Technology for Innovation in Radiation Oncology

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 485-492

  Chetty, Indrin J ^a   Martel, Mary K ^b   Jaffray, David A ^c   Benedict, Stanley H ^d   Hahn, Stephen M ^b   Berbeco, Ross ^e   Deye, James ^f   Jeraj, Robert ^g   Kavanagh, Brian ^h   Krishnan, Sunil ^b   Lee, Nancy ⁱ   Low, Daniel A ^j   Mankoff, David ^k   Marks, Lawrence B ^l   Ollendorf, Daniel ^m   Paganetti, Harald ⁿ   Ross, Brian ^o   Siochi, Ramon Alfredo C ^p   Timmerman, Robert D ^q   Wong, John W ^r  

^a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HOSPITALS   (United States)

^m INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC REVIEW   (United States)

ⁿ MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^p WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^r JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION SCIENCE; ONCOLOGY; RADIATION;

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY; NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; RADIATION THERAPY TREATMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT;

RADIOTHERAPY;

NANOPARTICLE; PROTON; ION;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; GENOMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METABOLOMICS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULARLY TARGETED THERAPY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; RADIATION SAFETY; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOTHERAPY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; NEOPLASMS; PROTON THERAPY; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; RADIOSURGERY; TRENDS;

HUMANS; IONS; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROTON THERAPY; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; RADIOSURGERY; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84942324472     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. P. Iyengar, and R.D. Timmerman Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Rationale and outcomes J Natl Compr Canc Netw 10 2012 1514 1520
2. J.M. Brown, D.J. Brenner, and D.J. Carlson Dose escalation, not "new biology," can account for the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy with non-small cell lung cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85 2013 1159 1160
3. R.D. Timmerman, J. Herman, and L.C. Cho Emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy and its impact on current and future clinical practice J Clin Oncol 32 2014 2847 2854
4. D.A. Jaffray Image-guided radiotherapy: From current concept to future perspectives Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9 2012 688 699
5. C.C. Ling, J. Humm, S. Larson, and et al. Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): Biological imaging and biological conformality Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47 2000 551 560
6. K.L. Moore, G.C. Kagadis, T.R. McNutt, and et al. Vision 20/20: Automation and advanced computing in clinical radiation oncology Med Phys 41 2014 010901
7. A.J. Chan, M.K. Islam, T. Rosewall, and et al. The use of human factors methods to identify and mitigate safety issues in radiation therapy Radiother Oncol 97 2010 596 600
8. T.G. Purdie, R.E. Dinniwell, A. Fyles, and et al. Automation and intensity modulated radiation therapy for individualized high-quality tangent breast treatment plans Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90 2014 688 695
9. Available at: http://www.wired.com/2013/11/open-source-a-platform-for-innovation/. Accessed May 1, 2015.
10. P. Kupelian, and J.J. Sonke Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy: A solution to the future Semin Radiat Oncol 24 2014 227 232
11. M. Karlsson, M.G. Karlsson, T. Nyholm, and et al. Dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in the radiotherapy clinic Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74 2009 644 651
12. O. Jakel, C.P. Karger, and J. Debus The future of heavy ion radiotherapy Med Phys 35 2008 5653 5663
13. T. Mitin, and A.L. Zietman Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particle therapy J Clin Oncol 32 2014 2855 2863
14. A.M. Allen, T. Pawlicki, L. Dong, and et al. An evidence based review of proton beam therapy: The report of ASTRO's emerging technology committee Radiother Oncol 103 2012 8 11
15. H. Paganetti Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations Phys Med Biol 57 2012 R99 R117
16. R.F. Hurley, R.W. Schulte, V.A. Bashkirov, and et al. Water-equivalent path length calibration of a prototype proton CT scanner Med Phys 39 2012 2438 2446
17. W. Liu, R. Mohan, P. Park, and et al. Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers Pract Radiat Oncol 4 2015 384 391
18. J.C. Polf, S. Peterson, M. McCleskey, and et al. Measurement and calculation of characteristic prompt gamma ray spectra emitted during proton irradiation Phys Med Biol 54 2009 N519 N527
19. T. Kamada, H. Tsujii, E.A. Blakely, and et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: An assessment of 20 years of clinical experience Lancet Oncol 16 2015 e93 e100
20. D.K. Chatterjee, P. Diagaradjane, and S. Krishnan Nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermia in cancer therapy Ther Deliv 2 2011 1001 1014
21. G. Hariri, M.S. Wellons, W.H. Morris 3rd, and et al. Multifunctional FePt nanoparticles for radiation-guided targeting and imaging of cancer Ann Biomed Eng 39 2011 946 952
22. D.K. Chatterjee, T. Wolfe, J. Lee, and et al. Convergence of nanotechnology with radiation therapy - insights and implications for clinical translation Transl Cancer Res 2 2013 256 268
23. R.I. Berbeco, H. Korideck, W. Ngwa, and et al. DNA damage enhancement from gold nanoparticles for clinical MV photon beams Radiat Res 178 2012 604 608
24. W. Ngwa, R. Kumar, S. Sridhar, and et al. Targeted radiotherapy with gold nanoparticles: Current status and future perspectives Nanomedicine (Lond) 9 2014 1063 1082
