Social cognition in fishes

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 465-471

  Bshary, Redouan ^a   Gingins, Simon ^a   Vail, Alexander L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behavior; Brain; Ecological approach; Fish; Physiology; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; FISH; PHYSIOLOGY;

BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE DEMANDS; COGNITIVE PROCESS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COMPLEX DECISION; ECOLOGICAL APPROACHES; RECENT RESEARCHES; SOCIAL COGNITION;

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONING; EVOLUTION; FISH; LEARNING; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VERTEBRATE; ANIMAL; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BRAIN; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; FISHES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84906780550     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Shettleworth S.J. Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior 2009, Oxford University Press.
2. Healy S.D., Rowe C. A critique of comparative studies of brain size. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:453-464.
3. Zuberbühler K., Byrne R.W. Social cognition. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:R786-R790.
4. Silk J.B., et al. The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:3099-3104.
5. Seyfarth R.M., Cheney D.L. Affiliation, empathy, and the origins of theory of mind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:10349-10356.
6. De Waal F.B.M. The antiquity of empathy. Science 2012, 336:874-876.
7. Brosnan S.F. Justice-and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:10416-10423.
8. Dunbar R.I.M., Shultz S. Evolution in the social brain. Science 2007, 317:1344-1347.
9. Chittka L., Niven J. Are bigger brains better?. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R995-R1008.
10. Bshary R., et al. How intelligent is Machiavellian behavior?. Animal Thinking: Contemporary Issues in Comparative Cognition 2011, 209-221. MIT Press. R. Menzel, J. Fisher (Eds.).
11. Shultz S., Dunbar R.I.M. Social bonds in birds are associated with brain size and contingent on the correlated evolution of life-history and increased parental investment. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 100:111-123.
12. Shultz S., Dunbar R.I.M. Species differences in executive function correlate with hippocampus volume and neocortex ratio across nonhuman primates. J. Comp. Psychol. 2010, 124:252-260.
13. Fish Cognition and Behavior 2011, John Wiley & Sons. 2nd edn. C. Brown (Ed.).
14. Jerison H. Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence 1973, Elsevier.
15. Goodson J.L. The vertebrate social behavior network: evolutionary themes and variations. Horm. Behav. 2005, 48:11-22.
16. O'Connell L.A., Hofmann H.A. Evolution of a vertebrate social decision-making network. Science 2012, 336:1154-1157.
17. Oliveira R.F. Mind the fish: zebrafish as a model in cognitive social neuroscience. Front. Neural Circuits 2013, 7:131.
18. O'Connell L.A., Hofmann H.A. The vertebrate mesolimbic reward system and social behavior network: a comparative synthesis. J. Comp. Neurol. 2011, 519:3599-3639.
19. Demski L.S. The pallium and mind/behavior relationships in teleost fishes. Brain Behav. Evol. 2013, 82:31-44.
20. Amo R., et al. Identification of the zebrafish ventral habenula as a homolog of the mammalian lateral habenula. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:1566-1574.
21. Hibi M., Shimizu T. Development of the cerebellum and cerebellar neural circuits. Dev. Neurobiol. 2012, 72:282-301.
22. Hutardo-Parrado C. Neuronal mechanisms of learning in teleost fish. Univ. Psychol. 2010, 9:663-678.
23. Arnott G., et al. Lateralization of lateral displays in convict cichlids. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7:683-685.
24. Moscicki M.K., et al. Lateralized behaviour of a non-social cichlid fish (Amatitlania nigrofasciata) in a social and a non-social environment. Behav. Processes 2011, 88:27-32.
25. Karenina K.A., et al. Eye as a key element of conspecific image eliciting lateralized response in fish. Anim. Cogn. 2012, 16:287-300.
26. Gonzalez-Voyer A., et al. Brain structure evolution in a basal vertebrate clade: evidence from phylogenetic comparative analysis of cichlid fishes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:238.
27. Shumway C.A. The evolution of complex brains and behaviors in African cichlid fishes. Curr. Zool. 2010, 56:144-156.
28. Pollen A.A., et al. Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in lake Tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav. Evol. 2007, 70:21-39.
29. Gonzalez-Voyer A., et al. Social fishes and single mothers: brain evolution in African cichlids. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:161-167.
