Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 297-319

  Plano Clark, Vicki L ^a   Anderson, Nancy ^b   Wertz, Jessica A ^a   Zhou, Yuchun ^b   Schumacher, Karen ^c   Miaskowski, Christine ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

health sciences; longitudinal research; mixed methods designs; procedural issues; repeated measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942081932     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689814543563     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. M.*AdolfssonM.GranlundE.Björck-AkessonN.IbragimovaM.Pless (2010). Exploring changes over time in habilitation professionals’ perceptions and applications of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, version for Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 670-678.
2. P.*AndreattaE.SaxtonM.ThompsonG.Annich (2011). Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 12(1), 33-38.
3. P.Bazeley (2010). Review of book The mixed methods reader, V.L.Plano ClarkJ.W.Creswell (Eds.). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 79-81.
4. J.*BormannK.A.WarrenL.RegalbutoD.GlaserA.KellyJ.SchnackL.Hinton (2009). A spiritually based caregiver intervention with telephone delivery for family caregivers of veterans with dementia. Alzheimer’s Care Today, 10, 212-220.
5. E.H.*BradleyP.ByamR.AlpernJ.W.ThompsonA.ZerihunY.AbebL.A.Curry (2012). A systems approach to improving rural care in Ethiopia. PLoS One, 23, 222-230.
6. E.*BradleyJ.W.ThompsonP.ByamT.R.WebsterA.ZerihunR.AlpernL..Curry (2011). Access and quality of rural healthcare: Ethiopian Millennium Rural Initiative. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 7, 222-230.
7. A.E.*Brathwaite (2005). Evaluation of a cultural competence course. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 16, 361-369.
8. C.G.BrownD.B.McGuireS.L.BeckD.E.PetersonK.H.Mooney (2007). Visual graphical analysis: A technique to investigate symptom trajectories over time. Nursing Research, 56, 195-201.
9. V.J.CaracelliJ.C.Greene (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 195-207.
10. J.W.Creswell (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
11. J.W.CreswellV.L.Plano Clark (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. M.Crotty (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London, England: Sage.
13. D.M.*CrowleyM.T.GreenbergM.E.FeinbergR.L.SpothC.R.Redmond (2012). The effect of the PROSPER partnership model on cultivating local stakeholder knowledge of evidence-based programs: A five-year longitudinal study of 28 communities. Prevention Science, 13, 96-105.
14. F.A.*DesplenterG.J.LaekemanS.R.Simoens (2011). Following up patients with depression after hospital discharge: A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 5, 28. doi:10.1186/1752-4458-5-28
15. A.T.*Dierick-van DaeleC.SpreeuwenbergE.W.DerckxY.van LeeuwenT.ToemenM.LegiusH.J.. Vrijhoefm (2010). The value of nurse practitioners in Dutch general practices. Quality in Primary Care, 18, 231-241.
16. L.A.*EllisH.W.MarshR.G.Craven (2009). Addressing the challenges faced by early adolescents: A mixed-method evaluation of the benefits of peer support. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44, 54-75.
17. B.C.*EvansM.J.BelyeaE.Ume (2011). Mexican American males providing personal care for their mothers. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33, 234-260.
18. B.C.*EvansM.J.BelyeaD.W.CoonE.Ume (2012). Activities of daily living in Mexican American caregivers: The key to continuing informal care. Journal of Family Nursing, 18, 439-466.
19. A.L.*Fung (2012). Intervention for aggressive victims of school bullying in Hong Kong: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 360-367.
20. D.*GioiaJ.S.Brekke (2009). Neurocognition, ecological validity, and daily living in the community for individuals with schizophrenia: A mixed methods study. Psychiatry, 72, 94-107.
21. J.C.Greene (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. J.C.GreeneV.J.CaracelliW.F.Graham (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
23. G.Guest (2013). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 141-151.
24. N.*HarrL.DunnP.Price (2011). Case study on effect of household task participation on home, community, and work opportunities for a youth with multiple disabilities. Work, 39, 445-453.
25. J.R.*HultJ.WrubelR.BränströmM.AcreeJ.T.Moskowitz (2012). Disclosure and nondisclosure among people newly diagnosed with HIV: An analysis from a stress and coping perspective. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 26, 181-190.
26. K.S.*HussainiE.HammT.Means (2012). Using community-based participatory mixed methods research to understand preconception health in African American communities of Arizona. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17, 1-10.
27. N.V.IvankovaY.Kawamura (2010). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. In A.TashakkoriC.Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 581-611). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. T.*KameiW.ItoiF.KajiiC.KawakamiM.HasegawaT.Sugimoto (2011). Six month outcomes of an innovative weekly intergenerational day program with older adults and school-aged children in a Japanese urban community. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 8, 95-107.
