Taking the operant paradigm into the field: Associative learning in wild great tits

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2015, Pages

  Morand Ferron, Julie ^a,b   Hamblin, Steven ^c   Cole, Ella F ^b   Aplin, Lucy M ^b   Quinn, John L ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ADULT ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; JUVENILE ANIMAL; LEARNING TEST; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NONHUMAN; PARUS MAJOR; SCORING SYSTEM; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; WINTER; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BIRD; COGNITION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIRDS; COGNITION; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; ECOLOGY; FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 84942626775     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133821     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Shettleworth SJ. Cognition, evolution, and behavior. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
2. Lipp H-P, Pleskacheva MG, Gossweiler H, Ricceri L, Smirnova AA, Garin NN, et al. A large outdoor radial maze for comparative studies in birds and mammals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001; 25:83-99. PMID: 11166080
3. Lihoreau M, Raine NE, Reynolds AM, Stelzer RJ, Lim KS, Smith AD, et al. Unravelling the mechanisms of trapline foraging in bees. Comm Integr Biol. 2013; 6: e22701.
4. Marshall RES, Hurly TA, Healy SD. Do a flower's features help hummingbirds to learn its contents and refill rate? Anim Behav. 2012; 83:1163-1169.
5. Nachev V, Winter DG. The psychophysics of uneconomical choice: non-linear reward evaluation by a nectar feeder. Anim Cogn.2012; 15:393-400. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0465-7 PMID: 22045545
6. Isden J, Panayi C, Dingle C, Madden J. Performance in cognitive and problem-solving tasks in male spotted bowerbirds does not correlate with mating success. Anim Behav. 2013; 86:829-838.
7. Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10:434-445. doi: 10.1038/nrn2639 PMID: 19401723
8. Toxopeus IB, Sterck EHM, Hooff JARAMv, Spruijt BM, Heeren TJ. Effects of trait anxiety on performance of socially housed monkeys in a learning test. Behaviour. 2005; 142:1269-1287.
9. Galef BG. Approaches to the study of traditional behaviors of free-living animals. Learn Behav. 2004; 32:53-61. PMID: 15161140
10. Kendal RL, Galef BG, Schaik CPV. Social learning research outside the laboratory: How and why? Learn Behav. 2010; 38:187-194. doi: 10.3758/LB.38.3.187 PMID: 20628158
11. Webster SJ, Lefebvre L. Problem solving and neophobia in a columbiform-passeriform assemblage in Barbados. Anim Behav. 2001; 62:23-32.
12. Morand-Ferron J, Lefebvre L, Reader SM, Sol D, Elvin S. Dunking behaviour in Carib grackles. Anim Behav. 200468:1267-1274.
13. Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Rawles JEC, Quinn JL. Who are the innovators? A field experiment with two passerine species. Behav Ecol. 2011; 22:1241-1248.
14. Benson-Amram S, Weldele ML, Holekamp KE. A comparison of innovative problem-solving abilities between wild and captive spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Anim Behav. 2013; 85:349-356.
15. Papini MR. Pattern and process in the evolution of learning. Psychol Rev. 2002; 109:186-201. PMID: 11863037
16. Ginsburg S, Jablonka E. The evolution of associative learning: a factor in the Cambrian explosion. J Theor Biol. 2010; 266:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.06.017 PMID: 20558182
17. Greenlees MJ, Phillips BL, Shine R. Adjusting to a toxic invader: native Australian frogs learn not to prey on cane toads. Behav Ecol. 2010; 21:966-971.
18. Marzluff JM, Walls J, Cornell HN, Withey JC, Craig DP. Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows. Anim Behav. 2010; 79:699-707.
19. Ferrari MCO, Chivers DP. Learning about non-predators and safe places: the forgotten elements of risk assessment. Anim Cogn. 2011; 14:309-316. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0363-4 PMID: 21203793
20. Hollis KL, Cadieux EL, Colbert MM. The biological function of pavlovian conditioning: a mechanism for mating success in the blue gourami (Trichogaster trichopterus). J Comp Psychol. 1989; 103:115-121.
21. Paur J, Gray DA. Individual consistency, learning and memory in a parasitoid fly, Ormia ochracea. Anim Behav. 2011; 82:825-830.
22. Dickinson A. Associative learning and animal cognition. Phil Trans Roy Soc B. 2012; 367:2733-2742.
23. Heyes C. Simple minds: a qualified defence of associative learning. Phil Trans Roy Soc B. 2012; 367:2695-2703.
24. Hurly TA, Healy SD. Memory for flowers in rufous hummingbirds: location or local visual cues? Anim Behav. 1996; 51: 1149-1157.
25. Lihoreau M, Raine NE, Reynolds AM, Stelzer RJ, Lim KS, Smith AD, et al. Radar tracking and motionsensitive cameras on flowers reveal the development of pollinator multi-destination routes over large spatial scales. PLoS Biol. 2012; 10:e1001392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392 PMID: 23049479
26. Boogert NJ, Monceau K, Lefebvre L. A field test of behavioural flexibility in Zenaida doves (Zenaida aurita). Behav Proc. 2010; 85:135-141.
