Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Review of over 1000 patients

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 256, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 95-103

  Luketich, James D ^a   Pennathur, Arjun ^a   Awais, Omar ^a   Levy, Ryan M ^a   Keeley, Samuel ^a   Shende, Manisha ^a   Christie, Neil A ^a   Weksler, Benny ^a   Landreneau, Rodney J ^a   Abbas, Ghulam ^a   Schuchert, Matthew J ^a   Nason, Katie S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CHEST ANASTOMOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; IVOR LEWIS APPROACH; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; NECK ANASTOMOSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE INJURY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY;

AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED;

EID: 84863332251     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241-2252.
2. Pennathur A, Luketich JD. Resection for esophageal cancer: strategies for optimal management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:S751-S756.
3. Pennathur A, Farkas A, Krasinskas AM, et al. Esophagectomy for T1 esophageal cancer: outcomes in 100 patients and implications for endoscopic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1048-1054; Discussion 1054-1055.
4. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128-1137.
5. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486-494; Discussion 494-495
6. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Catalano PJ, et al. Results of a phase II multicenter study of MIE (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2202). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(suppl):15s; Abstract 4516.
7. Pennathur A, Awais O, Luketich JD. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:S2159-S2162
8. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Rangaswamy S, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position. An experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:7-16.
9. Schuchert MJ, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ, et al. Minimally-invasive esophagomyotomy in 200 consecutive patients: factors influencing postoperative outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1729-1734.
10. Morgenthal CB, Shane MD, Stival A, et al. The durability of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: 11-year outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:693-700.
11. Luketich JD, Nason KS, Christie NA, et al. Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:395-404
12. Onaitis MW, Petersen RP, Balderson SS, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:420-425.
13. Dallemagne B,Weerts JM, Jehaes C, et al. LaparoscopicNissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Percut Tech. 1991;1:138-143.
14. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992;37:7-11.
15. Depaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomywith esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech. 1995;5:1-5.
16. Swanstrom LL, Hanson P. Laparoscopic total esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 1997;132:943-949.
17. Lazzarino AI, Nagpa K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy. trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg Ann Surg. 2010;252:292-298.
18. Greene FL, American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York, NY: Springer; 2002.
19. StataCorp LP. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2008.
20. Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, et al. Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Ann Surg. 2001;234:520-530; Discussion 530
21. OrringerMB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg. 1999;230:392-400; Discussion 400-403.
22. Altorki N, Skinner D. Should en bloc esophagectomy be the standard of care for esophageal carcinoma? Ann Surg. 2001;234:581-587.
23. Swanson SJ, Batirel HF, Bueno R, et al. Transthoracic esophagectomy with radical mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection and cervical esophagogastrostomy for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1918-1924; Discussion 1924-1925.
24. Visbal AL, Allen MS, Miller DL, et al. Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1803-1808.
25. Mathisen DJ, Grillo HC, Wilkins E Jr, et al. Transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach to carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45:137-143.
26. Altorki N. En-bloc esophagectomy-the three-field dissection. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85:611-619
27. Hulscher JBF, van Sandick J, de Boer AGEM, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662-1669
28. Lerut T,Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:962-972; Discussion 972-974.
29. Rizk N, Venkatraman E, Park B, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:1374-1381.
30. Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, et al. The "best operation" for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:S2163-S2167.
31. Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, et al. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2003;238:803-812
32. Rindani R, Martin CJ, Cox MR. Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference? Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:187-194.
33. Wright CD, Kucharczuk JC, O'Brien SM, et al. Predictors of major morbidity andmortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:587-595; Discussion 596.
34. Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:135-146.
35. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, et al. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2007;246:363-372; Discussion 372-374.
36. Dimick JB, Goodney PP, Orringer MB, et al. Specialty training and mortality after esophageal cancer resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:282-286.
37. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Heitmiller RE, et al. Intensive care unit staffing is associated with decreased length of stay, hospital cost, and complications after esophageal resection. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:904-905.
38. Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg. 11:2.