A review of planetary boundary layer parameterization schemes and their sensitivity in simulating southeastern U.S. cold season severe weather environments

Weather and Forecasting

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 591-612

  Cohen, Ariel E ^a,b   Cavallo, Steven M ^b   Coniglio, Michael C ^c   Brooks, Harold E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL SEVERE STORMS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundary layer; Mesoscale forecasting; Numerical weather prediction forecasting; Severe storms; Tornadoes

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS; BOUNDARY LAYERS; FORECASTING; MIXING; POTENTIAL ENERGY; RAIN; SHOCK TUBES; STORMS; TORNADOES; TROPOSPHERE; TURBULENT FLOW;

CONVECTIVE AVAILABLE POTENTIAL ENERGIES; MESOSCALE FORECASTING; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION/FORECASTING; PARAMETERIZATION SCHEMES; PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYERS; SEVERE STORMS; SUB-GRID SCALE PROCESS; WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING MODELS;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

MESOSCALE METEOROLOGY; MIXED LAYER; PARAMETERIZATION; POTENTIAL ENERGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEVERE WEATHER; TORNADO; TROPOSPHERE; TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER; TURBULENT MIXING; WEATHER FORECASTING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942740049     PISSN: 08828156     EISSN: 15200434     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00105.1     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Angevine, W.M., 2005:An integrated turbulence scheme for boundary layers with shallow cumulus applied to pollutant transport. J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 1436-1452, doi:10.1175/JAM2284.1.
2. Angevine, W.M., H. Jiang, and T. Mauritsen, 2010: Performance of an eddy diffusivity-mass flux scheme for shallow cumulus boundary layers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 2895-2912, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3142.1.
3. Ashley, W. S., 2007: Spatial and temporal analysis of tornado fatalities in the United States: 1880-2005. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 1214-1228, doi:10.1175/2007WAF2007004.1.
4. Bothwell, P. D., J. A. Hart, and R. L. Thompson, 2002: An integrated three-dimensional objective analysis scheme in use at the Storm Prediction Center. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms/19th Conf. on weather Analysis and Forecasting/15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., JP3.1. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/47482.pdf.].
5. Bougeault, P., and P. Lacarrère, 1989: Parameterization of orographyinduced turbulence in a mesobeta-scale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1872-1890, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1872: POOITI>2.0.CO;2.
6. Bretherton, C. S., and S. Park, 2009: A new moist turbulence parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Climate, 22, 3422-3448, doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2556.1.
7. Bright, D. R., and S. L. Mullen, 2002: The sensitivity of the numerical simulation of the southwest monsoon boundary layer to the choice of PBL turbulence parameterization in MM5. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 99-114, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0099: TSOTNS>2.0.CO;2.
8. Brooks, H. E., 2009: Proximity soundings for Europe and the United States from reanalysis data. Atmos. Res., 93, 546-553, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.10.005.
9. Bunkers, M. J., B. A. Klimowski, J. W. Zeitler, R. L. Thompson, and M. L. Weisman, 2000: Predicting supercell motion using a new hodograph technique. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 61-79, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0061:PSMUAN>2.0.CO;2.
10. Burk, S. D., and W. T. Thompson, 1989: A vertically nested regional numerical weather prediction model with second-order closure physics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 2305-2324, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<2305:AVNRNW>2.0.CO;2.
11. Ching, J., R. Rotunno, M. LeMone, A. Martilli, B. Kosovic, P. A. Jimenez, and J. Dudhia, 2014: Convectively induced secondary circulations in fine-grid mesoscale numerical weather prediction models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 3284-3302, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-00318.1.
12. Clements, K. W., and J. A. Frenkel, 1980: Exchange rates, money and relative prices: The dollar-pound in the 1920s. J. Int. Econ., 10, 249-262, doi:10.1016/0022-1996(80)90057-4.
13. Coniglio, M. C., 2012: Verification ofRUC0-1-h forecasts and SPC mesoscale analyses using VORTEX2 soundings. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 667-683, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-11-00096.1.
