Coordinated vigilance provides evidence for direct reciprocity in coral reef fishes

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Brandl, Simon J ^a   Bellwood, David R ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; CORAL REEF; ECOSYSTEM; FISH; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CORAL REEFS; ECOSYSTEM; FISHES; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84942333251     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep14556     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Dugatkin, L. A. Cooperation Among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
2. Trivers, R. L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35-57 (1971).
3. Mesterton-Gibbons M. & Dugatkin, L. A. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: evolutionary factors. Quart. Rev. Biol. 67, 267-281 (1992).
4. Dugatkin, L. A. & Mesterton-Gibbons M. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: reciprocal altruism, by-product mutualism and group selection in fishes. BioSystems 37, 19-30 (1996).
5. Nowak, M. A. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560-1563 (2006).
6. Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. D. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211, 1390-1396 (1981).
7. Schino, G. & Aureli, F. A few misunderstandings about reciprocal altruism. Commun. Integr. Biol. 3, 561-563 (2010).
8. Ghoul, M., Griffin, A. S. & West, S. A. Towards an evolutionary definition of cheating. Evolution 68, 318-331 (2014).
9. Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature 355, 250-253 (1992).
10. Zöttl, M., Heg, D., Chervet, N. & Taborsky, M. Kinship reduces alloparental care in cooperative cichlids where helpers pay-to-stay. Nat. Commun. 4, 1341 (2013).
11. Taborsky, M. Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Anim. Behav. 32, 1236-1252 (1984).
12. Fischer, E. A. Simultaneous hermaphroditism, tit-for-tat, and the evolutionary stability of social systems. Ethol. Sociobiol. 9, 119-136 (1988).
13. Milinski, M., Pfluger, D., Külling, D. & Kettler, R. Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 17-21 (1990).
14. Milinski, M. Tit for tat in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature 325, 433-435 (1987).
15. Godard, R. Tit for tat among neighboring hooded warblers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33, 45-50 (1993).
16. Krama, T. et al. You mob my owl, I'll mob yours: birds play tit-for-tat game. Sci. Rep. 2, 800 (2012).
17. Krams, I., Krama, T., Igaune, K. & Mänd, R. Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 599-605 (2008).
18. Carter, G. G. & Wilkinson, G. S. Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 280, 20122573 (2013).
19. Wilkinson, G. S. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature 308, 181-184 (1984).
20. Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. The influence of social experience on cooperative behaviour of rats (Rattus norvegicus): direct vs generalised reciprocity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 499-505 (2008).
21. Cheney, D. L., Moscovice, L. R., Heesen, M., Mundry, R. & Seyfarth, R. M. Contingent cooperation between wild female baboons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9562-9566 (2010).
22. Hauser, M. D., Chen, M. K., Chen, F. & Chuang, E. Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270, 2363-2370 (2003).
23. Clutton-Brock, T. H. Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature 462, 51-57 (2009).
24. Stevens, J. R. & Hauser, M. D. Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 60-65 (2004).
25. Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M. & Bonhoeffer, S. Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 272, 1115-1120 (2005).
26. Clements, K. C. & Stephens, D. W. Testing models of non-kin cooperation: mutualism and the Prisoner's Dilemma. Anim. Behav. 50, 527-535 (1995).
27. Milinski, M. & Wedekind, C. Working memory constrains human cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13755-13758 (1998).
28. Russell, A. F. & Wright, J. Avian mobbing: byproduct mutualism not reciprocal altruism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 3-5 (2009).
29. Connor, R. C. Cooperation beyond the dyad: on simple models and a complex society. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 365, 2687-2697 (2010).
30. Melis, A. P. & Semmann, D. How is human cooperation different? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 365, 2663-2674 (2010).
31. Taborsky, M. Social evolution: reciprocity there is. Curr. Biol. 23, 486-488 (2013).
32. Raihani, N. J. & Bshary, R. Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1628-1639, (2011).
33. Brosnan, S. F., Salwiczek, L. & Bshary, R. The interplay of cognition and cooperation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 365, 2699-2710 (2010).
34. Connor, R. C. Altruism among non-relatives: alternatives to the 'Prisoner's Dilemma'. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 84-86 (1995).
35. Noë, R. Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together. Anim. Behav. 71, 1-18 (2006).
36. Van Doorn, G. S., Riebli, T. & Taborsky, M. Coaction versus reciprocity in continuous-time models of cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 356, 1-10 (2014).
37. Sirot, E. Negotiation may lead selfish individuals to cooperate: the example of the collective vigilance game. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 279, 2862-2867 (2012).
