Applicability of a toolkit for geriatric rehabilitation outcomes

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 97-109

  Auger, Claudine ^a,b   Demers, Louise ^a,b   Desrosiers, Johanne ^c   Giroux, Francine ^a   Ska, Bernadette ^a,b   Wolfson, Christina ^a,d,e  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aged; Bench marking; Geriatric assessment; Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER BURDEN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; GERIATRIC REHABILITATION; HUMAN; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT INDEX;

EID: 33947212448     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280600731540     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Heineman, A. W. (2005) Putting outcome measurement in context: A rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, pp. 6-14.
2. Finch, E., Brooks, D., Stratford, P. W. and Mayo, N. (2002) Physical rehabilitation outcome measures, a guide to enhanced clinical decision making, Decker, Hamilton, BC
3. Latham, N. K. and Haley, S. M. (2003) Measuring functional outcomes across postacute care: Current challenges and future directions. Critical Reviews in Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 15, pp. 83-98.
4. Lai, S.-M., Perera, S., Duncan, P. W. and Bode, R. (2003) Physical and social functioning after stroke: Comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36. Stroke, 34, pp. 488-493.
5. Wells, J., Seabrook, J., Stolee, P., Borrie, M. and Knoefel, F. (2003) State of the art in geriatric rehabilitation. Part I: Review of frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, pp. 890-897.
6. Hoeing, H., Nusbaum, N. and Brummel-Smith, K. (1997) Geriatric rehabilitation state of the art. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, pp. 1371-1381.
7. Demers, L., Desrosiers, J., Ska, B., Wolfson, C., Nikolova, R., Pervieux, I. and Auger, C. (2005) Assembling a toolkit to measure geriatric rehabilitation outcomes. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, pp. 460-472.
8. Duncan, P., Lai, S.-M., van Culin, V., Huang, L., Clausen, D. and Wallace, D. (1999) Development of a comprehensive assessment toolbox for stroke. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 15, pp. 885-915.
9. Arns, P., Rogers, S., Cook, J. and Mowbray, C. (2001) The IAPRSR toolkit: Development, utility, and relation to other performance measurement systems. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, pp. 43-52.
10. Chapko, M., Rothman, M. L., Ehreth, J., Hedrick, S. C., Sullivan, J., Erdly, W. and Cooper, S. (1993) Data collection in the adult day health care evaluation study. Medical Care, 31, pp. SS15-SS25.
11. Demers, L., Ska, B., Desrosiers, J., Alix, C. and Wolfson, C. (2004) Development of a conceptual framework for the assessment of geriatric rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 38, pp. 221-237.
12. VanSwearingen, J. M. and Brach, J. S. (2001) Making geriatric assessment work - selecting useful measures. Physical Therapy, 81, pp. 1233-1251.
13. Law, M. (1987) Measurement in occupational therapy: Scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, pp. 133-138.
14. Gonzalez-Gordon, R. G., Salvador-Carulla, L., Romero, C., Gonzalez-Saiz, F. and Romero, D. (2002) Feasibility, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of psychiatric assessment schedule for adults with developmental disability: A structured psychiatric interview for intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, pp. 209-217.
15. Salter, K., Jutai, J. W., Teasell, R., Foley, N. C. and Bitensky, J. (2005) Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, pp. 191-207.
16. Wade, D. T. (2004) Assessment, measurement and data collection tools. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, pp. 233-237.
17. Andresen, E. M. (2000) Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, pp. S15-S20.
18. Auger, C., Demers, L. and Swaine, B. (1899) Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
19. Bureau-Chalot, F., Novella, J. L., Jolly, D., Ankri, J., Guillemin, F. and Blanchard, F. (2002) Feasibility, acceptability and internal consistency reliability of the Nottingham Health Profile in dementia patients. Gerontology, 48, pp. 220-225.
