Connected vehicle penetration rate for estimation of arterial measures of effectiveness

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 60, Issue , 2015, Pages 298-312

  Argote Cabañero, Juan ^a   Christofa, Eleni ^b   Skabardonis, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of Massachusetts   (United States)

Author keywords

Connected vehicles; Measures of effectiveness; Minimum penetration rate; Signalized arterials; Traffic estimation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE;

CORRECTION FACTORS; ESTIMATION METHODS; MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS; PENETRATION RATES; SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS; TRAFFIC CONDITIONS; TRAFFIC ESTIMATION; VEHICLE PENETRATION;

VEHICLES;

ESTIMATION METHOD; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT VEHICLE; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE;

BERKELEY; CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942239737     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aboudolas K., Geroliminis N. Perimeter and boundary flow control in multi-reservoir heterogeneous networks. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2013, 55:265-281.
2. Alexiadis V., Colyar J., Halkias J., Hranac R., McHale G. The next generation simulation program. ITE J. 2004, 74:22-27.
3. Argote J., Christofa E., Xuan Y., Skabardonis A. Estimation of measures of effectiveness based on connected vehicle data. 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 2011, 1767-1772. IEEE.
4. Barceló J., Casas J. Dynamic network simulation with Aimsun. Simulation Approaches in Transportation Analysis 2005, 57-98. Springer.
5. Cambridge Systematics Inc., 2007. NGSIM Peachtree Street (Atlanta) Data Analysis (12:45p.m. to 1:00p.m.). Technical Report. Summary Report for Federal Highway Administration. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600, Oakland, CA 94607.
6. Cetin M., List G., Zhou Y. Factors affecting the minimum number of probes required for reliable travel time estimation. Transport. Res. Rec. 2005, 1917:37-44.
7. Chen M., Chien S. Determining the number of probe vehicles for freeway travel time estimation by microscopic simulation. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2000, 1719:61-68.
8. Cheng, Y., Qin, X., Jin, J., Ran, B., Anderson, J., 2011. Cycle by cycle queue length estimation for signalized intersections using sampled trajectory data. In: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting.
9. Cheu R.L., Xie C., Lee D.H. Probe vehicle population and sample size for arterial speed estimation. Comput.-Aid. Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 2002, 17:53-60.
10. Christofa E., Argote J., Skabardonis A. Arterial queue spillback detection and signal control based on connected vehicle technology. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2013, 2356:61-70.
11. Comert G. Effect of stop line detection in queue length estimation at traffic signals from probe vehicles data. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 2013, 226:67-76.
12. Comert G., Cetin M. Queue length estimation from probe vehicle location and the impacts of sample size. Euro. J. Oper. Res. 2009, 197:196-202.
13. Daganzo C.F., Geroliminis N. An analytical approximation for the macroscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2008, 42:771-781.
14. Dennis J.E., Schnabel R.B. Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Non-Linear Equations 1996, vol. 16. Siam.
15. Edie, L., 1963. Traffic stream measurements and definitions. In: 2nd International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow, pp. 139-154.
16. Fellendorf, M., 1994. Vissim: a microscopic simulation tool to evaluate actuated signal control including bus priority. In: 64th Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting, pp. 1-9.
17. Feng Y., Head K.L., Khoshmagham S., Zamanipour M. A real-time adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2015, 55:460-473.
18. Gayah V.V., Dixit V.V. Using mobile probe data and the macroscopic fundamental diagram to estimate network densities. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2013, 2390:76-86.
19. Geroliminis N. Cruising-for-parking in congested cities with an MFD representation. Econ. Transport. 2015, (in press) Available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012215000180.
20. Geroliminis N., Daganzo C.F. Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: some experimental findings. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2008, 42:759-770.
21. Geroliminis N., Haddad J., Ramezani M. Optimal perimeter control for two urban regions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams: a model predictive approach. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 2013, 14:348-359.
22. Gonzales E.J. Coordinated pricing for cars and transit in cities with hypercongestion. Econ. Transport. 2015, 4:64-81.
23. Gonzales E.J., Daganzo C.F. Morning commute with competing modes and distributed demand: user equilibrium, system optimum, and pricing. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2012, 46:1519-1534.
24. Guler S.I., Menendez M., Meier L. Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2014, 46:121-131.
25. Hao, P., Ban, X., 2011. Vehicle queue location estimation for signalized intersections using sample travel times from mobile sensors. In: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting.
26. He Q., Head K.L., Ding J. PAMSCOD: platoon-based arterial multi-modal signal control with online data. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2012, 20:164-184.
27. He Q., Head K.L., Ding J. Multi-modal traffic signal control with priority, signal actuation and coordination. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2014, 46:65-82.
28. Hu J., Park B.B., Lee Y.J. Coordinated transit signal priority supporting transit progression under connected vehicle technology. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2015, 55:393-408.
29. Jones T., Potts R. The measurement of acceleration noise - a traffic parameter. Oper. Res. 1962, 10:745-763.
30. Keyvan-Ekbatani M., Kouvelas A., Papamichail I., Papageorgiou M. Exploiting the fundamental diagram of urban networks for feedback-based gating. Transport. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2012, 46:1393-1403.
31. Keyvan-Ekbatani M., Papageorgiou M., Papamichail I. Urban congestion gating control based on reduced operational network fundamental diagrams. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2013, 33:74-87.
32. Li J.Q., Zhou K., Shladover S.E., Skabardonis A. Estimating queue length under connected vehicle technology. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2013, 2356:17-22.
33. Li, M., Zou, Z., Bu, F., Zhang, W., 2008. Application of vehicle-infrastructure integration (VII) data on real-time arterial performance measurements, in: Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting.
34. Nagle A.S., Gayah V.V. Accuracy of network wide traffic states estimated from mobile probe data. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2014, 2421:1-11.
35. Nanthawichit C., Nakatsuji T., Suzuki H. Application of probe-vehicle data for real-time traffic-state estimation and short-term travel-time prediction on a freeway. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2003, 1855:49-59.
36. Quiroga C.A., Bullock D. Determination of sample sizes for travel time studies. ITE J. 1998, 68:92-98.
37. Srinivasan K., Jovanis P. Determination of number of probe vehicles required for reliable travel time measurement in urban network. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 1996, 1537:15-22.
38. Steel R.G., Torrie J.H. Principles and Procedures of Statistics 1960, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
39. Sun Z., Ban X.J. Vehicle trajectory reconstruction for signalized intersections using mobile traffic sensors. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2013, 36:268-283.
40. Vasudevan, M., 2008. VII data characteristics for arterial applications. In: VII/CICAS Workshop, TRB Signal Systems Committee Mid-Year Meeting.
41. Venkatanarayana, R., Park, H., Smith, B., Skerrit, Jr., C., Ruhter, N., 2011. Application of IntelliDriveSM to address oversaturated conditions on arterials. In: Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting.