Practice-based evidence to evidence-based practice: Building the national radiation oncology registry

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Efstathiou, Jason A ^a   Nassif, Deborah S ^a   McNutt, Todd R ^a   Bogardus, C Bob ^a   Bosch, Walter ^a   Carlin, Jeffrey ^a   Chen, Ronald C ^a   Chou, Henry ^a   Eggert, Dave ^a   Fraass, Benedick A ^a   Goldwein, Joel ^a   Hoffman, Karen E ^a   Hotz, Ken ^a   Hunt, Margie ^a   Kessler, Marc ^a   Lawton, Colleen A F ^a   Mayo, Charles ^a   Michalski, Jeff M ^a   Mutic, Sasa ^a   Potters, Louis ^a   Rose, Christopher M ^a   Sandler, Howard M ^a   Sharp, Gregory ^a   Tomé, Wolfgang ^a   Tran, Phuoc T ^a   Wall, Terry ^a   Zietman, Anthony L ^a   Gabriel, Peter E ^a   Bekelman, Justin E ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY; ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; ONCOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; REGISTER; UNITED STATES;

DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; REGISTRIES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84883261255     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Asher AL, McGirt MJ, Glassman SD, et al: Regulatory considerations for prospective patient care registries: Lessons learned from the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus 34:E5, 2013
2. Messenger JC, Ho KK, Young CH, et al: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) data quality brief: The NCDR data quality program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1484-1488, 2012
3. Shahian DM, Jacobs JP, Edwards FH, et al: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Heart [epub ahead of print on Jan 18, 2013]
4. Tunis S, Whicher D: The National Oncologic PET Registry: Lessons learned for coverage with evidence development. J Am Coll Radiol 6:360-365, 2009
5. Neuss MN, Desch CE, McNiff KK, et al: A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol 23:6233-6239, 2005
6. Palta JR, Efstathiou JA, Bekelman JE, et al: Developing a national radiation oncology registry: From acorns to oaks. Pract Radiat Oncol 2:10-17, 2011
7. Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization Board on Health Care Services of the Institute of Medicine: Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2009
8. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Litwin MS, et al: The contemporary management of prostate cancer in the United States: Lessons from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor (CapSURE), a national disease registry. J Urol 171:1393-1401, 2004 (Pubitemid 38365382)
9. Jackson A, Marks LB, Bentzen SM, et al: The lessons of QUANTEC: Recommendations for reporting and gathering data on dose-volume dependencies of treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S155-S160, 2010 (suppl)
10. Wilson JF, Owen J: Quality research in radiation oncology: A self-improvement initiative 30 years ahead of its time? J Am Coll Radiol 2:1001-1007, 2005 (Pubitemid 41814784)
11. Kun LE, Haffty BG, Bosma J, et al: American Board of Radiology Maintenance of Certification. Part IV: Practice quality improvement for radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:7-12, 2007 (Pubitemid 46589848)
12. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al: EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59:61-71, 2011
13. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology prostate cancer: Prostate cancer 2012, version 1.2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/pdf/prostate.pdf
14. National Quality Forum: NQF endorsed quality measures. http://www.qualityforum.org/QPS/
15. American Society of Clinical Oncology: QOPI summary of measures: Spring 2013. http://qopi.asco.org/Documents/QOPISpring13MeasuresSummary-002.pdf
16. Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al: Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 177:2106-2131, 2007 (Pubitemid 46726449)
17. Ahmed HU, Akin O, Coleman JA, et al: Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 109:1636-1647, 2012
18. Michalski JM, Roach M 3rd, Merrick G, et al: ACR appropriateness criteria on external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer expert panel on radiation oncology-prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:667-672, 2009
19. Moran BJ, DeRose P, Hsu IC, et al: ACR Appropriateness Criteria definitive external beam irradiation in stage T1 and T2 prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 34:636-647, 2011
20. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al: EAU guidelines on prostate cancer: Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 59:572-583, 2011
21. Boehmer D, Maingon P, Poortmans P, et al: Guidelines for primary radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 79:259-269, 2006 (Pubitemid 44109911)
22. Gay HA, Barthold HJ, O'Meara E, et al: Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiation therapy: A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:e353-e362, 2012
23. Simmons MN, Berglund RK, Jones JS: A practical guide to prostate cancer diagnosis and management. Cleve Clin J Med 78:321-331, 2011
24. Yamada Y, Rogers L, Demanes DJ, et al: American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 11:20-32, 2012
25. Expert Panel on Radiation-Prostate, Frank SJ, Arterbery VE, et al: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria permanent source brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 10:357-362, 2011
26. National Cancer Insitutute: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), 2010, version 4.03. http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE-4. 03-2010-06-14-QuickReference-8.5x11.pdf
27. Casalino DD, Remer EM, Arellano RS, et al: ACR Appropriateness Criteria posttreatment follow-up of prostate cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 8:863-871, 2011
28. McIntosh HM, Neal RD, Rose P, et al: Follow-up care for men with prostate cancer and the role of primary care: A systematic review of international guidelines. Br J Cancer 100:1852-1860, 2009