30. Gonzalez-Voyer A., Kolm N. Sex, ecology and the brain: evolutionary correlates of brain structure volumes in Tanganyikan cichlids. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e14355.
31. Kubo D., et al. Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications. Proc. R. Soc. B 2013, 280:20130338.
32. Székely T., et al. Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution 2010, Cambridge University Press.
33. Kotrschal A., et al. Artificial selection on relative brain size in the guppy reveals costs and benefits of evolving a larger brain. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:168-171.
34. Maruska K.P., et al. Social descent with territory loss causes rapid behavioral, endocrine and transcriptional changes in the brain. J. Exp. Biol. 2013, 216:3656-3666.
35. Fernald R.D., Maruska K.P. Social information changes the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:17194-17199.
36. Huntingford F.A. The physiology of fish behaviour: a selective review of developments over the past 40 years. J. Fish Biol. 2012, 81:2103-2126.
37. Taborsky B., Oliveira R.F. Social competence: an evolutionary approach. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:679-688.
38. Gonda A., et al. Brain development and predation: plastic responses depend on evolutionary history. Biol. Lett. 2012, 8:249-252.
39. Ebbesson L.O.E., Braithwaite V.A. Environmental effects on fish neural plasticity and cognition. J. Fish Biol. 2012, 81:2151-2174.
40. Wismer S., et al. Variation in cleaner wrasse cooperation and cognition: influence of the developmental environment?. Ethology 2014, 120:519-531.
41. Kendal J.R., et al. Nine-spined sticklebacks deploy a hill-climbing social learning strategy. Behav. Ecol. 2009, 20:238-244.
42. Pike T.W., et al. Learning by proportional observation in a species of fish. Behav. Ecol. 2010, 21:570-575.
43. Pike T.W., Laland K.N. Conformist learning in nine-spined sticklebacks' foraging decisions. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6:466-468.
44. Webster M.M., Laland K.N. The learning mechanism underlying public information use in ninespine sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius). J. Comp. Psychol. 2013, 127:154-165.
45. Brown G.E., et al. Generalization of predators and nonpredators by juvenile rainbow trout: learning what is and is not a threat. Anim. Behav. 2011, 81:1249-1256.
46. Mitchell M.D., et al. Generalization of learned predator recognition in coral reef ecosystems: how cautious are damselfish?. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27:299-304.
47. Manassa R.P., et al. Socially acquired predator recognition in complex ecosystems. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2013, 67:1033-1040.
48. Manassa R.P., et al. Coral reef fish incorporate multiple sources of visual and chemical information to mediate predation risk. Anim. Behav. 2013, 86:717-722.
49. Agrillo C., et al. Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish. Anim. Cogn. 2008, 11:495-503.
50. Stancher G., et al. Discrimination of small quantities by fish (redtail splitfin, Xenotoca eiseni). Anim. Cogn. 2013, 16:307-312.
51. Dadda M., et al. Spontaneous number representation in mosquitofish. Cognition 2009, 112:343-348.
52. Gómez-Laplaza L.M., Gerlai R. Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber's law. Anim. Cogn. 2011, 14:1-9.
53. Feigenson L., et al. Core systems of number. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2004, 8:307-314.
54. Agrillo C., et al. Use of number by fish. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4786.
55. Piffer L., et al. Small and large number discrimination in guppies. Anim. Cogn. 2012, 15:215-221.
56. Piffer L., et al. Large number discrimination in newborn Fish. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e62466.
57. Hammerstein P. Why is reciprocity so rare in social animals? a protestant appeal. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation 2003, 83-93. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. P. Hammerstein (Ed.).
58. Raihani N.J., Bshary R. Resolving the iterated prisoner's dilemma: theory and reality. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:1628-1639.
59. Milinski M., et al. Tit for tat: sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) "trusting" a cooperating partner. Behav. Ecol. 1990, 1:7-11.
60. Croft D.P., et al. Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2006, 59:644-650.
61. Granroth-Wilding H.M.V., Magurran A.E. Asymmetry in pay-off predicts how familiar individuals respond to one another. Biol. Lett. 2013, 9:20130025.
62. Pinto A., et al. Cleaner wrasses Labroides dimidiatus are more cooperative in the presence of an audience. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1140-1144.
