Robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 297-300

  Anderson, C ^a   Hellan, M ^a   Kernstine, K ^a   Ellenhorn, J ^a   Lai, L ^a   Trisal, V ^a   Pigazzi, A ^a,b  

^a CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Esophageal cancer; Gastric cancer; Gastrointestinal malignancies; Rectal cancer; Robotics

Indexed keywords

DISEASES;

BODY MASS; ESOPHAGEAL CANCER; ESOPHAGECTOMY; GASTRIC CANCERS; GASTROINTESTINAL; GASTROINTESTINAL MALIGNANCY; MASS INDEX; RECTAL CANCER; ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERIES; ROBOTICS SURGERY;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTRECTOMY; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL GASTRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECTUM RESECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GASTROINTESTINAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38949183040     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.155     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129(6): 1395-1404.
2. Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X, et al. Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29(3): 362-366.
3. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007; 51(3): 648-657.
4. Smith JA Jr, Herrell SD. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages? J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(32): 8170-8175.
5. Bodner J, Augustin F, Wykypiel H, et al. The da Vinci robotic system for general surgical applications: a critical interim appraisal. Swiss Med Wkly 2005; 135(45-46): 674-678.
6. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001; 25(11):1467- 1477.
7. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003; 138(7): 777-784.
8. Hashizume M, Tsugawa K. Robotic surgery and cancer: the present state, problems and future vision. Japan J Clin Oncol 2004; 34(5): 227-237.
9. Ruurda JP, Draaisma WA, van HR, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a four-year single-center experience. Dig Surg 2005; 22(5): 313-320.
10. Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(10): 1521-1524.
11. Melvin WS, Dundon JM, Talamini M, Horgan S. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery minimizes esophageal perforation during Heller myotomy. Surgery 2005; 138(4): 553-558.
12. Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Scheffer RC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2006; 93(11): 1351-1359.
13. Bodner J, Kafka-Ritsch R, Lucciarini P, et al. A critical comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomies. World J Surg 2005; 29(8): 982-985.
14. Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, et al. The robotic, two-stage, three-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127(6): 1847-1849.
15. Anderson C, Ellenhorn J, Hellan M, Pigazzi A. Pilot series of robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2007; 21(9): 1662-1666.
16. Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20(10): 1521-1525.
17. Bottger T, Terzic A, Muller M. [Extent of lymphnode dissection with minimally invasive esophageal resection]. Zentralbl Chir 2006; 131(6): 466-473.
18. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martini, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2007; 245(2): 232-240.
19. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005; 241(2): 232-237.
20. Shimizu S, Uchiyama A, Mizumoto K, et al. Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it superior to open surgery? Surg Endosc 2000; 14(1): 27-31.
21. Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, et al. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(9): 1177-1181.
22. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al. Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50(4): 464-471.
23. Bretagnol F, Lelong B, Laurent C, et al. The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(7): 892-896.
24. Breukink SO, Pierie JP, Grond AJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005; 20(5): 428-433.
25. Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anvari M, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42(7): 930-939.
26. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365(9472): 1718-1726.
27. Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK, et al. Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49(8): 1108-1115.
28. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, et al. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc 2006; 20(11): 1681-1686.
29. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 2005; 92(9): 1124-1132.
30. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170(5): 1738-1741.
31. Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91(4): 409-417.