Immediate loading of Brånemark System Implants®: A comparison between TiUnite™ and turned implants placed in the anterior mandible

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 187-197

  Fröberg, Kjell Krister ^a   Lindh, Christina ^b   Ericsson, Ingvar ^b,c  

^a Nässjö Implant Center   (Sweden)

^b MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

An oxidized implant surface; Br nemark dental implants; Clinical study; Immediate loading; Implant stability; Rebuild denture; Turned

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

AGED; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; CUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, IMMEDIATE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845640019     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00017.x     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Brånemark P-I, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson B-O, Ohlsson, Å. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3:81-100.
2. Zarb GA, Jansson T. Prosthodontic procedures. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb G and Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prosthesis. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1985:241-282.
3. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Öhman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstructive Surg 1977; 11(Suppl 16):7-132. (Monograph from Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, Sweden).
4. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edetulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:347-359.
5. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:626-635.
6. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:639-645.
7. Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutter F. Gewebsreaktion auf ein Titan-Hohlzylinder-Implantat mit Titan-Spritzschichtoberfäche. Schweizerische Monatschrift für Zahnheilkunde 1976; 86:713-727.
8. Schroder A, Stich H, Straumann F, Sutter F. Über die Anlagerung Osteocement an einem belasteten Implantatkörper. Schweizerische Monatschrift für Zahnheilkunde 1978; 88:1051-1058.
9. Schroder A, Maeglin B, Sutter F. Das ITI-Hohlzylinderimplantat Typ F zur Prothesenretention beim zahnlosen Kiefer. Schweizerische Monatschrift für Zahnheilkunde 1983; 93:720-733.
10. Gotfredsen K, Rostrup E, Hjorting-Hansen E, Stoltz K, Budtz-Jörgensen E. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reactions adjacent to endosteal implants in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991; 2:30-37.
11. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennström J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:212-219.
12. Weber H-P, Buser D, Donath K, Fiorellini JP. Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants. A histomorphometric study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:11-19.
13. Piatelli A, Paoloantonio M, Corigliano M, Scarano A. Bone reactions to early occlusal loading of two-stage titanium plasma-sprayed implants. A pilot study in monkey. Int J Periodont Res Dent 1997; 17:163-169.
14. Ericsson I, Nilner K, Klinge B, Glantz P-O. Radiographical and histological characteristics of submerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants. An experimental study in the Labrador dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 6:20-26.
15. Ericsson I, Randow K, Glantz P-O, Lindhe J, Nilner K. Some clinical and radiographical features of submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5:185-189.
16. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Petersson A. Some clinical and radiographical features of submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:422-426.
17. Henry P, Rosenberg J. Single-stage surgery for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results. Practical Periodontics Aesthetic Dent 1994; 6:1-8.
18. Bernard J-P, Belser UC, Martinet J-P, Borgis SA. Osseointegration of Brånemark fixtures using a single-step operating technique. A preliminary prospective one-year study in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6:122-129.
19. Becker W, Becker BE, Israelson, H et al. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective clinical multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12:454-462.
20. Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Comparison of Brånemark fixture integration and short-term survival using one-stage or two-stage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:131-135.
21. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Lindén B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:266-272.
22. Bogaerde L, Padretti G, Dellacasa P, Mozzati M, Rangert B, Eng M. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles using Brånemark System®, machined-surface implant: an 18 month prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):21-28.
23. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Brånemark System with TiUnite and machined surfaces in the posterior mandible: a randomized, open-ended trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):57-63.
24. Engquist B, Åstrand P, Anzén B, et al. Simplified methods of implant treatment in the edentulous lower jaw: a 3-year follow-up report of a controlled prospective study of one stage versus two-stage surgery and early loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:95-104.
25. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part I: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:161-172.
26. Åstrand P, Almfeldt I, Brunell G, Hamp S-E, Hellem S, Karlsson U. Non-submerged implants in the treatment of the edentulous lower jaw. A 2-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7:337-344.
27. Hellem S, Karlsson U, Almfeldt I, Brunell SE, Åstrand P. Non-submerged implant in the treatment of the edentulous lower jaw: a 5-year prospective longitudinal study of ITI hollow screws. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3:20-29.
28. Bergkvist G, Sahlholm S, Nilner K, Lindh C. Implant-supported fix prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:351-359.
29. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson RA. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25.
30. Cameron H, Pilliar RM, Macnab I. The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1973; 7:301-311.
31. Brunski JE. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Materials 1992; 3:153-201.
32. Brunski JE. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:99-119.
33. Pilliar RM. Quantitative evaluation of the effect of movement at a porous coated implant-bone interface. In: Davies EJ, ed. The bone-biomaterial interface. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 1995:380-387.
34. Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Bønger C. The effects of osteoporosis, bone deficiency, bone grafting and micromotion on fixation of porous-coated hydroxyapatite-coated implants. In: Gesink, RGT, Manley MT, eds. Hydroxypatite coatings in orthopaedic surgery. New York: Raven Press, 1993:107-136.
35. Glantz P-O, Strandman E, Svensson SA, Randow K. On functional strain in fixed mandibular reconstructions. I. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1984a; 42:241-249.
36. Glantz P-O, Strandman E, Randow K. On functional strain in fixed mandibular reconstructions. II. An in vivo study. Acta Odontol Scand 1984b; 42:269-276.
