The Lingula genome provides insights into brachiopod evolution and the origin of phosphate biomineralization

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Luo, Yi Jyun ^a   Takeuchi, Takeshi ^a   Koyanagi, Ryo ^a   Yamada, Lixy ^b   Kanda, Miyuki ^a   Khalturina, Mariia ^a   Fujie, Manabu ^a   Yamasaki, Shin Ichi ^a   Endo, Kazuyoshi ^c   Satoh, Noriyuki ^a  

^a OKINAWA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; MATRIX PROTEIN; PHOSPHATE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE;

ANNELID; BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE; BRACHIOPOD; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; MOLLUSC; PHOSPHATE (ORGANIC); PHYLOGENETICS; PROTEIN; SHELL;

ARTICLE; BIOMINERALIZATION; BRACHIOPODA; EVOLUTION; GENE NUMBER; GENOME; GENOMICS; LINGULA ANATINA; LOPHOTROCHOZOA; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PROTEOMICS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; ANIMAL; ANNELID; BONE MINERALIZATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; INVERTEBRATE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLLUSC; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE;

ANNELIDA; BRACHIOPODA; LINGULA; LINGULA ANATINA; LINGULIDA; LOPHOTROCHOZOA; MOLLUSCA; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; ANNELIDA; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOMICS; INVERTEBRATES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MOLLUSCA; PHYLOGENY; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84942039728     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9301     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Williams, A., Cusack, M. & Mackay, S. Collagenous chitinophosphatic shell of the brachiopod. Lingula. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 346, 223-266 (1994).
2. Sperling, E. A., Pisani, D. & Peterson, K. J. Molecular paleobiological insights into the origin of the Brachiopoda. Evol. Dev. 13, 290-303 (2011).
3. Williams, A., Carlson, S. J., Brunton, C. H. C., Holmer, L. E. & Popov, L. A supra-ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 351, 1171-1193 (1996).
4. Knoll, A. H. Biomineralization and evolutionary history. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 54, 329-356 (2003).
5. Bitner, M. A. & Cohen, B. L. in eLS (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013).
6. Gould, S. J. & Calloway, C. B. Clams and brachiopods; ships that pass in the night. Paleobiology 6, 383-396 (1980).
7. Cook, P. J. & Shergold, J. H. Phosphorus, phosphorites and skeletal evolution at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary. Nature 308, 231-236 (1984).
8. Jackson, D. J. et al. Parallel evolution of nacre building gene sets in molluscs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 591-608 (2010).
9. Yatsu, N. On the development of Lingula anatina. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo 17, 1-112 (1902).
10. Field, K. G. et al. Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239, 748-753 (1988).
11. de Rosa, R. et al. Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature 399, 772-776 (1999).
12. Zhang, Z. F. et al. An early Cambrian agglutinated tubular lophophorate with brachiopod characters. Sci. Rep. 4, 4862 (2014).
13. Cohen, B. L. Rerooting the rDNA gene tree reveals phoronids to be 'brachiopods without shells'; dangers of wide taxon samples in metazoan phylogenetics (Phoronida; Brachiopoda). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 167, 82-92 (2013).
14. Dunn, C. W. et al. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452, 745-749 (2008).
15. Paps, J., Baguna, J. & Riutort, M. Lophotrochozoa internal phylogeny: new insights from an up-to-date analysis of nuclear ribosomal genes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276, 1245-1254 (2009).
16. Erwin, D. H. et al. The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals. Science 334, 1091-1097 (2011).
17. Simakov, O. et al. Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes. Nature 493, 526-531 (2013).
18. Takeuchi, T. et al. Draft genome of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata: a platform for understanding bivalve biology. DNA Res. 19, 117-130 (2012).
19. Zhang, G. et al. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature 490, 49-54 (2012).
20. Williams, A. & Cusack, M. Evolution of a rhythmic lamination in the organophosphatic shells of brachiopods. J. Struct. Biol. 126, 227-240 (1999).
21. Cusack, M., Williams, A. & Buckman, J. O. Chemico-structural evolution of linguloid brachiopod shells. Palaeontology 42, 799-840 (1999).
22. Zhang, Z., Shu, D., Han, J. & Liu, J. Morpho-anatomical differences of the Early Cambrian Chengjiang and Recent lingulids and their implications. Acta Zool. 86, 277-288 (2005).
23. Amemiya, C. T. et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496, 311-316 (2013).
24. Putnam, N. H. et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453, 1064-1071 (2008).
25. Cao, Z. et al. The genome of Mesobuthus martensii reveals a unique adaptation model of arthropods. Nat. Commun. 4, 2602 (2013).
26. Zakrzewski, A. C. et al. Early divergence, broad distribution, and high diversity of animal chitin synthases. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 316-325 (2014).
27. Weiss, I. M., Schonitzer, V., Eichner, N. & Sumper, M. The chitin synthase involved in marine bivalve mollusk shell formation contains a myosin domain. FEBS Lett. 580, 1846-1852 (2006).
28. Schonitzer, V. & Weiss, I. The structure of mollusc larval shells formed in the presence of the chitin synthase inhibitor Nikkomycin Z. BMC Struct. Biol. 7, 71 (2007).
29. Cusack, M. & Freer, A. Biomineralization: elemental and organic influence in carbonate systems. Chem. Rev. 108, 4433-4454 (2008).
