The Rediscovery of Slowness: Exploring the Timing of Cognition

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 616-628

  Kringelbach, Morten L ^a,b   McIntosh, Anthony R ^c   Ritter, Petra ^d,e   Jirsa, Viktor K ^f   Deco, Gustavo ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^e CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^f AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^g UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dynamical systems; Resting state activity; Whole brain modeling

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MODELS; COMPUTATION THEORY; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; NEUROIMAGING; TIMING CIRCUITS;

BRAIN FUNCTIONS; BRAIN PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DYNAMICAL CONSTRAINTS; OPTIMAL PROCESSING; RESTING STATE; SPONTANEOUS ACTIVITY; TASK-RELATED ACTIVITY;

BRAIN;

NEUROTRANSMITTER RECEPTOR;

BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; RESTING STATE NETWORK; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; COGNITION; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS;

EID: 84942124585     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.011     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Nadolny S. Die Entdeckung der Langsamkeit (transl. 'The Discovery of Slowness') 1983, Piper.
2. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23:645-665.
3. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R.R. Attention and cognitive control. Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium 1975, 55-85. Wiley. R.L. Solso (Ed.).
4. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
5. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow 2011, Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
6. Varela F., et al. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2:229-239.
7. Huys R., et al. Functional architectures and structured flows on manifolds: a dynamical framework for motor behavior. Psychol. Rev. 2014, 121:302-336.
8. Perdikis D., et al. Time scale hierarchies in the functional organization of complex behaviors. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1002198.
9. Woodman M., et al. Building neurocognitive networks with a distributed functional architecture. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 718:101-109.
10. Jirsa V.K., et al. On the nature of seizure dynamics. Brain 2014, 137:2210-2230.
11. Perdikis D., et al. Complex processes from dynamical architectures with time-scale hierarchy. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e16589.
12. Allen E.A., et al. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24:663-676.
13. Hansen E.C., et al. Functional connectivity dynamics: modeling the switching behavior of the resting state. Neuroimage 2015, 105:525-535.
14. Biswal B.B., et al. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:4734-4739.
15. Raichle M.E., Snyder A.Z. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage 2007, 37:1083-1090.
16. Morcom A.M., Fletcher P.C. Does the brain have a baseline? Why we should be resisting a rest. Neuroimage 2007, 37:1073-1082.
17. Raichle M.E., et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:676-682.
18. Beckmann C.F., et al. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:1001-1013.
19. Fransson P. Spontaneous low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: an fMRI investigation of the resting-state default mode of brain function hypothesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 26:15-29.
20. Biswal B., et al. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 34:537-541.
21. Fox M.D., et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:9673-9678.
22. Bullmore E., Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:186-198.
23. Deco G., et al. Resting brains never rest: computational insights into potential cognitive architectures. Trends Neurosci. 2013, 36:268-274.
24. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002, 15:273-289.
25. Desikan R.S., et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006, 31:968-980.
26. Vincent J.L., et al. Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature 2007, 447:83-86.
27. Moeller S., et al. Functional connectivity of the macaque brain across stimulus and arousal states. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:5897-5909.
28. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18:3870-3896.
29. Softky W.R., Koch C. The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J. Neurosci. 1993, 13:334-350.
30. Churchland M.M., et al. Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13:369-378.
31. Basser P.J., Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J. Magn. Reson. B 1996, 111:209-219.
32. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002, 15:435-455.
33. Johansen-Berg H., Rushworth M.F. Using diffusion imaging to study human connectional anatomy. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 32:75-94.
34. Hagmann P., et al. MR connectomics: principles and challenges. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 194:34-45.
35. Chang C., Glover G.H. Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI. Neuroimage 2010, 50:81-98.
36. Hutchison R.M., et al. Resting-state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34:2154-2177.
37. Kiviniemi V., et al. A sliding time-window ICA reveals spatial variability of the default mode network in time. Brain Connect. 2011, 1:339-347.
38. Ponce-Alvarez A., et al. Resting-state temporal synchronization networks emerge from connectivity topology and heterogeneity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015, 11:e1004100.
