Evaluating the responsiveness of the ICOAP following hip or knee replacement

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1043-1045

  Davis, A M ^a,b,c   Lohmander, L S ^d   Wong, R ^a   Venkataramanan, V ^a   Hawker, G A ^b,c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Hip and knee replacement; Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; INTERMITTENT AND CONSTANT OSTEOARTHRITIS PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE; KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTERS UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HIP; HUMANS; KNEE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77954759001     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Jensen M.P., Turner J.A., Romano J.M., Fisher L.D. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999, 83:157-162.
2. Bellamy N., Buchanan W., Goldsmith C., Campbell J., Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total knee or hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988, 1:95-108.
3. Hawker G.A., Stewart L., French M.R., Cibere J., Jordan J.M., March L., et al. Understanding the pain experience in hip and knee osteoarthritis - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:415-422.
4. Hawker G.A., Davis A.M., French M.R., Cibere J., Jordan J.M., March L., et al. Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure - an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:409-414.
5. Nilsdotter A.K., Lohmander L.S., Klassbo M., Roos E.M. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) - validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2003, 4:10.
6. Roos E.M., Lohmander L.S. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1(64).
7. Von Korff M., Jensen M., Karoly P. Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research. Spine 2000, 25-24:3140-3151.
8. Von Korff M., Ormel J., Keefe F., Dworkin S. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992, 50-2:133-149.
9. Jones C.A., Voaklander D.C., Johnston D.W., Suarez-Almazor M.E. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 2000, 27(7):1745-1752.
10. Bachmeier C.J.M., March L.M., Cross M.J., Lapsley H.M., Tribe K.L., Courtenay B.G., Brooks PM for the Arthritis Cost and Outcome Project Group and Arthritis Cost and Outcome Project Group A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001, 9(2):137-146.
11. Kennedy D.M., Stratford P.W., Hanna S.E., Wessel J., Gollish J.D. Modeling early recovery of physical function following hip and knee arthroplasy. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord 2006, 7:100.
12. Gandhi R., Peggy Tso, Davis A.M., Mahomed N.N. Outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in academic versus community hospitals. Can J Surg 2009, 52(5):413-416.
13. Faucher M., Poiraudeau S., Lefevre-Colau M.M., Rannou R., Fermanian J., Revel M. Algo-functional assessment of knee osteoarthritis: comparison of the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the WOMAC and Lequesne indexes. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2002, 10(8):602-610.
14. Kennedy D.M., Stratford P.W., Pagura S.M.C., Wessel J., Gollish J.D., Woodhouse L.J. Exploring the factorial validity and clinical interpretability of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Physiother Can 2003, 55:160-168.
15. Stratford P.W., Kennedy D. Does parallel item content on WOMAC's pain and function subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004, 5:17.