29. A.*KarlströmA.NystedtM.JohanssonI.Hildingsson (2011). Behind the myth: Few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Midwifery, 27, 620-627.
30. K.S.KhanR.KunzJ.KleijnenG.Antes (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118-121.
31. J.D.Long (2012). Longitudinal data analysis for the behavioral sciences using R. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
32. C.V.*LukasR.L.EngleS.K.HolmesV.A.ParkerR.A.PetzelM.Nealon SeibertJ.L.. Sullivan (2010). Strengthening organizations to implement evidence-based clinical practices. Health Care Management Review, 35, 235-245.
33. C.F.*Macpherson (2008). Peer-supported storytelling for grieving pediatric oncology nurses. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 25, 148-163.
34. J.R.*MaddenP.MowryD.GaoP.M.CullenN.K.Foreman (2010). Creative arts therapy improves quality of life for pediatric brain tumor patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 27, 133-145.
35. J.A.MaxwellD.M.Loomis (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A.TashakkoriC.Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 241-271). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. J.F.Molina-Azorin (2011). The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 7-24.
37. S.L.*MolonyL.K.EvansS.JeonJ.RabigL.A.Straka (2011). Trajectories of at-homeness and health in usual care and small house nursing homes. Gerontologist, 51, 504-515.
38. J.M.MorseL.Niehaus (2009). Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
39. N.*NijlandJ.E.van Gemert-PijnenS.M.KeldersB.J.BrandenburgE.R.Seydel (2011). Factors influencing the use of a web-based application for supporting the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(3). doi:10.2196/jmir.1603
40. E.R.*ParkY.ChangV.QuinnS.ReganL.CohenA.VigueraN.. Rigotti (2009). The association of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms and postpartum relapse to smoking: A longitudinal study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11, 707-714.
41. E.R.*ParkY.ChangV.P.QuinnK.RossN.A.Rigotti (2009). Perceived support to stay quit: What happens after delivery?Addictive Behaviors, 34, 1000-1004.
42. C.*PetterssonC.LöfqvistA.M.Fänge (2012). Clients’ experiences of housing adaptations: A longitudinal mixed-methods study. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34, 1706-1715.
43. V.L.Plano Clark (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 428-440.
44. V.L.Plano ClarkK.SchumacherC.WestJ.EdringtonL.B.DunnA.HarzstarkC.. Miaskowski (2013). Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 219-242.
45. V.L.Plano ClarkS.C.Wang (2010). Adapting mixed method research to multicultural counseling. In J.G.PonterottoJ.M.CasasL.A.SuzukiC.M.Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (3rd ed., pp. 427-438). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. A.RossA.J.Onwuegbuzie (2012). Prevalence of mixed methods research in mathematics education. Mathematics Educator, 22(1), 84-113.
47. J.Saldaña (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
48. K.SchumacherV.L.Plano ClarkM.HertzogW.Lydiatt (2012, June). A longitudinal, mixed methods study of preparedness for family caregiving during head and neck cancer treatment. Podium presentation at the 8th Mixed Methods International Conference, Leeds, UK.
49. J.E.StentzV.L.Plano ClarkG.S.Matkin (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 1173-1183.
50. C.*Suárez-OrozcoF.X.GaytánH.J.BangJ.PakesE.O’ConnorJ.Rhodes (2010). Academic trajectories of newcomer immigrant youth. Developmental Psychology, 46, 602-618.
51. A.G.*SymonH.WhitfordJ.Dalzell (2012). Infant feeding in Eastern Scotland: A longitudinal mixed methods evaluation of antenatal intentions and postnatal satisfaction—The Feeding Your Baby study. Midwifery, 29, e49-e56. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.017
52. A.TashakkoriC.Teddlie (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. C.TeddlieA.Tashakkori (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13, 12-28.
54. C.TeddlieA.Tashakkori (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. M.*TetiL.BowlegR.ColeL.LloydS.RubinsteinS.SpencerM.. Gold (2010). A mixed methods evaluation of the effect of the protect and respect intervention on the condom use and disclosure practices of women living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behavior, 14, 567-579.
56. J.M.*Turner-CobbJ.PalmerD.AronsonL.RussellS.PurnellM.OsbornD.S.Jessop (2010). Diurnal cortisol and coping responses in close relatives of persons with acquired brain injury: A longitudinal mixed methods study. Brain Injury, 24, 893-903.
57. P.H.Van NessT.R.FriedT.M.Gill (2011). Mixed methods for the interpretation of longitudinal gerontologic data: Insights from philosophical hermeneutics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 293-308.
58. G.R.*WallenK.BakerM.StolarC.Miller-DavisN.AmesJ.YatesA.. Berger (2012). Palliative care outcomes in surgical oncology patients with advanced malignancies: A mixed methods approach. Quality of Life Research, 21, 405-415.