Digital process for an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 469-473

  Brandt, Jan ^a   Lauer, Hans Christoph ^a   Peter, Thorsten ^a   Brandt, Silvia ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL;

AGED; CASE REPORT; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; HUMAN; MALE; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

AGED; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; HUMANS; MALE; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84942513507     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: 10976841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. E. Anadioti, S.A. Aquilino, D.G. Gratton, J.A. Holloway, I.L. Denry, G.W. Thomas, and et al. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions J Prosthodont 113 2015 304 309
2. K.B. Kim, J.H. Kim, W.C. Kim, and J.H. Kim Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies J Prosthet Dent 112 2014 1432 1436
3. J. Ng, D. Ruse, and C. Wyatt A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods J Prosthet Dent 112 2014 555 560
4. F. Beuer, J. Schweiger, and D. Edelhoff Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations Br Dent J 204 2008 505 511
5. S.J. Lee, and G.O. Gallucci Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes Clin Oral Implants Res 24 2013 111 115
6. W.S. Lin, B.T. Harris, and D. Morton The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone J Prosthet Dent 109 2013 187 191
7. R. van Noort The future of dental devices is digital Dent Mater 28 2012 3 12
8. T. Joda, and U. Bragger Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis Clin Oral Implants Res 2 Sep 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12476 [Epub ahead of print]
9. D. Wismeijer, R. Mans, M. van Genuchten, and H.A. Reijers Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants Clin Oral Implants Res 25 2014 1113 1118
10. A. Ender, and A. Mehl Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study Int J Comput Dent 14 2011 11 21
11. C.Y. Lee, N. Wong, S.D. Ganz, J. Mursic, and J.B. Suzuki Use of an intraoral laser scanner during the prosthetic phase of implant dentistry: a pilot study J Oral Implantol 41 2015 e126 e132
12. H. Tamim, H. Skjerven, A. Ekfeldt, and H.J. Ronold Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions Int J Prosthodont 27 2014 331 337
13. C.D. Ramsey, and R.G. Ritter Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations J Esthet Restor Dent 24 2012 299 308
14. W.J. van der Meer, F.S. Andriessen, D. Wismeijer, and Y. Ren Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology PloS One 7 2012 e43312
15. A.M. Renner Fabrication of implant overdentures that are passive and biocompatible Implant Dent 9 2000 96 101
16. G. Thalji, M. Bryington, I.J. De Kok, and L.F. Cooper Prosthodontic management of implant therapy Dent Clin North Am 58 2014 207 225
17. R. Mericske-Stern Prosthetic considerations Aust Dent J 53 2008 S49 59
18. D. Locker, J. Maggirias, and C. Quinonez Income, dental insurance coverage, and financial barriers to dental care among Canadian adults J Public Health Dent 71 2011 327 334
19. B. Gimenez, M. Ozcan, F. Martinez-Rus, and G. Pradies Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17 2015 e54 e64
20. B. Gimenez, G. Pradies, F. Martinez-Rus, and M. Ozcan Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30 2015 56 64
21. T. Joda, and U. Bragger Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns Clin Oral Implants Res 25 2014 1304 1306
22. T.R. McDonald Commentary. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations J Esthet Restor Dent 24 2012 309
23. R.G. Nedelcu, and A.S. Persson Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis J Prosthet Dent 112 2014 1461 1471
24. S.B. Patzelt, S. Bishti, S. Stampf, and W. Att Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data J Am Dent Assoc 145 2014 1133 1140
25. S.B. Patzelt, C. Lamprinos, S. Stampf, and W. Att The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study J Am Dent Assoc 145 2014 542 551
26. A. Kutkut, O. Abu-Hammad, and R. Mitchell Esthetic considerations for reconstructing implant emergence profile using titanium and zirconia custom implant abutments: fifty case series report J Oral Implantol 31 Oct 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00274 [Epub ahead of print]