14. Coniglio, M. C., J. Correia, P. T. Marsh, and F. Kong, 2013: Verification of convection-allowing WRF Model forecasts of the planetary boundary layer using sounding observations. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 842-862, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-12-00103.1.
15. Craven, J. P., and H. E. Brooks, 2004: Baseline climatology of sounding derived parameters associated with deep, moist convection. Natl. Wea. Dig., 28, 13-24.
16. Davies-Jones, R. P., D. Burgess, and M. Foster, 1990: Test of helicity as a forecasting parameter. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 588-592.
17. Ek, M. B., K. E. Mitchell, Y. Lin, P. Grunmann, E. Rodgers, G. Gayno, and V. Koren, 2003: Implementation of the upgraded Noah land surface model in the NCEP operational mesoscale Eta model. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851, doi:10.1029/2002JD003296.
18. García-Díez, M., J. Fernández, L. Fita, and C. Yagüe, 2013: Seasonal dependence of WRF Model biases and sensitivity to PBL schemes over Europe. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 501-514, doi:10.1002/qj.1976.
19. Gibbs, J. A., E. Fedorovich, and A. M. J. van Eijk, 2011: Evaluating Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model predictions of turbulent flow parameters in a dry convective boundary layer. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 50, 2429-2444, doi:10.1175/2011JAMC2661.1.
20. Grenier, H., and C. S. Bretherton, 2001: A moist PBL parameterization for large-scale models and its application to subtropical cloud-topped marine boundary layers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 357-377, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0357:AMPPFL>2.0.CO;2.
21. Guyer, J. L., and A. R. Dean, 2010: Tornadoes within weak CAPE environments across the continental United States. Preprints, 25th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1.5. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/175725.pdf.].
22. Guyer, J. L., D. A. Imy, A. Kis, and K. Venable, 2006: Cool season significant (F2-F5) tornadoes in the Gulf Coast states. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Severe Local Storms, St. Louis, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 4.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/115320.pdf.].
23. Hacker, J. P., 2010: Spatial and temporal scales of boundary layer wind predictability in response to small-amplitude land surface uncertainty. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 217-233, doi:10.1175/2009JAS3162.1.
24. Hart, J. A., J. Whistler, R. Lindsay, and M. Kay, 1999: NSHARP, version 3.10. Storm Prediction Center, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Norman, OK, 33 pp.
25. Haylock, M. R., N. Hofstra, A. M. G. Klein Tank, E. J. Klok, P. D. Jones, and M. New, 2008: A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of surface temperature and precipitation. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20119, doi:10.1029/2008JD010201.
26. Holton, J. R., 2004: Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 4th ed. Elsevier, 535 pp.
27. Holtslag, A. A.M., and B. A. Boville, 1993: Local versus nonlocal boundary-layer diffusion in a global climate model. J. Climate, 6, 1825-1842, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1825: LVNBLD>2.0.CO;2.
28. Hong, S.-Y., and H.-L. Pan, 1996: Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2322-2339, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2322: NBLVDI>2.0.CO;2.
29. Hong, S.-Y., and J. O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129-151.
30. Hong, S.-Y., S. Y. Noh, and J. Dudhia, 2006: A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2318-2341, doi:10.1175/MWR3199.1.
31. Hu, X.-M., J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, and F. Zhang, 2010: Evaluation of three planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF Model. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 1831-1844, doi:10.1175/2010JAMC2432.1.
32. Huang, H.-Y., A. Hall, and J. Teixeira, 2013: Evaluation of the WRF PBL parameterizations for marine boundary layer clouds: Cumulus and stratocumulus. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2265-2271, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00292.1.
33. Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins, 2008: Radiative forcing by longlived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, doi:10.1029/2008JD009944.
34. Janjić, Z. I., 1990: The step-mountain coordinate: Physical package. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1429-1443, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1429:TSMCPP>2.0.CO;2.
35. Janjić, Z. I., 1994: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927-945, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0927:TSMECM>2.0.CO;2.