37. Randow K, Ericsson I, Nilner K, Petersson A, Glantz P-O. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:8-15.
38. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Petersson A. Early functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2:70-77.
39. Chow J, Hui E, Li D, Liu J. Immediate loading of Brånemark system fixtures in the mandible with a fixed provisional prothesis. Appl Osseointergration Res 2001; 2:30-35.
40. Ericsson I, Nilner K. Early functional loading using Brånemark dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22:9-19.
41. Schnitman PA, Wöhrle PS, Rubenstein JE, Da Silva JD, Wang N-H. Ten year results for Brånemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prostheses at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12:495-503.
42. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Immediate loading of Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles: a preliminary report. Implant Dent 1997; 6:83-88.
43. Brånemark P-I, Engstrand P, Öhrnell L-O, et al. A new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999; 1:2-16.
44. Van Steenberghe D, Molly L, Jacobs R, Vandekerckhove B, Quirynen M, Naert I. The immediate rehabilitation by means of a ready-made final fixed prosthesis in the edentulous mandible: a 1-year follow-up study of 50 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:360-365.
45. Hatano N. The Maxis New. A novel one-day technique for fixed individualized implant-supported prosthesis in the edentulous mandible using Brånemark System implants. Appl Osseointergration Res 2001; 2:40-43.
46. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Biomaterial and implant surface science: a surface science approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 4:247-259.
47. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Aspects of surface physics on titanium implants. Swed Dent J 1985; 28(Suppl):19-36.
48. Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. PhD thesis, Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, Göteborg University, Sweden, 1996.
49. Larsson C. The interface between bone and implants with different surface oxide properties. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000; 1:9-14.
50. Schüpbach P, Glauser R, Rocci A, et al. The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: a light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, black-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive X-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7(Suppl 1):36-43.
51. Karlsson U, Gotfredsen K, Olsson C. A 2-year report on maxillary and mandibular fixed partial dentures supported by Astra Tech dental implants. A comparison of 2 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:235-242.
52. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano ATI. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:668-674.
53. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2:70-77.
54. 2-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001; 10:2-7.
55. Hall J, Lausmaa J. Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000; 1:5-8.
56. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Sennerby L, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of a Brånemark System implant with the TiUnite surface. Histological evaluation after 9 months. Appl Osseointegration Res 2002; 3:25-28.
57. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologie evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:341-348.
58. Lekholm, U. The surgical site. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, eds. Clinical periodontotogy and implant dentistry. 4th ed. United Kingdom: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003:852-865.
59. Adell R, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I. Surgical procedures. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prosthesis. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 1985:211-232.
60. Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Mattsson L. Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materials. Appl Surface Sci 1990; 44:133-146.
61. Meredith N. On the clinical measurement of implant stability and osseointegration. PhD thesis, Göteborg University, Göteborg Sweden, 1997.
62. van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Nijboer A, Reijerse E, Van Der Velden U. Comparison of different approaches to assess bleeding on probing as indicators of gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 1994; 21:589-594.
63. Eggen S. Standardiserad intraoral röntgenteknik. Tandläkartidningen 1976; 17:867-872.
64. Rangert B, Renourd F. Practical guidelines based on biomechanical principles. In: Palacci P, Ericsson I, eds. Estehtic implant dentistry. Soft and hard tissue management. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence, 2001:47-68.
65. Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I, Hansson H-A, Lindström JJ. Osseointegrated titanum implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52:155-170.
66. Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Rolander U, Bjursten LM, Rosander L, Thomsen P. Preparation, surface spectroscopic and electron microscopic characterization of titanium implant materials. In: Ratner BD, ed. Surface chatacterization of biomaterials. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1988:161-173.
67. Binon P, Weir D, Marshall S. Surface analysis of an original Brånemark implant and there related clones. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:168-175.
68. Davis JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:391-401.
69. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):88-98.
70. Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Lundgren AK, Sul Y, Gottlow J. Experimental studies on oxidized implant. A histomorphometrical and biomechanical analysis. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000; 1:21-24.
71. Henry P, Tan A, Allen B, Hall J, Johansson C. Comparison of TiUnite and turned implants in the grayhound dog mandible. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000; 1:15-17.
72. Jungner M, Lundqvist P, Lundgren S. Oxidized titanium implants (Nobel Biocare® TiUnite™) compared with turned implants (Nobel Biocare® mark III™) with respect to implant failure in a group of consecutive patients treated with early functional loading and two-stage protocol. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:308-312.
73. Rompen E, DaSilva D, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Stability measurements of a double-threaded titanium implant design with turned or oxidized surface. An experimental resonance frequency analysis study in the dog mandible. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000; 1:18-20.
74. Zechner W, Tangl S, Fürst G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. A histological and histomorphometric study in mini-pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:150-157.
75. Glauser R, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J, et al. Loading of Brånemark TiUnite™ implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year result of a prospective, clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):47-56.
76. Glauser R, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S, et al. Loading of Brånemark System® TiUnite™ implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 4-year result of a prospective, clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7(Suppl 1):52-59.