The psychophysics of uneconomical choice: Non-linear reward evaluation by a nectar feeder

Animal Cognition

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 393-400

  Nachev, Vladislav ^a,b   Winter, York ^a,b  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bat; Nectarivory; Psychometric function; Uneconomical choice

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAT; DECISION MAKING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; NECTAR; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REWARD;

ANIMALS; CHIROPTERA; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEEDING BEHAVIOR; JUDGMENT; PLANT NECTAR; REWARD;

ANIMALIA; GLOSSOPHAGA COMMISSARISI;

EID: 84859721643     PISSN: 14359448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0465-7     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baker HG, Baker I (1983) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 117-141.
2. Baker HG, Baker I, Hodges SA (1998) Sugar composition of nectars and fruits consumed by birds and bats in the tropics and subtropics. Biotropica 30: 559-586.
3. Bateson M, Healy SD, Hurly TA (2003) Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds. Proc Roy Soc B 270: 1271-1276.
4. Bolten AB, Feinsinger P, Baker HG, Baker I (1979) On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar. Oecologia 41: 301-304.
5. Cnaani J, Thomson JD, Papaj DR (2006) Flower choice and learning in foraging bumblebees: effects of variation in nectar volume and concentration. Ethology 112: 278-285.
6. Deco G, Rolls ET (2006) Decision-making and Weber's law: a neurophysiological model. Eur J Neurosci 24: 901-916.
7. Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL (1976) Nectar characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds. Oecologia 25: 101-113.
8. Isler K, van Schaik CP (2006) Metabolic costs of brain size evolution. Biol Lett 2: 557-560.
9. Kacelnik A, Brito e Abreu F (1998) Risky choice and Weber's law. J Theor Biol 194: 289-298.
10. Kang J, Wu J, Smerieri A, Feng J (2010) Weber's law implies neural discharge more regular than a Poisson process. Eur J Neurosci 31: 1006-1018.
11. Kuss M, Jäkel F, Wichmann FA (2005) Bayesian inference for psychometric functions. J Vision 5: 478-492.
12. Livnat A, Pippenger N (2008) Systematic mistakes are likely in bounded optimal decision-making systems. J Theor Biol 250: 410-423.
13. Nicolson SW, Fleming PA (2003) Nectar as food for birds: the physiological consequences of drinking dilute sugar solutions. Plant Syst Evol 238: 139-153.
14. Niven JE, Laughlin SB (2008) Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J Exp Biol 211: 1792-1804.
15. Niven JE, Anderson JC, Laughlin SB (2007) Fly photoreceptors demonstrate energy-information trade-offs in neural coding. PLoS Biol 5: e116.
16. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
17. Real LA, Rathcke BJ (1991) Individual variation in nectar production and its effect on fitness in Kalmia latifolia. Ecology 72: 149-155.
18. Roberts MW (1996) Hummingbirds' nectar concentration preferences at low volume: the importance of time scale. Anim Behav 52: 361-370.
19. Roces F, Winter Y, von Helversen O (1993) Concentration preference and water balance in a flower visiting bat, Glossophaga soricinaantillarum. In: Barthlott W, Naumann CM, Schmidt-Loske K, Schuchmann K (eds) Animal-plant Interactions in tropical environments. Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, pp 159-165.
20. Rodríguez-Peña N, Stoner KE, Schondube JE, Ayala-Berdón J, Flores-Ortiz CM, Martínez del Río C (2007) Effects of sugar composition and concentration on food selection by Saussure's long-nosed bat (Leptonycteriscurasoae) and the long-tongued bat (Glossophaga soricina). J Mammal 88: 1466-1474.
21. Sakai S (1993) A model for nectar secretion in animal-pollinated plants. Evol Ecol 7: 394-400.
22. Santoso A, Kaiser A, Winter Y (2006) Individually dosed oral drug administration to socially-living transponder-tagged mice by a water dispenser under RFID control. J Neurosci Meth 153: 208-213.
23. Stiles FG, Freeman CE (1993) Patterns in floral nectar characteristics of some bird-visited plant species from Costa Rica. Biotropica 25: 191-205.
24. Thiele J (2006) Nahrungssuchstrategien der nektarivoren Fledermaus Glossophaga commissarisi (Phyllostomidae) im Freiland-eine individuenbasierte Verhaltensstudie unter Verwendung von Transpondertechnik. Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich.
25. Toelch U, Winter Y (2007) Psychometric function for nectar volume perception of a flower-visiting bat. J Comp Physiol A 193(2): 265-269.
26. Treutwein B, Strasburger H (1999) Fitting the psychometric function. Percept Psychophys 61: 87-106.
27. Tschapka M (1998) Koexistenz und Ressourcennutzung in einer Artengemeinschaft von Blumenfledermäusen (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) im atlantischen Tieflandregenwald Costa Ricas. Dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
28. Tschapka M, von Helversen O (2007) Phenology, nectar production and visitation behaviour of bats on the flowers of the bromeliad Werauhiagladioliflora in a Costa Rican lowland rain forest. J Trop Eco 23: 385-395.
29. von Frisch K (1927) Versuche über den Geschmackssinn der Bienen. Naturwissenschaften 15: 321-327.
30. von Helversen O, Winkler L, Bestmann HJ (2000) Sulphur-containing "perfumes" attract flower-visiting bats. J Comp Physiol A 186: 143-153.
31. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001) The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63: 1293-1313.
32. Winter Y, Stich KP (2005) Foraging in a complex naturalistic environment: capacity of spatial working memory in flower bats. J Exp Biol 208: 539-548.
33. Zimmerman M (1983) Plant reproduction and optimal foraging: experimental nectar manipulations in Delphinium nelsonii. Oikos 41: 57-63.