. Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics XLI. Hard science, soft data, and the challenges of choosing clinical variables in research. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1977;22:485-98.
16. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012;21:651-7.
17. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2009;18:1115-23.
18. Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, de Vet HC, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2012;21:659-70.
19. Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, Patrick D, Furukawa TA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:173-83.
20. Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon L, Strand V, Idzerda L. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials 2007;8:38.
21. Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P. The OMERACT Filter for outcome measures in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1998;25:198-9.
22. Kane MT. Validation as a pragmatic, scientific activity. J Educ Meas 2013;50:115-22.
23. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:240-52.
24. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
25. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:17.
26. Hawker GA, Davis AM, French MR, Cibere J, Jordan JM, March L, et al. Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure-an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:409-14.
27. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, Velikova G, Terwee CB, Snyder CF, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1889-905.
28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf
29. Kane MT. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. J Educ Meas 2013;50:1-73.
30. Beaton DE, Boers M, Tugwell P. Health outcomes assessment. In: Kelley's textbook of rheumatology. 9 ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2013:462-75.
31. Beaton DE, van Eerd D, Smith P, van der Velde G, Cullen K, Kennedy CA, et al. Minimal change is sensitive, less specific to recovery: a diagnostic testing approach to interpretability. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:487-96.
32. Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Mendivil J, Garin O, Rajmil L, Herdman M, et al. Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health 2008;11:700-8.
33. Law M. Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Can J Occup Ther 1987;54:133-8.
34. Auger C, Demers L, Swaine B. Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006;43:65-83.
35. Auger C, Demers L, Desrosiers J, Giroux F, Ska B, Wolfson C. Applicability of a toolkit for geriatric rehabilitation outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:97-109.
36. Feinstein AR, Wells CK, Joyce CM, Josephy BR. The evaluation of sensibility and the role of patient collaboration in clinimetric indexes. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 1985;98:146-9.
37. Tang K, Beaton DE, Lacaille D, Gignac MA, Bombardier C. Sensibility of five at-work productivity measures was endorsed by patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:546-56.
38. Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, King-Jones S, Ishaque S, Bhaloo Z, et al. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'. Trials 2014;15:247.
39. Wells G, Beaton DE, Tugwell P, Boers M, Kirwan JR, Bingham CO, III, et al. Updating the OMERACT filter: discrimination and feasibility. J Rheumatol 2014;41:1005-10.
40. Beaton DE, Boers M, Tugwell P. Outcome measurement, Ch. 30. In: Firestein GS, Budd RC, Gabriel SE, McInnes IB, O'Dell JR, eds. Kelley's textbook of rheumatology, 10th edition. Oxford: Saunders Elsevier; in press.
41. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539-49.
42. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Riphagen I, et al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2009;18:313-33.
43. Clarke M. The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic reviews. Br J Surg 2007;94:391-2.
44. Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, Lewis M, de Vet HC, Koes BW. Prognosis of patients with nonspecific neck pain: development and external validation of a prediction rule for persistence of complaints. Spine 2010;35:827-35.
45. Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Smith P, Van Eerd D, Tang K, Inrig T, et al. Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2013;22:2509-47.