39. Tognoli E., Kelso J.A. The metastable brain. Neuron 2014, 81:35-48.
40. Barttfeld P., et al. Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112:887-892.
41. Deco G., et al. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 12:43-56.
42. Deco G., Jirsa V.K. Ongoing cortical activity at rest: criticality, multistability, and ghost attractors. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:3366-3375.
43. Breakspear M., Jirsa V. Neuronal dynamics and brain connectivity. Handbook of Brain Connectivity 2007, 3-64. Springer. V.K. Jirsa, A.R. McIntosh (Eds.).
44. Haken H. Cooperative phenomena in systems far from thermal equilibrium and in nonphysical systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1975, 47:67-121.
45. Cabral J., et al. Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 114:102-131.
46. Deco G., et al. Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:10302-10307.
47. Ghosh A., et al. Cortical network dynamics with time delays reveals functional connectivity in the resting brain. Cogn. Neurodyn. 2008, 2:115-120.
48. Ghosh A., et al. Noise during rest enables the exploration of the brain's dynamic repertoire. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4:e1000196.
49. Cabral J., et al. Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2011, 57:130-139.
50. Cabral J., et al. Exploring mechanisms of spontaneous functional connectivity in MEG: How delayed network interactions lead to structured amplitude envelopes of band-pass filtered oscillations. Neuroimage 2014, 90:423-435.
51. Deco G., et al. Resting-state functional connectivity emerges from structurally and dynamically shaped slow linear fluctuations. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:11239-11252.
52. Honey C.J., et al. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:10240-10245.
53. Deco G., Kringelbach M.L. Great expectations: using whole-brain computational connectomics for understanding neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuron 2014, 84:892-905.
54. Freyer F., et al. Biophysical mechanisms of multistability in resting-state cortical rhythms. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:6353-6361.
55. Freyer F., et al. A canonical model of multistability and scale-invariance in biological systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8:e1002634.
56. Kuramoto Y. Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence 1984, Springer-Verlag.
57. Meisel C., et al. Critical slowing down governs the transition to neuron spiking. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015, 11:e1004097.
58. Schoner G., Kelso J.A. Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science 1988, 239:1513-1520.
59. Jirsa V.K., et al. Connecting cortical and behavioral dynamics: bimanual coordination. Neural Comput. 1998, 10:2019-2045.
60. Fuchs A., et al. Phase transitions in the human brain: spatial mode dynamics. Int. J. Bif. Chaos 1992, 2:917-939.
61. Ritter P., et al. State-dependencies of learning across brain scales. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2015, 9:1.
62. Ritter P., et al. Editorial: State-dependent brain computation. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2015, 9:77.
63. Boly M., et al. Stimulus set meaningfulness and neurophysiological differentiation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10:e0125337.
64. Berkes P., et al. Spontaneous cortical activity reveals hallmarks of an optimal internal model of the environment. Science 2011, 331:83-87.
65. Deco G., et al. Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16:430-439.
66. Uhlenbeck G.E., Ornstein L.S. On the theory of Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 1930, 36:823-841.
67. Parsons C.E., et al. The functional neuroanatomy of the evolving parent-infant relationship. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 91:220-241.
68. Bornstein M.H., et al. Emotional relationships in mothers and infants: culture-common and community-specific characteristics of dyads from rural and metropolitan settings in Argentina, Italy, and the United States. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 2012, 43:171-197.
69. Parsons C.E., et al. Ready for action: a role for the brainstem in responding to infant vocalizations. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2014, 9:977-984.
70. Kringelbach M.L., et al. A specific and rapid neural signature for parental instinct. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1664.
71. Parsons C.E., et al. Understanding the human parental brain: a critical role of the orbitofrontal cortex. Soc. Neurosci. 2013, 8:525-543.
72. Stein A., et al. Maternal cognitions and mother-infant interaction in postnatal depression and generalized anxiety disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2012, 121:795-809.
73. Bar M., et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:449-454.
74. Kringelbach M.L. The orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6:691-702.
75. Berridge K.C., Kringelbach M.L. Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron 2015, 86:646-664.
76. Rubinov M., Bullmore E. Fledgling pathoconnectomics of psychiatric disorders. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17:641-647.
77. Ritter P., et al. The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging. Brain Connect. 2013, 3:121-145.
78. Kringelbach M.L., et al. Balancing the brain: resting state networks and deep brain stimulation. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5:8.