36. Janjić, Z. I., 1996: The surface layer in the NCEP Eta Model. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Norfolk, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 354-355.
37. Jankov, I., W. A. Gallus, M. Segal, B. Shaw, and S. E. Koch, 2005: The impact of different WRF Model physical parameterizations and their interactions on warm season MCS rainfall. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 1048-1060, doi:10.1175/WAF888.1.
38. Johns, R. H., and C. A. Doswell III, 1992: Severe local storms forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 7, 588-612, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1992)007<0588:SLSF>2.0.CO;2.
39. Kain, J. S., M. E. Baldwin, P. R. Janish, S. J. Weiss, M. P. Kay, and G. W. Carbin, 2003: Subjective verification of numerical models as a component of a broader interaction between research and operations. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 847-860, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0847:SVONMA>2.0.CO;2.
40. Kain, J. S., S. J. Weiss, M. E. Baldwin, G. W. Carbin, D. A. Bright, J. J. Levit, and J. A. Hart, 2005: Evaluating high-resolution configurations of the WRF Model that are used to forecast severe convective weather: The 2005 SPC/NSSL Spring Program. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/17th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Washington, DC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2A.5. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/94843.pdf.].
41. Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2013: A feasibility study for probabilistic convection initiation forecasts based on explicit numerical guidance. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 1213-1225, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00264.1.
42. Kis, A. K., and J. M. Straka, 2010: Nocturnal tornado climatology. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 545-561, doi:10.1175/2009WAF2222294.1.
43. Kosović, B., and J. A. Curry, 2000: A large eddy simulation study of a quasi-steady stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1052-1068, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1052: ALESSO>2.0.CO;2.
44. Mass, C. F., D. Ovens, K. Westrick, and B. A. Colle, 2002: Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecasts? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 407-430, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0407:DIHRPM>2.3.CO;2.
45. Mauritsen, T., G. Svensson, S. S. Zilitinkevich, I. Esau, L. Enger, and B. Grisogono, 2007: A total turbulent energy closure model for neutrally and stably stratified atmospheric boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 4113-4126, doi:10.1175/2007JAS2294.1.
46. Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1791-1806, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1791: AHOTCM>2.0.CO;2.
47. Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 851-875, doi:10.1029/RG020i004p00851.
48. Monin, A. S., and A. M. Obukhov, 1954: Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere (in Russian). Tr. Geofiz. Inst., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 24, 1963-1967.
49. Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2004: An improved Mellor-Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: Its design and verification. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 112, 1-31, doi:10.1023/B:BOUN.0000020164.04146.98.
50. Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2006: An improved Mellor-Yamada level-3 model: Its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 119, 397-407, doi:10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8.
51. Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2009: Development of an improved turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 87, 895-912, doi:10.2151/jmsj.87.895.
52. NCAR, cited 2013: NCEP FNL operational model global tropospheric analyses, continuing from July 1999. Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research. [Available online at http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2/.].
53. NCAR, cited 2014: NCAR Command Language. [Available online at http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/.].
54. Nielsen-Gammon, J. W., X.-M. Hu, F. Zhang, and J. E. Pleim, 2010: Evaluation of planetary boundary layer scheme sensitivities for the purpose of parameter estimation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 3400-3417, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3292.1.
55. NOAA/NCDC, cited 2014: Model Data Inventories. NOAA/National Operational Model Archive and Distribution System. [Available online at http://nomads.ncdc.noaa.gov/data.php?name5inventory.].
56. NOAA/NCDC, cited 2014: RUC online archive. [Available online at http://nomads.ncdc.noaa.gov/data/ruc/.].
57. Pindyck, R. S., and D. L. Rubinfeld, 1981: Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 630 pp.
58. Pleim, J. E., 2007: A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Model description and testing. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 1383-1395, doi:10.1175/JAM2539.1.
59. Pleim, J. E., 2007: A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part II: Application and evaluation in a mesoscale meteorological model. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 1396-1409, doi:10.1175/JAM2534.1.
