The influence of comorbidity scores on re-operations following primary total hip replacement: Comparison and validation of three comorbidity measures

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 95 B, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1184-1191

  Gordon, M ^a,b   Stark, A ^a   Skoldenberg O G ^a   Karrholm J ^b,c   Garellick, G ^b,c  

^a DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register   (Sweden)

^c SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY AT UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFOUNDING VARIABLE; ELIXHAUSER COMORBIDITY INDEX; FEMALE; HAZARD RATIO; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REGISTER; REOPERATION; SURGICAL RISK; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

CHARLSON INDEX; COMORBIDITY; ELIXHAUSERS INDEX; RCS CHARLSON INDEX; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84885391355     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.31006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sedrakyan A, Paxton EW, Phillips C, et al. The International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries: Overview and summary. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A(SUPPL.):1-12.
2. Ranstam J, Kärrholm J, Pulkkinen P, et al. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. II. Guidelines. Acta Orthop 2011;82:258-267.
3. Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: Available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol 2010;11:203-209.
4. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases (ICD). http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/(date last accessed 18 June 2013).
5. Paxton EW, Furnes O, Namba RS, et al. Comparison of the Norwegian knee arthroplasty register and a United States arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A(SUPPL.):20-30.
6. Saklad M. Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 1941;2:281-284.
7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-383.
8. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998;36:8-27.
9. Armitage JN, van der Meulen JH. Identifying co-morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score. Br J Surg 2010;97:772-781.
10. Kärrholm J. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (www.shpr.se). Acta Orthop 2010;81:3-4.
11. The National Patient Register. National Board of Health and Welfare. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/register/halsodataregister/patientregistret/ inenglish (date last accessed 16 June 2013).
12. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-682.
13. van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H, Forster AJ. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 2009;47:626-633.
14. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43:1130-1139.
15. Gordon M. G-Forge: Comorbidity measures. http://gforge.se/calc- comorbidity-measures/(date last accessed 6 June 2013).
16. Kreder HJ, Deyo RA, Koepsell T, Swiontkowski MF, Kreuter W. Relationship between the volume of total hip replacements performed by providers and the rates of postoperative complications in the state of Washington. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79-A:485-494.
17. Harrell JFE. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies, 2013. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms (date last accessed 18 June 2013).
18. Gray B. cmprsk: Subdistribution Analysis of Competing Risks, 2013. http://CRAN.Rproject. org/package=cmprsk (date last accessed 18 June 2013).
19. Gordon M. G-Forge: Gmisc. http://gforge.se/Gmisc/(date last accessed 6 June 2013).
20. Brenner H, Blettner M. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 1997;8:429-434.
21. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974;19:716-723.
22. Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer, 2001.
23. Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994;81:515-526.
24. Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2010. http://www.shpr.se/(date last accessed 8 May 2013).
25. Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011;11:450.
26. McMinn DJW, Snell KIE, Daniel J, et al. Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: Registry based cohort study. BMJ 2012;344:3319.
27. Johnsen SP, Sørensen HT, Lucht U, et al. Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short-and long-terms: A nationwide Danish follow-up study including 36,984 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:1303-1308.
28. Soohoo NF, Farng E, Lieberman JR, Chambers L, Zingmond DS. Factors that predict short-term complication rates after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2363-2371.
29. Wainwright C, Theis JC, Garneti N, Melloh M. Age at hip or knee joint replacement surgery predicts likelihood of revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:1411-1415.
30. Fender D, van der Meulen JH, Gregg PJ. Relationship between outcome and annual surgical experience for the charnley total hip replacement: Results from a regional hip register. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:187-190.
31. Bozic KJ, Maselli J, Pekow PS, et al. The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2010;92-A:2643-2652.
32. Manley M, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM. Effect of volume on total hip arthroplasty revision rates in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:2446-2451.
33. Sundararajan V, Quan H, Halfon P, et al. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index. Med Care 2007;45:1210-1215.