Follow-up study of implants with turned or oxidized surfaces placed after sinus augmentation

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1380-1387

  Jungner, Måns ^a,b   Legrell, Per Erik ^b   Lundgren, Stefan ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone graft; Dental implants; Maxillary sinus; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; AUTOGRAFT; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA BLEEDING; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE MUCOSA; PARANASAL SINUS DISEASE; PERIODONTAL POCKET; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; AUTOGRAFTS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL MUCOSA; PARANASAL SINUS DISEASES; PERIODONTAL POCKET; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84942104510     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3629     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Cho-Lee GY, Naval-Gias L, Castrejon-Castrejon S, et al. A 12-year retrospective analytic study of the implant survival rate in 177 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:1019-1027.
2. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
3. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, et al. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: A 5-year retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:504-514.
4. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B, et al. Nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:115-127.
5. Stricker A, Voss PJ, Gutwald R, et al. Maxillary sinus floor augmention with autogenous bone grafts to enable placement of SLAsurfaced implants: Preliminary results after 15-40 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:207-212.
6. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
7. Schneider AC, Bragger U, Sendi P, et al. Characteristics and dimensions of the sinus membrane in patients referred for single-implant treatment in the posterior maxilla: A cone beam computed tomographic analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:587-596.
8. Sjöström M, Sennerby L, Nilson H, et al. Reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with free iliac crest grafts and implants: A 3-year report of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9:46-59.
9. Becktor JP, Hallström H, Isaksson S, et al. The use of particulate bone grafts from the mandible for maxillary sinus floor augmentation before placement of surface-modified implants: Results from bone grafting to delivery of the final fixed prosthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:780-786.
10. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: Anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology-eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990). J Oral Implantol 1990;16:199-209.
11. Jungner M, Lundqvist P, Lundgren S. A retrospective comparison of oxidized and turned implants with respect to implant survival, marginal bone level and peri-implant soft tissue conditions after at least 5 years in function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:230-237. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
12. Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Reintsema H, et al. Bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;35:119-125.
13. Lundgren S, Moy P, Johansson C, et al. Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor with particulated mandible: A histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:760-766.
14. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:635-643.
15. Fröberg KK, Lindh C, Ericsson I. Immediate loading of Brånemark System Implants: A comparison between TiUnite and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:187-197.
16. Albouy J, Abrahamsson I, Persson L, et al. Spontaneous progression of ligature-induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface characteristics. An experimental study in dogs. II: Histological observations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:366-371.
17. Karabuda C, Ozdemir O, Tosun T, et al. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. J Periodontol 2001;72:1436-1442.
18. Albrektsson T, Gottlow J, Meirelles L, et al. Survival of NobelDirect implants: An analysis of 550 consecutively placed implants at 18 different clinical centers. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9:65-70.
19. Kassolis JD, Rosen PS, Reynolds MA. Alveolar ridge and sinus augmentation utilizing platelet-rich plasma in combination with freeze-dried bone allograft: Case series. J Periodontol 2000;71:1654-1661.
20. Su-Gwan K, Hak-Kyun K, Sung-Chul L. Combined implantation of particulate dentine, plaster of Paris, and a bone xenograft (Bio-Oss) for bone regeneration in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:282-288.
21. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616.
22. Friberg B, Jemt T. Clinical experience of TiUnite implants: A 5-year cross-sectional, retrospective follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12(suppl 1):e95-103.
23. Kaufman E. Maxillary sinus elevation surgery: An overview. J Esthet Restorative Dent 2003;15:272-282.
24. Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E, et al. Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:157-163.
25. Nkenke E, Radespiel-Troger M, Wiltfang J, et al. Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: A prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:514-521.
26. Thorwarth M, Srour S, Felszeghy E, et al. Stability of autogenous bone grafts after sinus lift procedures: A comparative study between anterior and posterior aspects of the iliac crest and an intraoral donor site. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:278-284.
27. Raghoebar GM, Louwerse C, Kalk WW, Vissink A. Morbidity of chin bone harvesting. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:503-507.
28. Kirmeier R, Payer M, Lorenzoni M, et al. Harvesting of cancellous bone from the proximal tibia under local anesthesia: donor site morbidity and patient experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2235-2241.
29. Carinci F, Farina A, Zanetti U, et al. Alveolar ridge augmentation: A comparative longitudinal study between calvaria and iliac crest bone grafts. J Oral Implantol 2005;31:39-45.
30. Friberg B, Dahlin C, Widmark G, et al. One-year results of a prospective multicenter study on Brånemark System implants with a TiUnite surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(suppl 1):S70-75.
31. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, et al. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-577.
32. Cabezas-Mojón J, Barona-Dorado C, Gómez-Moreno G, et al. Metaanalytic study of implant survival following sinus augmentation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e135-139.
33. Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Radiographic maxillary sinus findings in the elderly. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:487-491.
34. Marchetti C, Pieri F, Trasarti S, et al. Impact of implant surface and grafting protocol on clinical outcomes of endosseous implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:399-407.
35. Schmitt C, Karasholi T, Lutz R, et al. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and combination of both techniques: A long-term retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e38-46.
36. Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris G, et al. Implant success in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone: A 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:316-324.
37. Sbordone C, Toti P, Ramaglia L, et al. A 5-year clinical and computerized tomographic implant follow-up in sinus-lifted maxillae and native bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1056-1064.
38. Martuscelli R, Toti P, Sbordone L, et al. Five-year outcome of bone remodelling around implants in the maxillary sinus: Assessment of differences between implants placed in autogenous inlay bone blocks and in ungrafted maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:1117-1126.
39. Kahnberg KE, Vannas-Löfqvist L. Sinus lift procedure using a 2-stage surgical technique: I. Clinical and radiographic report up to 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:876-884.
40. Manor Y, Mardinger O, Bietlitum I, et al. Late signs and symptoms of maxillary sinusitis after sinus augmentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:e1-e4.