Characteristics and dimensions of the sinus membrane in patients referred for single-implant treatment in the posterior maxilla: A cone beam computed tomographic analysis

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 587-596

  Schneider, Adrienne C ^a   Brägger, Urs ^a   Sendi, Pedram ^b   Caversaccio, Marco D ^a   Buser, Daniel ^a   Bornstein, Michael M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Mucosal thickness; Posterior maxilla; Sinus floor elevation; Sinus membrane

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; MUCOSA; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANT; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; MUCOUS MEMBRANE;

EID: 84894323430     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3007     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8: 1558-1564.
2. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld, S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31: 126-130.
3. Bremke M, Sesterhenn AM, Murthum T, et al. Digital volume tomography (DVT) as a diagnostic modality of the anterior skull base. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;31: 1-9.
4. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103: 114-119.
5. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009;42: 463-475.
6. Janner SFM, Jeger FB, Lussi A, Bornstein MM. Precision of endodontic working length measurements: A pilot investigation comparing cone-beam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod 2011;37: 1046-1051.
7. Bornstein MM, Wölner-Hanssen AB, Sendi P, von Arx T. Comparison of intraoral radiography and limited cone beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-fractured permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2009;25: 571-577.
8. Riglone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD. Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the first molar: "Low-dose cone-beam" CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003;29: 773-775.
9. Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 2008;34: 557-562.
10. Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Sendi P, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery. J Endod 2010;37: 151-157.
11. Bornstein MM, Wasmer J, Sendi P, Janner SFM, Buser D, von Arx T. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane and apical bone in maxillary molars referred for apical surgery: A comparative radiographic analysis using limited cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2012;38: 51-57.
12. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 2006;77: 1261-1266.
13. Kasaj A, Willershausen B. Digital volume tomography for diagnostics in periodontology. Int J Comput Dent 2007;10: 155-168.
14. Walter C, Kaner D, Berndt DC, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU. Threedimensional imaging as a pre-operative tool in decision making for furcation surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36: 250-257.
15. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10: 1-7.
16. Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26: 873-876.
17. Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, et al. E.A. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011: A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23: 1243-1253.
18. Fatterpekar GM, Delman BN, Som PM. Imaging the paranasal sinuses: Where we are and where we are going. Anat Rec 2008;291: 1564-1572.
19. Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: Clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24: 218-236.
20. Janner SFM, Caversaccio M, Dubach P, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: A radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22: 1446-1453.
21. Lana JP, Carneiro PM, Machado Vde C, de Souza PE, Manzi FR, Horta MC. Anatomic variations and lesions of the maxillary sinus detected in cone beam computed tomography for dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23: 1398-1403.
22. Soikkonen K, Ainamo A. Radiographic maxillary sinus findings in the elderly. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80: 487-491.
23. Cagici CA, Yilmazer C, Hurcan C, Ozer C, Ozer F. Appropriate interslice gap for screening coronal paranasal sinus tomography for mucosal thickening. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266: 519-525.
24. Baroody FM, Mucha SM, deTineo M, Naclerio RM. Evidence of maxillary sinus inflammation in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146: 880-886.
25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-310.
26. Min Y, Lee J, Shin J. Radiologic assessment of diseased mucosa of the maxillary sinus after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 1994;114: 657-662.
27. Rak KM, Newell JD II, Yakes WF, Damiano MA, Luethke JM. Paranasal sinuses on MR images of the brain: Significance of mucosal thickening. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156: 381-384.
28. Peleg M, Chaushu G, Mazor Z, Ardekian L, Bakoon M. Radiological findings of the post-sinus lift maxillary sinus: A computerized tomography follow-up. J Periodontol 1999;70: 1564-1573.
29. Pruna X. Morpho-functional evaluation of osteomeatal complex in chronic sinusitis by coronal CT. Eur Radiol 2003;13: 1461-1468.
30. Havas TE, Motbey JA, Gullane PJ. Prevalence of incidental abnormalities on computed tomographic scans of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114: 856-859.
31. Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S, Soikkonen K, Norblad A. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: Results from the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109: e80-e87.
32. Maestre-Ferrín L, Galán-Gil S, Carrillo-García C, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Radiographic findings in the maxillary sinus: Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26: 341-346.
33. Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A, Sendi P, Katsaros C. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: A radiographic study using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14: 17-24.
34. Kretzschmar DP, Kretzschmar JL. Rhinosinusitis: Review from a dental perspective. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96: 128-135.
35. Mehra P, Caiazzo A, Bestgen S. Odontogenic sinusitis causing orbital cellulitis. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130: 1086-1092.
36. Hodez C, Griffaton-Taillandier C, Bensimon I. Cone-beam imaging: Applications in ENT. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2011;128: 65-78.
37. Bornstein MM, von Arx T, Altermatt HJ. Loss of pulp sensitivity and pain as the first symptoms of an Ewing’s sarcoma in the right maxillary sinus and alveolar process: Report of a case. J Endod 2008;34: 1549-1553.
38. Bell GE, Joshi BB, Mcleaod RI. Maxillary sinus disease: Diagnosis and treatment. Br Dent J 2011;12: 113-118.
39. Price JB, Thaw KL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Padilla RJ. Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: A descriptive retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012 Nov;23: 1261-1268.
40. Torretta S, Mantovani M, Testori T, Cappadona M, Pignataro L. Importance of ENT assessment in stratifying candidates for sinus floor elevation: A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011 Nov 22. [epub ahead of print]
41. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38: 609-625.
42. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: Decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16: 80-89.
43. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. European Association for Osseointegration. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 566-570.
44. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37: 268-273.
45. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, et al. SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012;81: 267-271.
46. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Braun N, Kofler J, Yu L, Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2009;47: 27-40.
47. Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M. Dental x-rays and risk of meningioma. Cancer 2012;118: 4530-4537.
48. Katsuyama H, Jensen SS. Treatment options for sinus floor elevation. In: Chen S, Buser D, Wismeijer D (eds). ITI Treatment Guide. Vol 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures. Berlin: Quintessence, 2011: 33-57.
49. Pjetursson BE, Rast C, Brägger U, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients’ perception. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20: 667-676.
50. Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 × 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20: 930-937.
51. Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2012;91: 25-32.
52. Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: A 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21: 94-102.