Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 257-265

  Ruurda, J P ^a   Van Der Sluis, P C ^a   Van Der Horst, S ^a   Van Hilllegersberg, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

esophageal surgery; minimally invasive; RAMIE; RATE; ROBOT assisted

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; DIAPHRAGM; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; HUMAN; MEDIASTINUM; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL RESECTION; ROBOT ASSISTED MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOT ASSISTED TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT INDICATION; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE;

ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; HUMANS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84942314546     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23922     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al.,: Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. NEJM 2002; 347: 1662-1669.
2. Omloo JMT, Lagarde SM, et al.,: Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 992-1001.
3. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al.,: Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-1892.
4. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, et al.,: Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: A population-based national study. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 197-203.
5. van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, et al.,: First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1435-1439.
6. Boone J, Schipper ME, Moojen WA, et al.,: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 878-886.
7. Ruurda JP, Draaisma WA, van Hillegersberg R, et al.,: Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: A four-year single-center experience. Dig Surg 2005; 22: 313-320.
8. Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, et al.,: Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1-158.
9. Anderson C, Hellan M, Kernstine K, et al.,: Robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. Int J Med Robot 2007; 3: 297-300.
10. Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Shamoun DM, et al.,: The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: Initial experience. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 2285-2292.
11. Galvani CA, Gorodner MV, Moser F, et al.,: Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 188-195.
12. Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, et al.,: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 53-9e1.
13. Puntambekar SP1, Rayate N, Joshi S, et al.,: Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy in the prone position: Experience with 32 patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 1283-1284.
14. Sutherland J, Banerji N, Morphew J, et al.,: Postoperative incidence of incarcerated hiatal hernia and its prevention after robotic transhiatal esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 1526-1530.
15. Hernandez JM, Dimou F, Weber J, et al.,: Defining the learning curve for robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 1346-1351.
16. Weksler B, Sharma P, Moudgill N, et al.,: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2012; 25: 403-409.
17. Cerfolio RJ1, Bryant AS, Hawn MT,: Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 90-96.
18. Dunn DH, Johnson EM, Morphew JA, et al.,: Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: A 3-year single-center experience. Dis Esophagus. 2013; 26: 159-166.
19. Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Finley DJ, et al.,: Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using a four-arm platform: Experience, technique and cautions during early procedure development. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43: e107-e115.
20. Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, et al.,: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: Technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012; 36: 1608-1616.
21. Coker AM1, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Cheverie J, et al.,: Outcomes of robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014; 24: 89-94.
22. Kim DJ, Park SY, Lee S, et al.,: Feasibility of a robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1866-1873.
23. Trugeda S, Fernández-Díaz MJ, Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC, et al.,: Initial results of robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis in the prone position. Int J Med Robot 2014; 10: 397-403.
24. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al.,: Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 95-103.
25. Blencowe NS, Strong S, McNair AG, et al.,: Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: A systematic review. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 658-666.
26. van der Sluis PC, Verhage RJJ, van der Horst S, et al.,: A new clinical scoring system to define pneumonia following esophagectomy for cancer. Dig Surg 2014; 31: 108-116.
27. Hou YL, Zhao JQ, Guo W, et al.,: Comparison of the short-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in left lateral position and in prone position. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012; 15: 950-953.
28. Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al.,: International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg 2015; 262: 286-294.
29. Haverkamp L, van der Sluis PC, Verhage RJ, et al.,: End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 872-876.
30. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Low DE,: Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: Systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 2015; 28: 468-475.
31. van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, et al.,: Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials 2012; 13: 230.
32. Cuesta MA1, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, et al.,: A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic oesophagus: The meso-oesophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 2576-2582.
33. Tjiam IM, Goossens RH, Schout BM, et al.,: Ergonomics in endourology and laparoscopy: An overview of musculoskeletal problems in urology. J Endourol 2014; 28: 605-611.
34. Shen Y, Feng M, Tan L, et al.,: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone versus decubitus position: Ergonomic evaluation from a randomized and controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98: 1072-1078.
35. van der Poel HG, Buckle T, Brouwer OR, et al.,: Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: Clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 826-833.
36. Pessaux P, Diana M, Soler L, et al.,: Robotic duodenopancreatectomy assisted with augmented reality and real-time fluorescence guidance. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2493-2498.
37. Soler L, Nicolau S, Pessaux P, et al.,: Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2014; 3: 73-81.
38. Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Alicuben ET, et al.,: Intraoperative Assessment of Perfusion of the Gastric Graft and Correlation With Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 74-78.