27. Schwarz S, Cheng K. Visual associative learning in two desert ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2010; 64:2033-2041.
28. Skinner BF. Drive and reflex strength: II. J Gen Psychol. 1932; 6:38-48.
29. Steurer MM, Aust U, Huber L. The Vienna comparative cognition technology (VCCT): an innovative operant conditioning system for various species and experimental procedures. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 44:909-918. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0198-9 PMID: 22437512
30. Morgan MM, Fitch MD, Holman JG, Lea SEG. Pigeons learn the concept of an "A". Perception. 1976; 5:57-66. PMID: 958849
31. Baum WM. Choice in free-ranging wild pigeons. Science. 1974; 185:78-79. PMID: 17779288
32. Drea CM, Wallen K. Low-status monkeys "play dumb" when learning in mixed social groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999; 96:12965-12969. PMID: 10536031
33. Fagot J, Bonté E. Automated testing of cognitive performance in monkeys: use of a battery of computerized test systems by a troop of semi-free-ranging baboons (Papio papio). Behav Res Methods. 2010; 42:507-516. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.507 PMID: 20479182
34. Hoffman AM, Song J, Tuttle EM. ELOPTA: a novel microcontroller-based operant device. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39:776-782. PMID: 18183890
35. Healy SD. Memory for objects and positions: delayed non-matching-to-sample in storing and non-storing tits. Q J Exp Psychol. 1995; 48:179-191.
36. Wilson DS, Coleman K, Clark AB, Biederman L. Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): an ecological study of a psychological trait. J Comp Psychol. 1993; 107:250-260.
37. Biro PA, Dingemanse NJ. Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. TREE. 2009; 24:66-67. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.001 PMID: 19110338
38. Stuber EF, Araya-Ajoy YG, Mathot KJ, Mutzel A, Nicolaus M, Wijmenga JJ, et al. Slow explorers take less risk: a problem of sampling bias in ecological studies. Behav Ecol. 2013; 24:1092-1098.
39. Verbeek MEM, Drent PJ, Wiepkema PR. Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behavior of male great tits. Anim Behav. 1994; 48:1113-1121.
40. Quinn JL, Cole EF, Bates J, Payne RW, CresswellW. Personality predicts individual responsiveness to the risks of starvation and predation. Proc Roy Soc B. 2012; 279:1919-1926.
41. Groothuis TGG, Carere C. Avian personalities: characterization and epigenesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 29:137-150. PMID: 15652261
42. Thornton A, Lukas D. Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Phil Trans Roy Soc B. 2012; 367:2773-2783.
43. Reader SM. Innovation and social learning: individual variation and brain evolution. Anim Biol. 2003; 53:147-158.
44. Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Quinn JL. Studying the evolutionary ecology of cognition in the wild: a review of practical and conceptual challenges. Biol Rev. 2015;doi: 10.1111/brv.12174
45. Rowe C, Healy SD. Measuring variation in cognition. Behav Ecol. 2014; 25:1287-1292.
46. Roth TC, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV. Learning capabilities enhanced in harsh environments: a common garden approach. Proc Roy Soc B. 2010; 277:3187-3193.
47. Guillette LM, Reddon AR, Hurd PL, Sturdy CB. Exploration of a novel space is associated with individual differences in learning speed in black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. Behav Proc. 2009; 82:265-270.
48. Ings TC, Raine NE, Chittka L. A population comparison of the strength and persistence of innate colour preference and learning speed in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009; 63:1207-1218.
49. Titulaer M, van Oers K, Naguib M. Personality affects learning performance in difficult tasks in a sexdependent way. Anim Behav. 2012; 83:723-730.
50. Raine NE, Chittka L. The correlation of learning speed and natural foraging success in bumble-bees. Proc Roy Soc B. 2008; 275:803-808.
51. Cole EF, Cram DL, Quinn JL. Individual variation in spontaneous problem-solving performance among wild great tits. Anim Behav. 2011; 81:491-498.
52. Cole EF, Morand-Ferron J, Hinks A, Quinn JL. Cognitive ability influences reproductive life history variation in the wild. Curr Biol. 2012; 22:1808-1812. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.051 PMID: 22940473
53. Quinn JL, Cole EF, Morand-Ferron J. Studying microevolutionary processes in cognitive traits: a comment on Rowe and Healy. Behav Ecol. 2014; 25:1297-1298.
54. Marchetti C, Drent PJ. Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits. Anim Behav. 2000; 60:131-140. PMID: 10924212
55. Guenther A, Brust V, Dersen M, Trillmich F. Learning and personality types are related in cavies (Cavia aperea). J Comp Psychol. 2014; 128:74-81. doi: 10.1037/a0033678 PMID: 24127657
56. Bonter DN, Bridge ES. Applications of radio frequency identification (RFID) in ornithological research: a review. J Field Ornithol. 2011; 82:1-10.