38. Carter, G. The reciprocity controversy. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 1, 368-386 (2014).
39. Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 78, 547-573 (1989).
40. Fischer, E. A. Egg trading in the chalk bass, Serranus tortugarum, a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Z. Tierpsych. 66, 143-151 (1984).
41. Bergmüller, R. & Taborsky, M. Experimental manipulation of helping in a cooperative breeder: helpers 'pay to stay'by preemptive appeasement. Anim. Behav. 69, 19-28 (2005).
42. Bergmüller, R., Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 272, 325-331 (2005).
43. Bshary, R. & Grutter, A. S. Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature 441, 975-978 (2006).
44. Bshary, R. & Schäffer, D. Choosy reef fish select cleaner fish that provide high-quality service. Anim. Behav. 63, 557-564 (2002).
45. Dugatkin, L. A. & Alfieri, M. Tit-for-tat in guppies (Poecilia reticulata): the relative nature of cooperation and defection during predator inspection. Evol. Ecol. 5, 300-309 (1991).
46. Connor, R. C. Partner preferences in by-product mutualisms and the case of predator inspection in fish. Anim. Behav. 51, 451-454 (1996).
47. Connor, R. C. Egg-trading in simultaneous hermaphrodites: an alternative to Tit-for-Tat. J. Evol. Biol. 5, 523-528 (1992).
48. Stephens, D. W., Anderson, J. P. & Benson, K. E. On the spurious occurrence of Tit for Tat in pairs of predator-approaching fish. Anim. Behav. 53, 113-131 (1997).
49. Bshary, R., Gingins, S. & Vail, A. L. Social cognition in fishes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 465-471 (2014).
50. Bshary, R., Wickler, W. & Fricke, H. Fish cognition: a primate's eye view. Anim. Cogn. 5, 1-13 (2002).
51. Brown, C. Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics. Anim. Cogn. 18, 1-17 (2015).
52. Brown, C., Laland K. & Krause, J. Fish cognition and behavior. (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK).
53. Ward, A. J. W., Sumpter, D. J., Couzin, I. D., Hart, P. J. & Krause, J. Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6948-6953 (2008).
54. Ward, A. J. W., Herbert-Read, J. E., Sumpter, D. J., Krause, J. Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2312-2315 (2011).
55. Bshary, R. & Grutter, A. S. Punishment and partner switching cause cooperative behaviour in a cleaning mutualism. Biol. Lett. 1, 396-399 (2005).
56. Croft, D. et al. Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59, 644-650 (2006).
57. Woodland, D. J. Revision of the fish family Siganidae with descriptions of two new species and comments on distribution and biology. (Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI) (1990).
58. Brandl, S. J. & Bellwood, D. R. Pair formation in the herbivorous rabbitfish Siganus doliatus. J. Fish Biol. 82, 2031-2044 (2013).
59. Brandl, S. J. & Bellwood, D. R. Morphology, sociality, and ecology: can morphology predict pairing behavior in coral reef fishes? Coral Reefs 32, 835-846 (2013).
60. Brandl, S. J. & Bellwood, D. R. Pair formation in coral reef fishes: an ecological perspective. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 52, 1-80 (2014).
61. Brandl, S. J. & Bellwood, D. R. Individual-based analyses reveal limited functional overlap in a coral reef fish community. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 661-670 (2014).
62. Fox, R. J. & Donelson, J. M. Rabbitfish sentinels: first report of coordinated vigilance in conspecific marine fishes. Coral Reefs 33, 253-253 (2014).
63. Hoey, A. S., Brandl, S. J. & Bellwood, D. R. Diet and cross-shelf distribution of rabbitfishes (f. Siganidae) on the northern Great Barrier Reef: implications for ecosystem function. Coral Reefs 32, 973-984 (2013).
64. Beukers, J. S. & Jones, G. P. Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population. Oecologia 114, 50-59 (1998).
65. Brown, G. E., Godin, J.-G. J. & Pedersen, J. Fin-flicking behaviour: a visual antipredator alarm signal in a characin fish. Hemigrammus erythrozonus. Anim. Behav. 58, 469-475 (1999).
66. Tricas, T. C., Kajiura, S. M. & Kosaki, R. K. Acoustic communication in territorial butterflyfishes: test of the sound production hypothesis. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 4994-5004 (2006).
67. Parmentier, E., Boyle, K. S., Berten, L., Brié, C. & Lecchini, D. 2011. Sound production and mechanism on Heniochus chrysostomus (Chaetodontidae). J. Exp. Biol. 214, 2702-2708.
