Standard Comorbidity Measures Do Not Predict Patient-reported Outcomes 1 Year After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 473, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 3370-3379

  Greene, Meridith E ^a,b,c   Rolfson, Ola ^a,b,c   Gordon, Max ^b,d   Garellick, Göran ^b,c   Nemes, Szilard ^b,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; ICD-10; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTER; SELF REPORT; STANDARD; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CONVALESCENCE; HIP; HIP REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWEDEN; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84942828486     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4195-z     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahmad MA, Xypnitos FN, Giannoudis PV. Measuring hip outcomes: common scales and checklists. Injury Int J Care Inj. 2011;42:259–264.
2. Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010;11:203–209.
3. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CF, Hopkinson WJ. Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:1008–1009.
4. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.
5. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54:61–76.
6. Dominick KL, Dudley TK, Coffman CJ, Bosworth HB. Comparison of three comorbidity measures for predicting health service use in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum Arthritis Care Res. 2005;53:666–672.
7. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L. What’s all that noise? The effect of co-morbidity on health outcome questionnaire results after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:119–126.
8. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.
9. EuroQolGroup. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.
10. Gordon M, Frumento P, Skoldenberg O, Greene M, Garellick G, Rolfson O. Women in Charnley class C fail to improve in mobility to a higher degree after total hip replacement. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:335–341.
11. Gordon M, Stark A, Skoldenberg OG, Karrholm J, Garellick G. The influence of comorbidity scores on re-operations following primary total hip replacement: comparison and validation of three comorbidity measures. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:1184–1191.
12. Greene ME, Rolfson O, Nemes S, Gordon M, Malchau H, Garellick G. Education attainment is associated with patient-reported outcomes: findings from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1868–1876.
13. Karrholm J, Garellick G, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2007. Gothenburg, Sweden: Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register; 2008.
14. Lavernia CJ, Laoruengthana A, Contreras JS, Rossi MD. All-patient refined diagnosis-related groups in primary arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:19–23.
15. Lix LM, Quail J, Teare G, Acan B. Performance of comorbidity measures for predicting outcomes in population-based osteoporosis cohorts. Osteoporosis Int. 2011;22:2633–2643.
16. McGuigan FX, Hozack WJ, Moriarty L, Eng K, Rothman RH. Predicting quality-of-life outcomes following total joint arthroplasty. Limitations of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:742–747.
17. Mnatzaganian G, Ryan P, Hiller JE. Does co-morbidity provide significant improvement on age adjustment when predicting medical outcomes? Methods Inf Med. 2014;53:115–120.
18. Mnatzaganian G, Ryan P, Norman PE, Hiller JE. Accuracy of hospital morbidity data and the performance of comorbidity scores as predictors of mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:107–115.
19. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi J-C, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–1139.
20. Röder C, Staub LP, Eggli S, Dietrich D, Busato A, Muller U. Influence of preoperative functional status on outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:11–17.
21. Röder C, Staub LP, Eichler P, Widmer M, Dietrich D, Eggli S, Muller U. Avoiding misclassification bias with the traditional Charnley classification: rationale for a fourth Charnley class BB. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:1803–1808.
22. Rolfson O, Karrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:867–875.
23. Sharabiani MTA, Aylin P, Bottle A. Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data. Med Care. 2012;50:1109–1118.