63. Bierbach D., et al. Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7:349-351.
64. Desjardins J.K., et al. Social context influences aggressive and courtship behavior in a cichlid fish. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e32781.
65. Dzieweczynski T.L., Perazio C.E. I know you: familiarity with an audience influences male-male interactions in Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2012, 66:1277-1284.
66. Raihani N.J., et al. Punishers benefit from third-party punishment in fish. Science 2010, 327:171.
67. Raihani N.J., et al. Male cleaner wrasses adjust punishment of female partners according to the stakes. Proc. R. Soc. B 2011, 279:365-370.
68. Raihani N.J., et al. Female cleaner fish cooperate more with unfamiliar males. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279:2479-2486.
69. Salwiczek L.H., et al. Adult cleaner wrasse outperform capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and orang-utans in a complex foraging task derived from cleaner - client reef fish cooperation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e49068.
70. Gingins S., et al. Power and temptation cause shifts between exploitation and cooperation in a cleaner wrasse mutualism. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2013, 280:20130553.
71. Van Schaik C.P., et al. Explaining brain size variation: from social to cultural brain. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2012, 16:277-284.
72. Salwiczek L.H., Bshary R. Cleaner wrasses keep track of the "when" and "what" in a foraging task. Ethology 2011, 117:939-948.
73. Clayton N.S., Dickinson A. Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 1998, 395:272-274.
74. Oates J., et al. The shadow of the future affects cooperation in a cleaner fish. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R472-R473.
75. Strübin C., et al. On group living and collaborative hunting in the yellow saddle goatfish (Parupeneus cyclostomus). Ethology 2011, 117:961-969.
76. Boesch C., Boesch H. Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1989, 78:547-573.
77. Vail A.L., et al. Referential gestures in fish collaborative hunting. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1765.
78. Grosenick L., et al. Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 2007, 445:429-432.
79. Passingham R.E., Wise S.P. The Neurobiology of the Prefrontal Cortex: Anatomy, Evolution, and the Origin of Insight 2012, Oxford University Press.
80. Raihani N.J., et al. Are cleaner fish, Labroides dimidiatus, inequity averse?. Anim. Behav. 2012, 84:665-674.
81. Zuberbühler K. Primate communication. New Perspectives on the Origins of Language 2013, 187-210. John Benjamins Publishing Company. C. Lefebvre (Ed.).
82. Formella I., et al. Transient knockdown of tyrosine hydroxylase during development has persistent effects on behaviour in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e42482.
83. Sørensen C., et al. Neural plasticity and stress coping in teleost fishes. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2013, 181:25-34.
84. Spinello C., et al. Acute ethanol administration affects zebrafish preference for a biologically inspired robot. Alcohol 2013, 47:391-398.
85. Soares M.C., et al. Tactile stimulation lowers stress in fish. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:534.
86. Field T., et al. Cortisol decreases and serotonin and dopamine increase following massage therapy. Int. J. Neurosci. 2005, 115:1397-1413.
87. Dunbar R.I.M. The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:260-268.
88. Torney C., et al. Context-dependent interaction leads to emergent search behavior in social aggregates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:22055-22060.
89. Grunbaum D. A spatially explicit Bayesian framework for cognitive schooling behaviours. Interface Focus 2012, 2:738-745.
90. Katsikopoulos K.V., King A.J. Swarm intelligence in animal groups: when can a collective out-perform an expert?. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e15505.
91. Couzin I.D. Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2009, 13:36-43.
92. Conradt L., Roper T.J. Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20:449-456.
93. Ward A.J.W., et al. Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:6948-6953.
94. Ward A.J.W., et al. Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:2312-2315.
95. Miller N., et al. Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:5263-5268.
96. Sumpter D.J.T., et al. Consensus decision making by fish. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1773-1777.
97. Faria J.J., et al. A novel method for investigating the collective behaviour of fish: introducing "Robofish.". Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2010, 64:1211-1218.
98. Yopak K.E. Neuroecology of cartilaginous fishes: the functional implications of brain scaling. J. Fish Biol. 2012, 80:1968-2023.
99. Collin S.P. The neuroecology of cartilaginous fishes: sensory strategies for survival. Brain Behav. Evol. 2012, 80:80-96.