68. Murphy, K. E. & Pitcher, T. J. Predator attack motivation influences the inspection behaviour of European minnows. J. Fish Biol. 50, 407-417 (1987).
69. Hastie, T. J. & Tibshirani, R. J. Generalized Additive Models (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1990).
70. Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. (Springer, 2009).
71. Pink, J. & Fulton, C. Right tools for the task: intraspecific modality in the swimming behaviour of coral reef fishes. Mar. Biol. 161, 1103-1111 (2014).
72. Radford, A. N., Hollén, L. I. & Bell, M. B. The higher the better: sentinel height influences foraging success in a social bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 276, 2437-2442 (2009).
73. McGowan, K. J. & Woolfenden, G. E. A sentinel system in the Florida scrub jay. Anim. Behav. 37, 1000-1006 (1989).
74. Favreau, F.-R., Goldizen, A. W. & Pays, O. Interactions among social monitoring, anti-predator vigilance and group size in eastern grey kangaroos. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. rspb20092337 (2010).
75. Pays, O., Dubot, A.-L., Jarman, P. J., Loisel, P. & Goldizen, A. W. Vigilance and its complex synchrony in the red-necked pademelon, Thylogale thetis. Behav. Ecol. 20, 22-29 (2009).
76. Fernández-Juricic, E., Erichsen, J. T. & Kacelnik, A. Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 25-31 (2004).
77. Arenz, C. L. & Leger, D. W. The antipredator vigilance of adult and juvenile thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Sciuridae: Spermophilus tridecemlineatus): visual obstruction and simulated hawk attacks. Ethology 103, 945-953 (1997).
78. Fernández-Juricic, E., Smith, R. & Kacelnik, A. Increasing the costs of conspecific scanning in socially foraging starlings affects vigilance and foraging behaviour. Anim. Behav. 69, 73-81 (2005).
79. Hollén, L. I., Bell, M. B. & Radford, A. N. Cooperative sentinel calling? Foragers gain increased biomass intake. Curr. Biol. 18, 576-579 (2008).
80. Wickler, W. Coordination of vigilance in bird groups. The "Watchman's Song" Hypothesis. Z. Tierpsychol. 69, 250-253 (1985).
81. Manser, M. B. Response of foraging group members to sentinel calls in suricates, Suricata suricatta. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266, 1013-1019 (1999).
82. Bull, C. M. & Pamula, Y. Enhanced vigilance in monogamous pairs of the lizard. Tiliqua rugosa. Behav. Ecol. 9, 452-455 (1998).
83. Annett, C. A., Pierotti, R. & Baylis, J. R. Male and female parental roles in the monogamous cichlid, Tilapia mariae, introduced in Florida. Env. Biol. Fish. 54, 283-293 (1999).
84. Bednekoff, P. A. Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. Am. Nat. 150, 373-392 (1997).
85. Wright, J., Berg, E., De Kort, S., Khazin, V. & Maklakov, A. A. Safe selfish sentinels in a cooperative bird. J. Anim. Ecol. 70, 1070-1079 (2001).
86. Ridley, A. R., Nelson-Flower, M. J. & Thompson, A. M. Is sentinel behaviour safe? An experimental investigation. Anim. Behav. 85, 137-142 (2013).
87. Choat, J. H. & Clements, K. D. Vertebrate herbivores in marine and terrestrial environments: a nutritional ecology perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 375-403 (1998).
88. Sirot, E. & Touzalin, F. Coordination and synchronization of vigilance in groups of prey: the role of collective detection and predators' preference for stragglers. Am. Nat. 173, 47-59 (2009).
89. Clutton-Brock T. H., O'Riain M. J., Brotherton P. N. M., Gaynor D., Kansky R., Griffin A. S., Manser M. 1999. Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284, 1640-1644.
90. Choat, J. H., Clements, K. D. & Robbins, W. D. The trophic status of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. Mar. Biol. 140, 613-623 (2002).
91. De Waal, F. B. & Brosnan, S. F. Simple and complex reciprocity in primates. In Cooperation in primates and humans: mechanisms and evolution. eds Kappeler, P. M., van Schaik, C. P. pp. 85-105, Springer, Berlin (2006).
92. Roberts, G. Cooperation through interdependence. Anim. Behav. 70, 901-908 (2005).
93. St-Pierre, A., Larose, K. & Dubois, F. Long-term social bonds promote cooperation in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 276, 4223-4228 (2009).