Avoiding miclassification bias with the traditional Charnley classification: Rationale for a fourth Charnley class BB

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1803-1808

  Roder C ^a   Staub, L P ^a   Eichler, P ^a   Widmer, M ^a   Dietrich, D ^a   Eggli, S ^a   Müller, Urs ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bilateral total hip arthoplasty (THA); Charnley classification; Outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISEASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISABLED PERSON; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HIP; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); WALKING;

EID: 33748927825     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20224     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Charnley J. 1972. Long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54:61-76.
2. Röder C, Parvizi J, Eggli S, et al. 2003. Demographic factors affecting long-term outcome of a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 417:62-73.
3. Dunbar J, Robertsson O, Ryd L. 2004. What's all that noise? Acta Orthop Scand 75:119-126.
4. Paterson D. 1993. The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES). Orthopedics 16:11-14.
5. Röder C, Eggli S, EL-Kerdi A, et al. 2003. The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES)- 10-years experience. Int Orthopedics 27:259-261.
6. Brinker M, Lund P, Cox D, Barrack R. 1996. Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7:820-830.
7. Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. 1998. Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:600-606.
8. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH, Harris WH, et al. 1990. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hHip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:161-168.