Initial results of robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis in the prone position

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 397-403

  Trugeda, S ^a   Fernandez Diaz M J ^a   Rodriguez Sanjuan J C ^a   Palazuelos, C M ^a   Fernandez Escalante C ^a   Gomez Fleitas M ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO MARQUÉS DE VALDECILLA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Oesophageal cancer; Oesophagectomy; Robotic system; Thoracoscopy

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; PATIENT MONITORING; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

ESOPHAGEAL CANCER; ESOPHAGECTOMY; INTRATHORACIC; NO CONVERSION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRONE POSITION; PROSPECTIVES; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; STENTING; THORACOSCOPY;

LAPAROSCOPY;

ACUTE LUNG INJURY; ADULT; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BODY POSTURE; CHYLOTHORAX; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRATHORACIC HAND SEWN ANASTOMOSIS; LUNG WEDGE PRESSURE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIASTINUM; MOBILIZATION; MORTALITY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE PALSY; ROBOT ASSISTED IVOR LEWIS OESOPHAGECTOMY; ROBOTICS; THORACOSCOPY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRONE POSITION; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; THORACOSCOPY;

EID: 84916203225     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1587     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jamieson GG, Mathew G, Ludemann R, et al. Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 943-947.
2. Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1461-1467.
3. Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 13-20.
4. Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Greiner A, et al. Early experience with robot-assisted surgery for mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 259-265.
5. Hazey JW, Melvin WS. Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 2004; 11: 107-112.
6. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Hawn MT. Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 90-96.
7. Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Finley DJ, et al. Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic robotic-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy using a four-arm platform: experience, technique and cautions during early procedure development. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43(5): e107-e115.
8. de la Fuente SG, Weber J, Hoffe SE, et al. Initial experience from a large referral center with robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy for oncologic purposes. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3339-3347.
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213.
10. Briez N, Piessen G, Torres F, et al. Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1547-1553.
11. Boone J, Livestro DP, Elias SG, et al. International survey on esophageal cancer: part I surgical techniques. Dis Esophagus 2009; 22(3): 195-202.
12. Enestvedt CK, Perry KA, Kim C, et al. Trends in the management of esophageal carcinoma based on provider volume: treatment practices of 618 esophageal surgeons. Dis Esophag 2010; 23(2): 136-144.
13. Atkins B, Shah A, Hutcheson K, et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1170-1176.
14. Martin LW, Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, et al Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality. Ann Surg 2005; 242(3): 392-399, discussion 399-402.
15. van Boeckel PGA, Sijbring A, Vleggaar FP, et al. Systematic review: temporary stent placement for benign rupture or anastomotic leak of the esophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1292-1301.
16. Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 402-407.
17. Santillan AA, Farma JM, Meredith KL, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2008; 6(9): 879-884.
18. Nakajima M, Kato H, Miyazaki T, et al. Comprehensive investigations of quality of life after esophagectomy with special reference to the route of reconstruction. Hepatogastroenterology 2007; 54: 104-110.
19. Maas KW, Biere S, Scheepers JJ, et al. Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1795-1802.
20. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, et al. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2965-2973.
21. Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, et al. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2485-2491.
22. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position - experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 203: 7-16.
23. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003: 238; 486-494, discussion 494-495.
24. Kuwabara S, Katayanagi N. Comparison of three different operative methods of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Esophagus 2006; 7: 23-29.
25. Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1613-1618.
26. Gorenstein LA, Bessler M, Sonett JR. Intrathoracic linear stapled esophagogastric anastomosis: an alternative to the end-to-end anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 314-316.
27. Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, et al. The first series of completely robotic esophagectomies with three-field lymphadenectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 2285-2292.
28. Bodner JC, Zitt M, Ott H, et al. Robotic assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for benign and malignant esophageal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 1202-1206.
29. Boone J, Schipper ME, Moojen WA, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 878-886.
30. Puntambekar SP, Rayate N, Joshi S, et al. Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy in the prone position: experience with 32 patients with esophageal cancer. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 1283-1284.
31. Van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA, et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1435-1439.
32. Kim DJ, Hyung WJ, Lee CY, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 53-59e1.
33. Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012; 36: 1608-1616.
34. Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, DeMeester S, et al. A multicenter study of survival after neodjuvant radioterapy/chemotherapy and esophagectomy for ypT0N0M0R0 esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 744-749.