60. Rasmussen, E. N., and D. O. Blanchard, 1998: A baseline climatology of sounding-derived supercell and tornado forecast parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 1148-1164, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<1148:ABCOSD>2.0.CO;2.
61. Schneider, J. M., and D. K. Lilly, 1999: An observational and numerical study of a sheared, convective boundary layer. Part I: Phoenix II observations, statistical description, and visualization. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 3059-3078, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<3059:AOANSO>2.0.CO;2.
62. Schneider, R. S., and A. R. Dean, 2008: A comprehensive 5-year severe storm environment climatology for the continental United States. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 16A.4. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/141748.pdf.].
63. Shin, H. H., and S.-Y. Hong, 2011: Intercomparison of planetary boundary-layer parameterizations in the WRF Model for a single day from CASES-99. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 139, 261-281, doi:10.1007/s10546-010-9583-z.
64. Skamarock, W. C., and Coauthors, 2008: A description of the Advanced Research WRF version 3. NCAR Tech. Note TN-4751STR, 113 pp. [Available online at http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/docs/arw_v3.pdf.].
65. Stensrud, D. J., 2007: Parameterization Schemes: Keys to Understanding Numerical Weather Prediction Models. Cambridge University Press, 459 pp.
66. Storm Prediction Center, cited 2013: SPC hourly mesoscale analysis. [Available online at http://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/ma_archive/.].
67. Storm Prediction Center, cited 2013: Storm Prediction Center National Severe Weather database browser: Online SeverePlot 3.0. [Available online at http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/sp3/plot.php.].
68. Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp.
69. Stull, R. B., 1991: Static stability-An update. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 72, 1521-1529, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072<1521: SSU>2.0.CO;2.
70. Stull, R. B., 1993: Review of non-local mixing in turbulent atmospheres: Transilient turbulence theory. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 62, 21-96, doi:10.1007/BF00705546.
71. Sukoriansky, S., B. Galperin, and V. Perov, 2005: Application of a new spectral theory of stably stratified turbulence to the atmospheric boundary layer over sea ice. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 117, 231-257, doi:10.1007/s10546-004-6848-4.
72. Theil, H., 1961: Economic Forecasts and Policy. 2nd Ed. North-Holland, 567 pp.
73. Theil, H., 1966: Applied Economic Forecasting. North-Holland, 474 pp.
74. Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L. Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1243-1261, doi:10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<1243:CPSWSE>2.0.CO;2.
75. Theil, H., C. M. Mead, and R. Edwards, 2007: Effective stormrelative helicity and bulk shear in supercell thunderstorm environments. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 102-115, doi:10.1175/WAF969.1.
76. Trnka, M., J. Eitzinger, G. Gruszczynski, K. Buchgraber, R. Resch, and A. Schaumberger, 2006: A simple statistical model for predicting herbage production from permanent grassland. Grass Forage Sci., 61, 253-271, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2006.00530.x.
77. Troen, L., and L. Mahrt, 1986: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer: Sensitivity to surface evaporation. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 37, 129-148, doi:10.1007/BF00122760.
78. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, cited 2014: Image archive meteorological case study collection kit. [Available online at http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/imagearchive/.].
79. Vescio, M. D., and R. L. Thompson, 1998: Some meteorological conditions associated with isolated F3-F5 tornadoes in the cool season. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2-4.
80. Weiss, S. J., M. E. Pyle, Z. Janjić, D. R. Bright, and G. J. DiMego, 2008: The operational high resolution window WRF Model runs at NCEP: Advantages of multiple model runs for severe convective weather forecasting. Preprints, 24th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Savannah, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P10.8. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/142192.pdf.].
81. Wyngaard, J. C., and R. A. Brost, 1984: Top-down and bottom-up diffusion of a scalar in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 102-112, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<0102: TDABUD>2.0.CO;2.
82. Xie, B., J. C.-H. Fung, A. Chan, and A. K.-H. Lau, 2012: Evaluation of nonlocal and local planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF Model. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D12103, doi:10.1029/2011JD017080.