Mini-fluid challenge predicts fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing under spinal anaesthesia: An observational study

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 645-649

  Guinot, Pierre Grégoire ^a   Bernard, Eugenie ^a   Defrancq, Fanny ^a   Petiot, Sandra ^a   Majoub, Yazine ^a   Dupont, Herve ^a   Lorne, Emmanuel ^a  

^a AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEVOBUPIVACAINE; CRYSTALLOID; ISOTONIC SOLUTION;

AGED; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BREATHING MECHANICS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CRYSTALLOID; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE OXIMETRY; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TREATMENT RESPONSE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; BREATHING; DRUG EFFECTS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT MONITORING; PROCEDURES; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATION;

EID: 84942589153     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000175     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:820-826.
2. Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BJM 1997; 315:909-912.
3. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398.
4. Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, et al. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:678-684.
5. Madger S. Fluid status and fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16:289-296.
6. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, et al. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:395-401.
7. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:1475-1483.
8. Vallée F, Fourcarde O, DeSoyres O, et al. Stroke output variations calculated by esophageal Doppler is a reliable predictor of fluid response. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:1388-1393.
9. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, et al. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 min can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 2011; 115:541-547.
10. Van de Water JM, Miller TW, Vogel RL, et al. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology? Chest 2003; 123:2028-2033.
11. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al., STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007; 335:806-808.
12. Guinot PG, Urbina B, de Broca B, et al. Predictability of the respiratory variation of stroke volume varies according to the definition of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112:580-581.
13. Guinot PG, de Broca B, Abou Arab O, et al. Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110:28-33.
14. Verheij J, van Lingen A, Beishuizen A, et al. Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:1030-1038.
15. Buttermorth JF, Austin JC, Johnson MD, et al. Effect of total spinal anesthesia on arterial and venous responses to dopamine and dobutamine. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:209-214.
16. Sheskey MC, Rocco AG, Bizzari-Schmid M, et al. A dose-response study of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1983; 62:931-935.
17. Racle JP, Poy JY, Haberer JP, Benkhadra A. A comparison of cardiovascular responses of normotensive and hypertensive elderly patients following bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth 1989; 14:66-71.
18. Taivainen T, Tuominen M, Rosenberg PH. Influence of obesity on the spread of spinal analgesia after injection of plain 0.5% bupivacaine at the L3-4 or L4-5 interspace. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64:542-546.
19. Jackson R, Reid JA, Thorburn J. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75:262-265.
20. Mercier FJ. Fluid loading for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: have we studied all the options? Anesth Analg 2011; 113:677-680.
21. Langesæter E. Is it more informative to focus on cardiac output than blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in women with severe preeclampsia? Anesthesiology 2008; 108:771-772.
22. Kim JY, Kim BR, Lee KH, et al. Comparison of cardiac output derived from FloTrac/Vigileo and impedance cardiography during major abdominal surgery. J Int Med Res 2013; 41:1342-1349.
23. Lorne E, Mahjoub Y, Diouf M, et al. Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with esophageal Doppler. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113:596-602.