57. Krause J, Krause S, Arlinghaus R, Psorakis I, Roberts S, Rutz C. Reality mining of animal social systems. TREE. 2013; 28:541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.06.002 PMID: 23856617
58. Svensson L. Identification guide to European passerines. Thetford: British Trust for Ornithology. 1992.
59. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Cockburn A, Sheldon BC. Individual personalities and social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). Ecol Lett. 2013; 16:1365-1372. doi: 10.1111/ele.12181 PMID: 24047530
60. Psorakis I, Roberts SJ, Rezek I, Sheldon BC. Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams. J Roy Soc Interface. 2012; 9:3055-3066.
61. Farine DR, Garroway CJ, Sheldon BC. Social network analysis of mixed-species flocks: exploring the structure and evolution of interspecific social behaviour. Anim Behav. 2012; 84:1271-1277.
62. Matechou E, Cheng SC, Kidd L, Garroway CJ. Reproductive consequences of the timing of seasonal movements in a non-migratory wild bird population. Ecology. 2015; 96:1641-1649.
63. Quinn JL, Patrick SC, Bouwhuis S, Wilkin TA, Sheldon BC. Heterogeneous selection on a heritable temperament trait in a variable environment. J Anim Ecol. 2009; 78:1203-1215. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2656.2009.01585.x PMID: 19558612
64. Patrick SC, Chapman JR, Dugdale HL, Quinn JL, Sheldon BC. Promiscuity, paternity and personality in the great tit. Proc Roy Soc B. 2011; 279:1724-1730.
65. Cole EF, Quinn JL. Shy birds play it safe: personality in captivity predicts risk responsiveness during reproduction in the wild. Biol Lett. 2014; 10:20140178. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0178 PMID: 24829251
66. Quinn JL, Cole EF, Patrick S, Sheldon BC. State and scale dependent links between personality and dispersal. J Anim Ecol. 2011; 80:918-928. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01835.x PMID: 21488872
67. Cole EF, Quinn JL. Personality and problem-solving explain competitive ability in the wild. Proc Roy Soc B. 2012; 279:1168-1175
68. Ham AD, Ihalainen E, Lindström L, Mappes J. Does colour matter? The importance of colour in avoidance learning, memorability and generalisation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006; 60:482-491.
69. Svádová K, Exnerová A, Štys P, Landová E, Valenta J, Fučíiková A, et al. Role of different colours of aposematic insects in learning, memory and generalization of naive bird predators. Anim Behav. 2009; 77:327-336.
70. Schuler W, Roper TJ. Responses to warning coloration in avian predators. Adv Study Behav. 1992; 21:111-146.
71. Gosler AG. The great tit. London: Hamlyn. 1993.
72. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. TREE. 2008; 24:127-135.
73. Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W. Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behav Ecol. 2009; 20:416-420. PMID: 19461866
74. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer. 2000.
75. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. 2015.
76. Perrins CM. British tits. London: Collins. 1979.
77. Biondi LM, Bó MS, Vassallo AI. Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem- solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango). Anim Cogn. 2010; 13:701-710.doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0319-8 PMID: 20300791
78. Overington SE, Cauchard L, Côté K-A, Lefebvre L. Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: what characterizes an innovator? Behav Proc. 2011; 87:274-285.
79. Boogert NJ, Reader SM, Hoppitt W, Laland KN. The origin and spread of innovations in starlings. Anim Behav. 2008; 75:1509-1518.
80. Griffin AS, Guez D, Lermite F, Patience M. Tracking changing environments: innovators are fast, but not flexible learners. PLos ONE. 2013; 8:e84907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084907 PMID: 24391981
81. Bonté E, Kemp C, Fagot J. Age effects on transfer index performance and executive control in baboons (Papio papio). Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1-7.
82. Morand-Ferron J, Quinn JL. Larger groups are more efficient problem-solvers in the wild. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:15898-15903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111560108 PMID: 21930936
83. Galef BG, Giraldeau LA. Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim Behav. 2001; 61:3-15. PMID: 11170692
84. Hoppitt W, Laland KN. Social processes influencing learning in animals: a review of the evidence. Adv Study Behav. 2008; 38:105-165.
85. Sasvári L. Great tits benefit from feeding in mixed-species flocks: a field experiment. Anim Behav. 1992; 43:289-296.
86. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Sheldon BC. Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds. Proc Roy Soc B. 2012; 279:4199-4205.
87. Aplin LM, Sheldon BC, Morand-Ferron J. Milk-bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus. Anim Behav. 2013; 85:1225-1232.
88. Sasvári L. Observational learning in great, blue and marsh tits. Anim Behav. 1979; 27:767-771.
89. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cockburn A, Thornton A, Sheldon BC. Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature. 2014; 518:538-541. doi: 10.1038/nature13998 PMID: 25470065
90. Boisvert MJ, Sherry DF. A system for the automated recording of feeding behavior and body weight. Physiol Behav. 2000; 71:147-151. PMID: 11134696
91. Bond AB, Kamil AC, Balda RP. Serial reversal learning and the evolution of behavioral flexibility in three species of North American corvids (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus, Nucifraga columbiana, Aphelocoma californica). J Comp Psychol. 2007; 121:372-379. PMID: 18085920