20. Nakayama, T., Toyoda, H., Ohno, K., Yoshiike, N. and Futagami, T. (2000) Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-being Schedule (GWSB). Quality of Life Research, 9, pp. 529-539.
21. Andresen, E. M., Rothenberg, B. M. and Kaplan, R. M. (1998) Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the quality of well-being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Medical Care, 36, pp. 1349-1360.
22. Chan, T. S., Lam, L. C., Chiu, H. F. and Prince, M. (2003) Validity and applicability of the Chinese version of community screening instrument for dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 15, pp. 10-18.
23. Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., Arnold, D. and Wolfson, C. (2002) Reliability validity and applicability of the Quebec user assistive technology QUEST 2.0 for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, pp. 21-30.
24. Norén, A. M., Bogren, U., Bolin, J. and Stenstrom, C. (2001) Balance assessment in patients with peripheral arthritis: Applicability and reliability of some clinical assessments. Physiotherapy Research International, 6, pp. 193-204.
25. Goodgold, S., Kiami, S., Ule, D., Schoenberg, A. and Forman, G. (2001) Applicability of the Functional Reach and Timed up and go tests for elderly individuals with Alzheimer's disease: Pilot investigation. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 19, pp. 21-36.
26. Kane, R. L. and Kane, R. A. (2000) Assessing older persons, measures, meaning, and practical applications, p. 542. Oxford University Press, Oxford
27. Streiner, D. L. and Norman, G. R. (2003) Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, Oxford University Press, New York
28. Pinsonnault, E., Desrosiers, J., Dubuc, N., Kalfat, H., Colvez, A. and Delli-Colli, N. (2003) Functional autonomy measurement system: Development of a social subscale. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 37, pp. 223-233.
29. Hébert, R., Carrier, R. and Bilodeau, A. (1988) The functional autonomy measurement system SMAF: Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and Aging, 17, pp. 293-302.
30. Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hébert, R. and Dubuc, N. (1995) Reliability of the functional autonomy measurement system SMAF revised for epidemiologic study. Age and Aging, 24, pp. 402-406.
31. Desrosiers, J., Rochette, A., Noreau, L., Bravo, G., Hébert, R. and Boutin, C. (2003) Comparison of two functional independence scales with a participation measure in post-stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 37, pp. 157-172.
32. Carbonneau, H., Hélie, C. and Ouellet, G. (1994) Évaluation d'un programme d'éducation au loisir, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières
33. Podsiadlo, D. and Richardson, S. (1991) The Timed up and go a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 39, pp. 142-148.
34. Freter, S. H. and Fruchter, N. (2000) Relationship between Timed 'up and go' and gait time in an elderly orthopaedic rehabilitation population. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14, pp. 96-101.
35. Whitney, J. C., Lord, S. R. and Close, J. C. (2005) Streamlining assessment and intervention in a falls clinic using the Timed up and go test and physiological profile assessments. Age and Ageing, 34, pp. 567-571.
36. Shumway-Cook, A., Brauer, S. and Woollacott, M. (2000) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed up & go test. Physical Therapy, 80, pp. 896-903.
37. Morris, S., Morris, M. and Iansek, R. (2001) Reliability of measurements obtained with the Timed 'up & go' test in people with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy, 81, pp. 810-818.
38. Schoppen, T., Boonstra, A., Groothoff, J. W., de Vries, J., Goeken, L. N. and Eisma, W. H. (1999) The Timed 'up and go' test: Reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, pp. 825-828.
39. Rockwood, K., Awalt, E., Carver, D. and MacKnight, C. (2000) Feasibility and measurement properties of the Functional Reach and the Timed up and go tests in the Canadian study of health and aging. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 55, pp. M70-M73.
40. Jensen, M., Karoly, P. and Braver, S. (1986) The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain, 27, pp. 117-126.
41. Stratford, P. W., Spadoni, G., Kennedy, D., Westaway, M. D. and Alcock, G. K. (2002) Seven points to consider when investigating a measure's ability to detect change. Physiotherapy Canada, pp. 16-24.