25. R.M. Crist, J.H. Grossman, A.K. Patri, and et al. Common pitfalls in nanotechnology: Lessons learned from NCI's Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Integr Biol (Camb) 5 2013 66 73
26. NIH Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN). Available at: http://imaging.cancer.gov. Accessed May 1, 2015.
27. T.C. Yen, D. Visvikis, T. Pan, and et al. Biomedical imaging: Role and opportunities of medical imaging in the "omics" era Biomed Res Int 2014 2014 930213
28. D.A. Mankoff, F. Dehdashti, and A.F. Shields Characterizing tumors using metabolic imaging: PET imaging of cellular proliferation and steroid receptors Neoplasia 2 2000 71 88
29. H. Kurihara, N. Honda, Y. Kono, and et al. Radiolabelled agents for PET imaging of tumor hypoxia Curr Med Chem 19 2012 3282 3289
30. T.J. Bradshaw, S. Yip, N. Jallow, and et al. Spatiotemporal stability of Cu-ATSM and FLT positron emission tomography distributions during radiation therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89 2014 399 405
31. M.H. Stenmark, Y. Cao, H. Wang, and et al. Estimating functional liver reserve following hepatic irradiation: Adaptive normal tissue response models Radiother Oncol 111 2014 418 423
32. P. Metcalfe, G.P. Liney, L. Holloway, and et al. The potential for an enhanced role for MRI in radiation-therapy treatment planning Technol Cancer Res Treat 12 2013 429 446
33. S. Devic MRI simulation for radiotherapy treatment planning Med Phys 39 2012 6701 6711
34. C. Tsien, Y. Cao, and T. Chenevert Clinical applications for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy Semin Radiat Oncol 24 2014 218 226
35. B.A. Hoff, M.S. Bhojani, J. Rudge, and et al. DCE and DW-MRI monitoring of vascular disruption following VEGF-Trap treatment of a rat glioma model NMR Biomed 25 2012 935 942
36. P.J. Foster, E.A. Dunn, K.E. Karl, and et al. Cellular magnetic resonance imaging: In vivo imaging of melanoma cells in lymph nodes of mice Neoplasia 10 2008 207 216
37. B. O'Sullivan, S.H. Huang, L.L. Siu, and et al. Deintensification candidate subgroups in human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer according to minimal risk of distant metastasis J Clin Oncol 31 2013 543 550
38. K.D. Voduc, M.C. Cheang, S. Tyldesley, and et al. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse J Clin Oncol 28 2010 1684 1691
39. NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) Initiative. Available at: http://bd2k.nih.gov. Accessed May 1, 2015.
40. NSF Big Data Initiative. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/cise/news/bigdata. Accessed May 1, 2015.
41. B.J. Miriovsky, L.N. Shulman, and A.P. Abernethy Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care J Clin Oncol 30 2012 4243 4248
42. J.R. Palta, J.A. Efstathiou, J.E. Bekelman, and et al. Developing a national radiation oncology registry: From acorns to oaks Pract Radiat Oncol 2 2012 10 17
43. euro-CAT initiative for Rapid Learning. Available at: http://www.eurocat.info/. Accessed May 1, 2015.
44. McNutt T, Wong J, Purdy J, et al. OncoSpace: A new paradigm for clinical research and decision support in radiation oncology. In: XVth International Conference on Computers in Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2010). 2010.
45. T. Skripcak, C. Belka, W. Bosch, and et al. Creating a data exchange strategy for radiotherapy research: Towards federated databases and anonymised public datasets Radiother Oncol 113 2014 303 309
46. A.J. Buckler, L. Bresolin, N.R. Dunnick, and et al. A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging Radiology 258 2011 906 914
47. A. Jackson, L.B. Marks, S.M. Bentzen, and et al. The lessons of QUANTEC: Recommendations for reporting and gathering data on dose-volume dependencies of treatment outcome Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76 2010 S155 S160
48. G.C. Kagadis, C. Kloukinas, K. Moore, and et al. Cloud computing in medical imaging Med Phys 40 2013 070901
49. C.N. Coleman, and E. Glatstein The road not taken and choices in radiation oncology Oncologist 15 2010 332 337
50. J.E. Bekelman, A. Shah, and S.M. Hahn Implications of comparative effectiveness research for radiation oncology Pract Radiat Oncol 1 2011 72 80
51. A.T. Berman, B.K. Teo, D. Dolney, and et al. An in-silico comparison of proton beam and IMRT for postoperative radiotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer Radiat Oncol 8 2013 144
52. A.A. Aizer, X. Gu, M.H. Chen, and et al. Cost implications and complications of overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer in the United States J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13 2015 61 68
53. T. Athanaileas, A. Menychtas, D. Dionysiou, and et al. Exploiting grid technologies for the simulation of clinical trials: The paradigm of in silico radiation oncology Simulation 87 2011 893 910
54. J.E. Bekelman, J.A. Deye, B. Vikram, and et al. Redesigning radiotherapy quality assurance: Opportunities to develop an efficient, evidence-based system to support clinical trials-report of the National Cancer Institute Work Group on Radiotherapy Quality Assurance Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83 2012 782 790
55. A. Zietman Proton beam and prostate cancer: An evolving debate Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 18 2013 338 342
56. L.K. Mell, and A.L. Zietman Introducing prospective manuscript review to address publication bias Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90 2014 729 732
57. J.A. Efstathiou, D.S. Nassif, T.R. McNutt, and et al. Practice-based evidence to evidence-based practice: Building the National Radiation Oncology Registry J Oncol Pract 9 2013 e90 e95
58. P. Lambin, R.G. van Stiphout, M.H. Starmans, and et al. Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology: Multifactorial decision support systems Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10 2013 27 40
59. B.S. Rosenstein, C.M. West, S.M. Bentzen, and et al. Radiogenomics: Radiobiology enters the era of big data and team science Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89 2014 709 713