30. Marin, F., Luquet, G., Marie, B. & Medakovic, D. Molluscan shell proteins: primary structure, origin, and evolution. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 80, 209-276 (2008).
31. Venkatesh, B. et al. Elephant shark genome provides unique insights into gnathostome evolution. Nature 505, 174-179 (2014).
32. Shimizu, K., Sarashina, I., Kagi, H. & Endo, K. Possible functions of Dpp in gastropod shell formation and shell coiling. Dev. Genes Evol. 221, 59-68 (2011).
33. Chen, G., Deng, C. & Li, Y. P. TGF-beta and BMP signaling in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 8, 272-288 (2012).
34. Ramos-Silva, P. et al. The skeletal proteome of the coral Acropora millepora: the evolution of calcification by co-option and domain shuffling. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2099-2112 (2013).
35. Nair, A. K., Gautieri, A., Chang, S.-W. & Buehler, M. J. Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone. Nat. Commun. 4, 1724 (2013).
36. Kawasaki, K., Buchanan, A. V. & Weiss, K. M. Biomineralization in humans: making the hard choices in life. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 119-142 (2009).
37. Smith, S. A. et al. Resolving the evolutionary relationships of molluscs with phylogenomic tools. Nature 480, 364-367 (2011).
38. Kocot, K. M. et al. Phylogenomics reveals deep molluscan relationships. Nature 477, 452-456 (2011).
39. Drake, J. L. et al. Proteomic analysis of skeletal organic matrix from the stony coral Stylophora pistillata. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3788-3793 (2013).
40. Wada, H., Okuyama, M., Satoh, N. & Zhang, S. Molecular evolution of fibrillar collagen in chordates, with implications for the evolution of vertebrate skeletons and chordate phylogeny. Evol. Dev. 8, 370-377 (2006).
41. Livingston, B. T. et al. A genome-wide analysis of biomineralization-related proteins in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev. Biol. 300, 335-348 (2006).
42. Nishizawa, A., Sarashina, I., Tsujimoto, Y., IIjima, M. & Endo, K. Artificial fertilization, early development and chromosome numbers in the brachiopod Lingula anatina. Palaeontology 84, 1-8 (2010).
43. Tagawa, K., Nishino, A., Humphreys, T. & Satoh, N. The spawning and early development of the Hawaiian acorn worm (hemichordate) Ptychodera flava. Zool. Sci. 15, 85-91 (1998).
44. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114-2120 (2014).
45. Van Nieuwerburgh, F. et al. Illumina mate-paired DNA sequencing-library preparation using Cre-Lox recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e24 (2012).
46. Leggett, R. M., Clavijo, B. J., Clissold, L., Clark, M. D. & Caccamo, M. NextClip: an analysis and read preparation tool for Nextera Long Mate Pair libraries. Bioinformatics 30, 566-568 (2014).
47. Shinzato, C. et al. Using the Acropora digitifera genome to understand coral responses to environmental change. Nature 476, 320-323 (2011).
48. Caruccio, N. Preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries using Nextera technology: simultaneous DNA fragmentation and adaptor tagging by in vitro transposition. Methods Mol. Biol. 733, 241-255 (2011).
49. Boetzer, M., Henkel, C. V., Jansen, H. J., Butler, D. & Pirovano, W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27, 578-579 (2011).
50. Chaisson, M. J. & Tesler, G. Mapping single molecule sequencing reads using basic local alignment with successive refinement (BLASR): application and theory. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 238 (2012).
51. Boetzer, M. & Pirovano, W. SSPACE-LongRead: scaffolding bacterial draft genomes using long read sequence information. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 211 (2014).
52. Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1, 18 (2012).
53. Price, A. L., Jones, N. C. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21, i351-i358 (2005).
54. Marçais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764-770 (2011).
55. Parra, G., Bradnam, K. & Korf, I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061-1067 (2007).
56. Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494-1512 (2013).
57. Fischer, S. et al. Using OrthoMCL to assign proteins to OrthoMCL-DB groups or to cluster proteomes into new ortholog groups. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 6, Unit 6 12 11-19 (2011).
58. De Bie, T., Cristianini, N., Demuth, J. P. & Hahn, M. W. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics 22, 1269-1271 (2006).
59. Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhu, J. & Yu, J. KaKs-Calculator 2.0: a toolkit incorporating gamma-series methods and sliding window strategies. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 8, 77-80 (2010).
60. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. I. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059-3066 (2002).
61. Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972-1973 (2009).
62. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312-1313 (2014).
63. Lartillot, N., Lepage, T. & Blanquart, S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25, 2286-2288 (2009).
64. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
65. Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).
66. Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658-1659 (2006).
67. Bardou, P., Mariette, J., Escudie, F., Djemiel, C. & Klopp, C. jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 293 (2014).
68. Huang, da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44-57 (2009).
69. Mi, H., Muruganujan, A. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D377-D386 (2013).
70. Sanggaard, K. W. et al. Spider genomes provide insight into composition and evolution of venom and silk. Nat. Commun. 5, 3765 (2014).