42. Mathiowetz, V., Volland, G., Kashman, N. and Weber, K. (1985) Adult norms for the Box and Block test of manual dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, pp. 386-391.
43. Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hebert, R., Dutil, E. and Mercier, L. (1994) Validation of the Box and Block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, pp. 751-755.
44. Desrosiers, J., Hebert, R., Bravo, G. and Dutil, E. (1995) Upper extremity performance test for the elderly (TEMPA): Normative data and correlates with sensorimotor parameters. Test d'évaluation des membres supérieurs de personnes âgées. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 76, pp. 1125-1129.
45. Dupuy, H. (1978) Self-representation of general psychological well-being of American adults, American Public Health Association Meeting, Los Angeles, CA
46. Fazio, A. F. (1977) A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-being Schedule. Vital & Health Statistics - Series 2: Data Evaluation & Methods Research, pp. 1-53.
47. Bravo, G., Gaulin, P. and Dubois, M. -F. (1996) Validation d'une échelle de bien-être général auprès d'une population âgée de 50 à 75 ans. Canadian Journal on Aging, 15, pp. 112-128.
48. McDowell, I. and Newell, C. (1996) Measuring health a guide to rating scales and questionnaires, Oxford University Press, New York
49. Teng, E. L. and Chui, H. C. (1987) The Modified Mini-mental State (3MS) examination. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, pp. 314-318.
50. Folstein, M., Folstein, S. and McHugh, P. (1975) Mini-mental State a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 17, pp. 37-49.
51. Bravo, G. and Hebert, R. (1997) Age- and education-specific reference values for the Mini-mental and Modified Mini-mental State Examinations derived from a non-demented elderly population. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, pp. 1008-1018.
52. Montgomery, R., Gonyea, J. and Hooyman, R. (1985) Caregiving and the experience of subjective and objective burden. Family relations, p. 34.
53. Montgomery, R JV, Borgatta, E. F. and Borgatta, M. L. (2000) Societal and family change in the burden of care. Who should care for the elderly? An East-west value divide, pp. 27-52. The National University of Singapore Press, Singapore
54. Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N. and Pierce, G. R. (1987) A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, pp. 497-510.
55. Sarason, I., Levine, H., Basham, R. and Sarason, B. (1983) Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, pp. 127-139.
56. Charlson, M., Pompei, P., Ales, M. and MacKenzie, C. (1987) A new method of classifiying comorbidity in studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40, pp. 373-393.
57. Dodds, T. A., Martin, D. P., Stolov, W. C. and Deyo, R. A. (1993) A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, pp. 531-536.
58. Deyo, R. A., Cherkin, D. C. and Ciol, M. A. (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, pp. 613-619.
59. Hébert, R. and Guilbeault, J. (2002) Guide d'utilisation du Système de Mesure de l'Autonomie Fonctionnelle. Sherbrooke
60. Husted, J., Cook, R., Farewell, V. and Gladman, D. (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, pp. 459-468.
61. (2003) SPSS for windows, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL
62. Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, pp. 159-174.
63. Pinsonnault, E., Desrosiers, J., Dubuc, N., Kalfat, H., Colvez, A. and Delli-Colli, N. (2002) Développement d'une dimension sociale au Système de Mesure de l'Autonomie Fonctionnelle. Le Gérontophile, 24, pp. 11-17.
64. Siggeirsdottir, K., Jonsson, B. Y., Jonsson, H. J. and Iwarsson, S. (2002) The timed 'up & go' is dependent on chair type. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, pp. 609-616.
65. Eekhof, J AH, De Bock, G. H., Schaapveld, K. and Springer, M. P. (2001) Functional mobility assessment at home. Canadian Family Physician, 47, pp. 1205-1207.
66. Meyers, A. R. and Andresen, E. M. (2000) Enabling our instruments: Accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, p. 81.